Cargando…

Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study

AIMS: SYNERGY II was a 12‐month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Elizabeth R., van Maanen, Rob, Chapple, Christopher, Abrams, Paul, Herschorn, Sender, Robinson, Dudley, Stoelzel, Matthias, Yoon, Sang J., Al‐Shukri, Salman, Rechberger, Tomasz, Gratzke, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30644570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23919
_version_ 1783469452912754688
author Mueller, Elizabeth R.
van Maanen, Rob
Chapple, Christopher
Abrams, Paul
Herschorn, Sender
Robinson, Dudley
Stoelzel, Matthias
Yoon, Sang J.
Al‐Shukri, Salman
Rechberger, Tomasz
Gratzke, Christian
author_facet Mueller, Elizabeth R.
van Maanen, Rob
Chapple, Christopher
Abrams, Paul
Herschorn, Sender
Robinson, Dudley
Stoelzel, Matthias
Yoon, Sang J.
Al‐Shukri, Salman
Rechberger, Tomasz
Gratzke, Christian
author_sort Mueller, Elizabeth R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: SYNERGY II was a 12‐month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<65, ≥65, <75, and ≥75 years). METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥18 years with symptoms of “wet” OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 months. Patients were randomized to receive once‐daily solifenacin succinate and mirabegron (5 mg/50 mg; combination), solifenacin succinate, or mirabegron (4:1:1). Safety evaluations: treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiogram, post‐void residual volume, and laboratory assessments. Primary efficacy variables: change from baseline to end of treatment in number of incontinence episodes/24 h and micturitions/24 h. RESULTS: Of 1794 patients (full analysis set), 614 (34.2%) and 168 (9.4%) were ≥65 and ≥75 years old, respectively. Overall, 856 (47.2%) patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Higher TEAE incidences were typically observed for the combination versus both monotherapies (eg, constipation) and in the older versus younger age groups (eg, urinary tract infection). Increases in mean pulse rate from baseline of >1 bpm were noted in the combination and mirabegron younger age groups only. No clinically significant findings were observed in the other safety parameters. The efficacy variables improved with all treatments and the greatest improvements were typically observed with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron and solifenacin combination therapy was a well‐tolerated and effective treatment for patients with OAB symptoms irrespective of their age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68505712019-11-18 Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study Mueller, Elizabeth R. van Maanen, Rob Chapple, Christopher Abrams, Paul Herschorn, Sender Robinson, Dudley Stoelzel, Matthias Yoon, Sang J. Al‐Shukri, Salman Rechberger, Tomasz Gratzke, Christian Neurourol Urodyn Original Clinical Articles AIMS: SYNERGY II was a 12‐month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<65, ≥65, <75, and ≥75 years). METHODS: Eligible patients were ≥18 years with symptoms of “wet” OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 months. Patients were randomized to receive once‐daily solifenacin succinate and mirabegron (5 mg/50 mg; combination), solifenacin succinate, or mirabegron (4:1:1). Safety evaluations: treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiogram, post‐void residual volume, and laboratory assessments. Primary efficacy variables: change from baseline to end of treatment in number of incontinence episodes/24 h and micturitions/24 h. RESULTS: Of 1794 patients (full analysis set), 614 (34.2%) and 168 (9.4%) were ≥65 and ≥75 years old, respectively. Overall, 856 (47.2%) patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Higher TEAE incidences were typically observed for the combination versus both monotherapies (eg, constipation) and in the older versus younger age groups (eg, urinary tract infection). Increases in mean pulse rate from baseline of >1 bpm were noted in the combination and mirabegron younger age groups only. No clinically significant findings were observed in the other safety parameters. The efficacy variables improved with all treatments and the greatest improvements were typically observed with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron and solifenacin combination therapy was a well‐tolerated and effective treatment for patients with OAB symptoms irrespective of their age. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-15 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6850571/ /pubmed/30644570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23919 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Articles
Mueller, Elizabeth R.
van Maanen, Rob
Chapple, Christopher
Abrams, Paul
Herschorn, Sender
Robinson, Dudley
Stoelzel, Matthias
Yoon, Sang J.
Al‐Shukri, Salman
Rechberger, Tomasz
Gratzke, Christian
Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
title Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
title_full Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
title_fullStr Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
title_short Long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study
title_sort long‐term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase iii synergy ii study
topic Original Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30644570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.23919
work_keys_str_mv AT muellerelizabethr longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT vanmaanenrob longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT chapplechristopher longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT abramspaul longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT herschornsender longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT robinsondudley longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT stoelzelmatthias longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT yoonsangj longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT alshukrisalman longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT rechbergertomasz longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy
AT gratzkechristian longtermtreatmentofolderpatientswithoveractivebladderusingacombinationofmirabegronandsolifenacinaprespecifiedanalysisfromtherandomizedphaseiiisynergyiistudy