_version_ 1783469411555868672
author Castro‐Díez, Pilar
Vaz, Ana Sofia
Silva, Joaquim S.
van Loo, Marcela
Alonso, Álvaro
Aponte, Cristina
Bayón, Álvaro
Bellingham, Peter J.
Chiuffo, Mariana C.
DiManno, Nicole
Julian, Kahua
Kandert, Susanne
La Porta, Nicola
Marchante, Hélia
Maule, Hamish G.
Mayfield, Margaret M.
Metcalfe, Daniel
Monteverdi, M. Cristina
Núñez, Martín A.
Ostertag, Rebecca
Parker, Ingrid M.
Peltzer, Duane A.
Potgieter, Luke J.
Raymundo, Maia
Rayome, Donald
Reisman‐Berman, Orna
Richardson, David M.
Roos, Ruben E.
Saldaña, Asunción
Shackleton, Ross T.
Torres, Agostina
Trudgen, Melinda
Urban, Josef
Vicente, Joana R.
Vilà, Montserrat
Ylioja, Tiina
Zenni, Rafael D.
Godoy, Oscar
author_facet Castro‐Díez, Pilar
Vaz, Ana Sofia
Silva, Joaquim S.
van Loo, Marcela
Alonso, Álvaro
Aponte, Cristina
Bayón, Álvaro
Bellingham, Peter J.
Chiuffo, Mariana C.
DiManno, Nicole
Julian, Kahua
Kandert, Susanne
La Porta, Nicola
Marchante, Hélia
Maule, Hamish G.
Mayfield, Margaret M.
Metcalfe, Daniel
Monteverdi, M. Cristina
Núñez, Martín A.
Ostertag, Rebecca
Parker, Ingrid M.
Peltzer, Duane A.
Potgieter, Luke J.
Raymundo, Maia
Rayome, Donald
Reisman‐Berman, Orna
Richardson, David M.
Roos, Ruben E.
Saldaña, Asunción
Shackleton, Ross T.
Torres, Agostina
Trudgen, Melinda
Urban, Josef
Vicente, Joana R.
Vilà, Montserrat
Ylioja, Tiina
Zenni, Rafael D.
Godoy, Oscar
author_sort Castro‐Díez, Pilar
collection PubMed
description Non‐native tree (NNT) species have been transported worldwide to create or enhance services that are fundamental for human well‐being, such as timber provision, erosion control or ornamental value; yet NNTs can also produce undesired effects, such as fire proneness or pollen allergenicity. Despite the variety of effects that NNTs have on multiple ecosystem services, a global quantitative assessment of their costs and benefits is still lacking. Such information is critical for decision‐making, management and sustainable exploitation of NNTs. We present here a global assessment of NNT effects on the three main categories of ecosystem services, including regulating (RES), provisioning (PES) and cultural services (CES), and on an ecosystem disservice (EDS), i.e. pollen allergenicity. By searching the scientific literature, country forestry reports, and social media, we compiled a global data set of 1683 case studies from over 125 NNT species, covering 44 countries, all continents but Antarctica, and seven biomes. Using different meta‐analysis techniques, we found that, while NNTs increase most RES (e.g. climate regulation, soil erosion control, fertility and formation), they decrease PES (e.g. NNTs contribute less than native trees to global timber provision). Also, they have different effects on CES (e.g. increase aesthetic values but decrease scientific interest), and no effect on the EDS considered. NNT effects on each ecosystem (dis)service showed a strong context dependency, varying across NNT types, biomes and socio‐economic conditions. For instance, some RES are increased more by NNTs able to fix atmospheric nitrogen, and when the ecosystem is located in low‐latitude biomes; some CES are increased more by NNTs in less‐wealthy countries or in countries with higher gross domestic products. The effects of NNTs on several ecosystem (dis)services exhibited some synergies (e.g. among soil fertility, soil formation and climate regulation or between aesthetic values and pollen allergenicity), but also trade‐offs (e.g. between fire regulation and soil erosion control). Our analyses provide a quantitative understanding of the complex synergies, trade‐offs and context dependencies involved for the effects of NNTs that is essential for attaining a sustained provision of ecosystem services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68503752019-11-18 Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services Castro‐Díez, Pilar Vaz, Ana Sofia Silva, Joaquim S. van Loo, Marcela Alonso, Álvaro Aponte, Cristina Bayón, Álvaro Bellingham, Peter J. Chiuffo, Mariana C. DiManno, Nicole Julian, Kahua Kandert, Susanne La Porta, Nicola Marchante, Hélia Maule, Hamish G. Mayfield, Margaret M. Metcalfe, Daniel Monteverdi, M. Cristina Núñez, Martín A. Ostertag, Rebecca Parker, Ingrid M. Peltzer, Duane A. Potgieter, Luke J. Raymundo, Maia Rayome, Donald Reisman‐Berman, Orna Richardson, David M. Roos, Ruben E. Saldaña, Asunción Shackleton, Ross T. Torres, Agostina Trudgen, Melinda Urban, Josef Vicente, Joana R. Vilà, Montserrat Ylioja, Tiina Zenni, Rafael D. Godoy, Oscar Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Original Articles Non‐native tree (NNT) species have been transported worldwide to create or enhance services that are fundamental for human well‐being, such as timber provision, erosion control or ornamental value; yet NNTs can also produce undesired effects, such as fire proneness or pollen allergenicity. Despite the variety of effects that NNTs have on multiple ecosystem services, a global quantitative assessment of their costs and benefits is still lacking. Such information is critical for decision‐making, management and sustainable exploitation of NNTs. We present here a global assessment of NNT effects on the three main categories of ecosystem services, including regulating (RES), provisioning (PES) and cultural services (CES), and on an ecosystem disservice (EDS), i.e. pollen allergenicity. By searching the scientific literature, country forestry reports, and social media, we compiled a global data set of 1683 case studies from over 125 NNT species, covering 44 countries, all continents