Cargando…

Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Providing follow‐up to patients with low‐risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can be considered as low‐value care. However, dermatologists still provide substantial follow‐up care to this patient group, for reasons not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors influencing current BCC f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Egmond, S., Wakkee, M., van Rengen, A., Bastiaens, M.T., Nijsten, T., Lugtenberg, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17594
_version_ 1783469419494637568
author van Egmond, S.
Wakkee, M.
van Rengen, A.
Bastiaens, M.T.
Nijsten, T.
Lugtenberg, M.
author_facet van Egmond, S.
Wakkee, M.
van Rengen, A.
Bastiaens, M.T.
Nijsten, T.
Lugtenberg, M.
author_sort van Egmond, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providing follow‐up to patients with low‐risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can be considered as low‐value care. However, dermatologists still provide substantial follow‐up care to this patient group, for reasons not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors influencing current BCC follow‐up practices among dermatologists and suggested strategies to de‐adopt this low‐value care. In addition, views of patients regarding follow‐up care were explored. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted consisting of 18 semistructured interviews with dermatologists and three focus groups with a total of 17 patients with low‐risk BCC who had received dermatological care. The interviews focused on current follow‐up practices, influencing factors and suggested strategies to de‐adopt the follow‐up care. The focus groups discussed preferred follow‐up schedules and providers, as well as the content of follow‐up. All (group) interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by two researchers using ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS: Factors influencing current follow‐up care practices among dermatologists included complying with patients’ preferences, lack of trust in general practitioners (GPs), financial incentives and force of habit. Patients reported varying needs regarding periodic follow‐up visits, preferred to be seen by a dermatologist and indicated a need for improved information provision. Suggested strategies by dermatologists to de‐adopt the low‐value care encompassed educating patients with improved information, educating GPs to increase trust of dermatologists, realizing appropriate financial reimbursement and informing dermatologists about the low value of care. CONCLUSIONS: A mixture of factors appear to contribute to current follow‐up practices after low‐risk BCC. In order to de‐adopt this low‐value care, strategies should be aimed at dermatologists and GPs, and also patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68504162019-11-18 Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study van Egmond, S. Wakkee, M. van Rengen, A. Bastiaens, M.T. Nijsten, T. Lugtenberg, M. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Providing follow‐up to patients with low‐risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can be considered as low‐value care. However, dermatologists still provide substantial follow‐up care to this patient group, for reasons not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors influencing current BCC follow‐up practices among dermatologists and suggested strategies to de‐adopt this low‐value care. In addition, views of patients regarding follow‐up care were explored. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted consisting of 18 semistructured interviews with dermatologists and three focus groups with a total of 17 patients with low‐risk BCC who had received dermatological care. The interviews focused on current follow‐up practices, influencing factors and suggested strategies to de‐adopt the follow‐up care. The focus groups discussed preferred follow‐up schedules and providers, as well as the content of follow‐up. All (group) interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by two researchers using ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS: Factors influencing current follow‐up care practices among dermatologists included complying with patients’ preferences, lack of trust in general practitioners (GPs), financial incentives and force of habit. Patients reported varying needs regarding periodic follow‐up visits, preferred to be seen by a dermatologist and indicated a need for improved information provision. Suggested strategies by dermatologists to de‐adopt the low‐value care encompassed educating patients with improved information, educating GPs to increase trust of dermatologists, realizing appropriate financial reimbursement and informing dermatologists about the low value of care. CONCLUSIONS: A mixture of factors appear to contribute to current follow‐up practices after low‐risk BCC. In order to de‐adopt this low‐value care, strategies should be aimed at dermatologists and GPs, and also patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-28 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6850416/ /pubmed/30597525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17594 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Egmond, S.
Wakkee, M.
van Rengen, A.
Bastiaens, M.T.
Nijsten, T.
Lugtenberg, M.
Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
title Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
title_full Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
title_short Factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
title_sort factors influencing current low‐value follow‐up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de‐adoption: a qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17594
work_keys_str_mv AT vanegmonds factorsinfluencingcurrentlowvaluefollowupcareafterbasalcellcarcinomaandsuggestedstrategiesfordeadoptionaqualitativestudy
AT wakkeem factorsinfluencingcurrentlowvaluefollowupcareafterbasalcellcarcinomaandsuggestedstrategiesfordeadoptionaqualitativestudy
AT vanrengena factorsinfluencingcurrentlowvaluefollowupcareafterbasalcellcarcinomaandsuggestedstrategiesfordeadoptionaqualitativestudy
AT bastiaensmt factorsinfluencingcurrentlowvaluefollowupcareafterbasalcellcarcinomaandsuggestedstrategiesfordeadoptionaqualitativestudy
AT nijstent factorsinfluencingcurrentlowvaluefollowupcareafterbasalcellcarcinomaandsuggestedstrategiesfordeadoptionaqualitativestudy
AT lugtenbergm factorsinfluencingcurrentlowvaluefollowupcareafterbasalcellcarcinomaandsuggestedstrategiesfordeadoptionaqualitativestudy