Cargando…

Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management

Rangelands cover 40–50% of the Earth's terrestrial surface. While often characterized by limited, yet variable resource availability, rangelands are vital for humans, providing numerous ecosystem goods and services. In the conterminous United States (CONUS), the dominant component of rangeland...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Nathaniel P., Allred, Brady W., Naugle, David E., Jones, Matthew O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1862
_version_ 1783469425162190848
author Robinson, Nathaniel P.
Allred, Brady W.
Naugle, David E.
Jones, Matthew O.
author_facet Robinson, Nathaniel P.
Allred, Brady W.
Naugle, David E.
Jones, Matthew O.
author_sort Robinson, Nathaniel P.
collection PubMed
description Rangelands cover 40–50% of the Earth's terrestrial surface. While often characterized by limited, yet variable resource availability, rangelands are vital for humans, providing numerous ecosystem goods and services. In the conterminous United States (CONUS), the dominant component of rangeland conservation is a network of public rangelands, concentrated in the west. Public rangelands are interspersed with private and tribal rangelands resulting in a complex mosaic of land tenure and management priorities. We quantify ownership patterns of rangeland production at multiple scales across CONUS and find that both total production and average productivity of private rangelands is more than twice that of public and tribal rangelands. At finer scales, private rangelands are consistently more productive than their public counterparts. We also demonstrate an inverse relationship between public rangeland acreage and productivity. While conserving acreage is crucial to rangeland conservation, just as critical are broad‐scale ecological patterns and processes that sustain ecosystem services. Across CONUS, ownership regimes capture distinct elements of these patterns and services, demonstrated through disparate production dynamics. As ownership determines the range of feasible conservation actions, and the technical and financial resources available to implement them, understanding ownership‐production dynamics is critical for effective and sustained conservation of rangeland ecosystem services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68504402019-11-18 Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management Robinson, Nathaniel P. Allred, Brady W. Naugle, David E. Jones, Matthew O. Ecol Appl Communications Rangelands cover 40–50% of the Earth's terrestrial surface. While often characterized by limited, yet variable resource availability, rangelands are vital for humans, providing numerous ecosystem goods and services. In the conterminous United States (CONUS), the dominant component of rangeland conservation is a network of public rangelands, concentrated in the west. Public rangelands are interspersed with private and tribal rangelands resulting in a complex mosaic of land tenure and management priorities. We quantify ownership patterns of rangeland production at multiple scales across CONUS and find that both total production and average productivity of private rangelands is more than twice that of public and tribal rangelands. At finer scales, private rangelands are consistently more productive than their public counterparts. We also demonstrate an inverse relationship between public rangeland acreage and productivity. While conserving acreage is crucial to rangeland conservation, just as critical are broad‐scale ecological patterns and processes that sustain ecosystem services. Across CONUS, ownership regimes capture distinct elements of these patterns and services, demonstrated through disparate production dynamics. As ownership determines the range of feasible conservation actions, and the technical and financial resources available to implement them, understanding ownership‐production dynamics is critical for effective and sustained conservation of rangeland ecosystem services. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-27 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6850440/ /pubmed/30706573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1862 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Communications
Robinson, Nathaniel P.
Allred, Brady W.
Naugle, David E.
Jones, Matthew O.
Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management
title Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management
title_full Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management
title_fullStr Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management
title_short Patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: Implications for conservation and management
title_sort patterns of rangeland productivity and land ownership: implications for conservation and management
topic Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30706573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1862
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonnathanielp patternsofrangelandproductivityandlandownershipimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT allredbradyw patternsofrangelandproductivityandlandownershipimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT naugledavide patternsofrangelandproductivityandlandownershipimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT jonesmatthewo patternsofrangelandproductivityandlandownershipimplicationsforconservationandmanagement