but Antarctica, and seven biomes. Using different meta‐analysis techniques, we found that, while NNTs increase most RES (e.g. climate regulation, soil erosion control, fertility and formation), they decrease PES (e.g. NNTs contribute less than native trees to global timber provision). Also, they have different effects on CES (e.g. increase aesthetic values but decrease scientific interest), and no effect on the EDS considered. NNT effects on each ecosystem (dis)service showed a strong context dependency, varying across NNT types, biomes and socio‐economic conditions. For instance, some RES are increased more by NNTs able to fix atmospheric nitrogen, and when the ecosystem is located in low‐latitude biomes; some CES are increased more by NNTs in less‐wealthy countries or in countries with higher gross domestic products. The effects of NNTs on several ecosystem (dis)services exhibited some synergies (e.g. among soil fertility, soil formation and climate regulation or between aesthetic values and pollen allergenicity), but also trade‐offs (e.g. between fire regulation and soil erosion control). Our analyses provide a quantitative understanding of the complex synergies, trade‐offs and context dependencies involved for the effects of NNTs that is essential for attaining a sustained provision of ecosystem services. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-04-11 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6850375/ /pubmed/30974048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12511 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Castro‐Díez, Pilar
Vaz, Ana Sofia
Silva, Joaquim S.
van Loo, Marcela
Alonso, Álvaro
Aponte, Cristina
Bayón, Álvaro
Bellingham, Peter J.
Chiuffo, Mariana C.
DiManno, Nicole
Julian, Kahua
Kandert, Susanne
La Porta, Nicola
Marchante, Hélia
Maule, Hamish G.
Mayfield, Margaret M.
Metcalfe, Daniel
Monteverdi, M. Cristina
Núñez, Martín A.
Ostertag, Rebecca
Parker, Ingrid M.
Peltzer, Duane A.
Potgieter, Luke J.
Raymundo, Maia
Rayome, Donald
Reisman‐Berman, Orna
Richardson, David M.
Roos, Ruben E.
Saldaña, Asunción
Shackleton, Ross T.
Torres, Agostina
Trudgen, Melinda
Urban, Josef
Vicente, Joana R.
Vilà, Montserrat
Ylioja, Tiina
Zenni, Rafael D.
Godoy, Oscar
Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
title Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
title_full Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
title_fullStr Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
title_full_unstemmed Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
title_short Global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
title_sort global effects of non‐native tree species on multiple ecosystem services
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12511
work_keys_str_mv AT castrodiezpilar globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT vazanasofia globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT silvajoaquims globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT vanloomarcela globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT alonsoalvaro globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT apontecristina globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT bayonalvaro globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT bellinghampeterj globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT chiuffomarianac globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT dimannonicole globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT juliankahua globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT kandertsusanne globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT laportanicola globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT marchantehelia globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT maulehamishg globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT mayfieldmargaretm globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT metcalfedaniel globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT monteverdimcristina globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT nunezmartina globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT ostertagrebecca globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT parkeringridm globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT peltzerduanea globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT potgieterlukej globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT raymundomaia globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT rayomedonald globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT reismanbermanorna globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT richardsondavidm globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT roosrubene globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT saldanaasuncion globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT shackletonrosst globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT torresagostina globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT trudgenmelinda globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT urbanjosef globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT vicentejoanar globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT vilamontserrat globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT yliojatiina globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT zennirafaeld globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices
AT godoyoscar globaleffectsofnonnativetreespeciesonmultipleecosystemservices