Cargando…

Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases

One of the more recently investigated adverse long‐term side effects of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for prostate cancer (PCa) is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies suggest lower risk of CVD following GnRH antagonists (degarelix) than GnRH agonists. This protocol describes preci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Gincy, Scailteux, Lucie‐Marie, Garmo, Hans, Balusson, Frédéric, Cardwell, Christopher, Coster, Greet De, Schutter, Harlinde De, Kuiper, Josephina G., McMenamin, Úna, Verbeeck, Julie, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30776136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12454
_version_ 1783469408746733568
author George, Gincy
Scailteux, Lucie‐Marie
Garmo, Hans
Balusson, Frédéric
Cardwell, Christopher
Coster, Greet De
Schutter, Harlinde De
Kuiper, Josephina G.
McMenamin, Úna
Verbeeck, Julie
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
author_facet George, Gincy
Scailteux, Lucie‐Marie
Garmo, Hans
Balusson, Frédéric
Cardwell, Christopher
Coster, Greet De
Schutter, Harlinde De
Kuiper, Josephina G.
McMenamin, Úna
Verbeeck, Julie
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
author_sort George, Gincy
collection PubMed
description One of the more recently investigated adverse long‐term side effects of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for prostate cancer (PCa) is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies suggest lower risk of CVD following GnRH antagonists (degarelix) than GnRH agonists. This protocol describes precise codes used to extract variables from five European databases for a study that compares risk of CVD following GnRH agonists and antagonists for PCa. PCa men on primary GnRH agonists or antagonists were identified from the UK THIN (The Health Improvement Network) database, National Health Service (NHS) Scotland, Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR), Dutch PHARMO Database Network and French National Database (SNIIRAM). Cohort entry was defined as date of treatment initiation. CVD event was defined as any first incident or fatal CVD after cohort entry. Readcodes in THIN and ICD codes in NHS Scotland, BCR, PHARMO and SNIIRAM were used to extract variables. Risk of Bias in Non‐randomised studies of Interventions (ROBINS‐I) tool was used to assess the potential risk of biases in this study. 51 572 men with a median follow‐up time of 2 years started on GnRH agonists and 2 417 men with a median follow‐up time of 1 year started on GnRH antagonists between 2010 and 2017 in the UK, Scotland, Belgium, the Netherlands and France. Data from five countries improved the study power and internal validity required to compare risk of CVD between GnRH agonists and antagonists, the latter being a fairly new drug with limited data in individual countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68503632019-11-18 Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases George, Gincy Scailteux, Lucie‐Marie Garmo, Hans Balusson, Frédéric Cardwell, Christopher Coster, Greet De Schutter, Harlinde De Kuiper, Josephina G. McMenamin, Úna Verbeeck, Julie Van Hemelrijck, Mieke Fundam Clin Pharmacol Original Articles One of the more recently investigated adverse long‐term side effects of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for prostate cancer (PCa) is cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies suggest lower risk of CVD following GnRH antagonists (degarelix) than GnRH agonists. This protocol describes precise codes used to extract variables from five European databases for a study that compares risk of CVD following GnRH agonists and antagonists for PCa. PCa men on primary GnRH agonists or antagonists were identified from the UK THIN (The Health Improvement Network) database, National Health Service (NHS) Scotland, Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR), Dutch PHARMO Database Network and French National Database (SNIIRAM). Cohort entry was defined as date of treatment initiation. CVD event was defined as any first incident or fatal CVD after cohort entry. Readcodes in THIN and ICD codes in NHS Scotland, BCR, PHARMO and SNIIRAM were used to extract variables. Risk of Bias in Non‐randomised studies of Interventions (ROBINS‐I) tool was used to assess the potential risk of biases in this study. 51 572 men with a median follow‐up time of 2 years started on GnRH agonists and 2 417 men with a median follow‐up time of 1 year started on GnRH antagonists between 2010 and 2017 in the UK, Scotland, Belgium, the Netherlands and France. Data from five countries improved the study power and internal validity required to compare risk of CVD between GnRH agonists and antagonists, the latter being a fairly new drug with limited data in individual countries. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-25 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6850363/ /pubmed/30776136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12454 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Société Françaisede Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
George, Gincy
Scailteux, Lucie‐Marie
Garmo, Hans
Balusson, Frédéric
Cardwell, Christopher
Coster, Greet De
Schutter, Harlinde De
Kuiper, Josephina G.
McMenamin, Úna
Verbeeck, Julie
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases
title Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases
title_full Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases
title_fullStr Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases
title_full_unstemmed Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases
title_short Real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following GnRH agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five European databases
title_sort real‐world insights into risk of developing cardiovascular disease following gnrh agonists versus antagonists for prostate cancer: a methodological protocol to a study using five european databases
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30776136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12454
work_keys_str_mv AT georgegincy realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT scailteuxluciemarie realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT garmohans realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT balussonfrederic realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT cardwellchristopher realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT costergreetde realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT schutterharlindede realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT kuiperjosephinag realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT mcmenaminuna realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT verbeeckjulie realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases
AT vanhemelrijckmieke realworldinsightsintoriskofdevelopingcardiovasculardiseasefollowinggnrhagonistsversusantagonistsforprostatecanceramethodologicalprotocoltoastudyusingfiveeuropeandatabases