Cargando…
The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty
Robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves accuracy in achieving the planned acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional manual THA. Robotic THA improves precision and reduces outliers in restoring the planned centre of hip rotation compared to conventional manual THA. Improved accuracy i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088 |
_version_ | 1783469636533092352 |
---|---|
author | Kayani, Babar Konan, Sujith Ayuob, Atif Ayyad, Salamah Haddad, Fares S. |
author_facet | Kayani, Babar Konan, Sujith Ayuob, Atif Ayyad, Salamah Haddad, Fares S. |
author_sort | Kayani, Babar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves accuracy in achieving the planned acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional manual THA. Robotic THA improves precision and reduces outliers in restoring the planned centre of hip rotation compared to conventional manual THA. Improved accuracy in restoring hip biomechanics and acetabular cup positioning in robotic THA have not translated to any differences in early functional outcomes, correction of leg-length discrepancy, or postoperative complications compared to conventional manual THA. Limitations of robotic THA include substantive installation costs, additional radiation exposure, steep learning curves for gaining surgical proficiency, and compatibility of the robotic technology with a limited number of implant designs. Further higher quality studies are required to compare differences in conventional versus robotic THA in relation to long-term functional outcomes, implant survivorship, time to revision surgery, and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:618-625. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6851528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68515282019-11-21 The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty Kayani, Babar Konan, Sujith Ayuob, Atif Ayyad, Salamah Haddad, Fares S. EFORT Open Rev Hip Robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) improves accuracy in achieving the planned acetabular cup positioning compared to conventional manual THA. Robotic THA improves precision and reduces outliers in restoring the planned centre of hip rotation compared to conventional manual THA. Improved accuracy in restoring hip biomechanics and acetabular cup positioning in robotic THA have not translated to any differences in early functional outcomes, correction of leg-length discrepancy, or postoperative complications compared to conventional manual THA. Limitations of robotic THA include substantive installation costs, additional radiation exposure, steep learning curves for gaining surgical proficiency, and compatibility of the robotic technology with a limited number of implant designs. Further higher quality studies are required to compare differences in conventional versus robotic THA in relation to long-term functional outcomes, implant survivorship, time to revision surgery, and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:618-625. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6851528/ /pubmed/31754468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088 Text en © 2019 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed. |
spellingShingle | Hip Kayani, Babar Konan, Sujith Ayuob, Atif Ayyad, Salamah Haddad, Fares S. The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
title | The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
title_full | The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
title_short | The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
title_sort | current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty |
topic | Hip |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayanibabar thecurrentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT konansujith thecurrentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT ayuobatif thecurrentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT ayyadsalamah thecurrentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT haddadfaress thecurrentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT kayanibabar currentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT konansujith currentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT ayuobatif currentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT ayyadsalamah currentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty AT haddadfaress currentroleofroboticsintotalhiparthroplasty |