Cargando…
Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments
BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a common chronic facial dermatosis. Classification of rosacea has evolved from subtyping to phenotyping. OBJECTIVES: To update our systematic review on interventions for rosacea. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index and ongoing trials r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30585305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17590 |
_version_ | 1783469424701865984 |
---|---|
author | van Zuuren, E.J. Fedorowicz, Z. Tan, J. van der Linden, M.M.D. Arents, B.W.M. Carter, B. Charland, L. |
author_facet | van Zuuren, E.J. Fedorowicz, Z. Tan, J. van der Linden, M.M.D. Arents, B.W.M. Carter, B. Charland, L. |
author_sort | van Zuuren, E.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a common chronic facial dermatosis. Classification of rosacea has evolved from subtyping to phenotyping. OBJECTIVES: To update our systematic review on interventions for rosacea. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index and ongoing trials registers (March 2018) for randomized controlled trials. Study selection, data extraction, risk‐of‐bias assessment and analyses were carried out independently by two authors. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: We included 152 studies (46 were new), comprising 20 944 participants. Topical interventions included brimonidine, oxymetazoline, metronidazole, azelaic acid, ivermectin and other topical treatments. Systemic interventions included oral antibiotics, combinations with topical treatments or other systemic treatments. Several studies evaluated laser or light‐based treatment. We present the most current evidence for rosacea management based on a phenotype‐led approach. CONCLUSIONS: For reducing temporarily persistent erythema there was high‐certainty evidence for topical brimonidine and moderate certainty for topical oxymetazoline; for erythema and mainly telangiectasia there was low‐to‐moderate‐certainty evidence for laser and intense pulsed light therapy. For reducing papules/pustules there was high‐certainty evidence for topical azelaic acid and topical ivermectin; moderate‐to‐high‐certainty evidence for doxycycline 40 mg modified release (MR) and isotretinoin; and moderate‐certainty evidence for topical metronidazole, and topical minocycline and oral minocycline being equally effective as doxycycline 40 mg MR. There was low‐certainty evidence for tetracycline and low‐dose minocycline. For ocular rosacea, there was moderate‐certainty evidence that oral omega‐3 fatty acids were effective and low‐certainty evidence for ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion and doxycycline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6850438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68504382019-11-18 Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments van Zuuren, E.J. Fedorowicz, Z. Tan, J. van der Linden, M.M.D. Arents, B.W.M. Carter, B. Charland, L. Br J Dermatol Evidence‐based Dermatology BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a common chronic facial dermatosis. Classification of rosacea has evolved from subtyping to phenotyping. OBJECTIVES: To update our systematic review on interventions for rosacea. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index and ongoing trials registers (March 2018) for randomized controlled trials. Study selection, data extraction, risk‐of‐bias assessment and analyses were carried out independently by two authors. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: We included 152 studies (46 were new), comprising 20 944 participants. Topical interventions included brimonidine, oxymetazoline, metronidazole, azelaic acid, ivermectin and other topical treatments. Systemic interventions included oral antibiotics, combinations with topical treatments or other systemic treatments. Several studies evaluated laser or light‐based treatment. We present the most current evidence for rosacea management based on a phenotype‐led approach. CONCLUSIONS: For reducing temporarily persistent erythema there was high‐certainty evidence for topical brimonidine and moderate certainty for topical oxymetazoline; for erythema and mainly telangiectasia there was low‐to‐moderate‐certainty evidence for laser and intense pulsed light therapy. For reducing papules/pustules there was high‐certainty evidence for topical azelaic acid and topical ivermectin; moderate‐to‐high‐certainty evidence for doxycycline 40 mg modified release (MR) and isotretinoin; and moderate‐certainty evidence for topical metronidazole, and topical minocycline and oral minocycline being equally effective as doxycycline 40 mg MR. There was low‐certainty evidence for tetracycline and low‐dose minocycline. For ocular rosacea, there was moderate‐certainty evidence that oral omega‐3 fatty acids were effective and low‐certainty evidence for ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion and doxycycline. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-10 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6850438/ /pubmed/30585305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17590 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Evidence‐based Dermatology van Zuuren, E.J. Fedorowicz, Z. Tan, J. van der Linden, M.M.D. Arents, B.W.M. Carter, B. Charland, L. Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments |
title | Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments
|
title_full | Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments
|
title_fullStr | Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments
|
title_full_unstemmed | Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments
|
title_short | Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments
|
title_sort | interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including grade assessments |
topic | Evidence‐based Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30585305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanzuurenej interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments AT fedorowiczz interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments AT tanj interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments AT vanderlindenmmd interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments AT arentsbwm interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments AT carterb interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments AT charlandl interventionsforrosaceabasedonthephenotypeapproachanupdatedsystematicreviewincludinggradeassessments |