Cargando…
Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
AIMS: SYNERGY II was a 12‐month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30644570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23919 |
_version_ | 1783469452912754688 |
---|---|
author | Mueller, Elizabeth R. van Maanen, Rob Chapple, Christopher Abrams, Paul Herschorn, Sender Robinson, Dudley Stoelzel, Matthias Yoon, Sang J. Al‐Shukri, Salman Rechberger, Tomasz Gratzke, Christian |
author_facet | Mueller, Elizabeth R. van Maanen, Rob Chapple, Christopher Abrams, Paul Herschorn, Sender Robinson, Dudley Stoelzel, Matthias Yoon, Sang J. Al‐Shukri, Salman Rechberger, Tomasz Gratzke, Christian |
author_sort | Mueller, Elizabeth R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: SYNERGY II was a 12‐month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<65, ≥65, <75, and ≥75 years). METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥18 years with symptoms of “wet” OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 months. Patients were randomized to receive once‐daily solifenacin succinate and mirabegron (5 mg/50 mg; combination), solifenacin succinate, or mirabegron (4:1:1). Safety evaluations: treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiogram, post‐void residual volume, and laboratory assessments. Primary efficacy variables: change from baseline to end of treatment in number of incontinence episodes/24 h and micturitions/24 h. RESULTS: Of 1794 patients (full analysis set), 614 (34.2%) and 168 (9.4%) were ≥65 and ≥75 years old, respectively. Overall, 856 (47.2%) patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Higher TEAE incidences were typically observed for the combination versus both monotherapies (eg, constipation) and in the older versus younger age groups (eg, urinary tract infection). Increases in mean pulse rate from baseline of >1 bpm were noted in the combination and mirabegron younger age groups only. No clinically significant findings were observed in the other safety parameters. The efficacy variables improved with all treatments and the greatest improvements were typically observed with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron and solifenacin combination therapy was a well‐tolerated and effective treatment for patients with OAB symptoms irrespective of their age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6850571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68505712019-11-18 Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study Mueller, Elizabeth R. van Maanen, Rob Chapple, Christopher Abrams, Paul Herschorn, Sender Robinson, Dudley Stoelzel, Matthias Yoon, Sang J. Al‐Shukri, Salman Rechberger, Tomasz Gratzke, Christian Neurourol Urodyn Original Clinical Articles AIMS: SYNERGY II was a 12‐month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<65, ≥65, <75, and ≥75 years). METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥18 years with symptoms of “wet” OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 months. Patients were randomized to receive once‐daily solifenacin succinate and mirabegron (5 mg/50 mg; combination), solifenacin succinate, or mirabegron (4:1:1). Safety evaluations: treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiogram, post‐void residual volume, and laboratory assessments. Primary efficacy variables: change from baseline to end of treatment in number of incontinence episodes/24 h and micturitions/24 h. RESULTS: Of 1794 patients (full analysis set), 614 (34.2%) and 168 (9.4%) were ≥65 and ≥75 years old, respectively. Overall, 856 (47.2%) patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Higher TEAE incidences were typically observed for the combination versus both monotherapies (eg, constipation) and in the older versus younger age groups (eg, urinary tract infection). Increases in mean pulse rate from baseline of >1 bpm were noted in the combination and mirabegron younger age groups only. No clinically significant findings were observed in the other safety parameters. The efficacy variables improved with all treatments and the greatest improvements were typically observed with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron and solifenacin combination therapy was a well‐tolerated and effective treatment for patients with OAB symptoms irrespective of their age. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-15 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6850571/ /pubmed/30644570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23919 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Articles Mueller, Elizabeth R. van Maanen, Rob Chapple, Christopher Abrams, Paul Herschorn, Sender Robinson, Dudley Stoelzel, Matthias Yoon, Sang J. Al‐Shukri, Salman Rechberger, Tomasz Gratzke, Christian Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study |
title | Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study |
title_full | Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study |
title_fullStr | Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study |
title_full_unstemmed | Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study |
title_short | Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study |
title_sort | long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase iii synergy ii study |
topic | Original Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30644570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellerelizabethr longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT vanmaanenrob longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT chapplechristopher longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT abramspaul longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT herschornsender longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT robinsondudley longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT stoelzelmatthias longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT yoonsangj longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT alshukrisalman longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT rechbergertomasz longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy AT gratzkechristian longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy |