Cargando…

Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance

There is evidence that supplementing methionine has positive effects on uterine environment, oocyte quality and embryo development in cattle. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate reproductive traits of cows supplemented with rumen‐protected methionine (RPM) during early to mid‐lactation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Süss, David, Iwersen, Michael, Schweinzer, Vanessa, Gusterer, Erika, Kanz, Peter, Krieger, Stefanie, Pothmann, Harald, Wagener, Karen, Hoelker, Michael, Tesfaye, Dawit, Schellander, Karl, Helmbrecht, Ariane, Parys, Claudia, Drillich, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.13509
_version_ 1783469703059996672
author Süss, David
Iwersen, Michael
Schweinzer, Vanessa
Gusterer, Erika
Kanz, Peter
Krieger, Stefanie
Pothmann, Harald
Wagener, Karen
Hoelker, Michael
Tesfaye, Dawit
Schellander, Karl
Helmbrecht, Ariane
Parys, Claudia
Drillich, Marc
author_facet Süss, David
Iwersen, Michael
Schweinzer, Vanessa
Gusterer, Erika
Kanz, Peter
Krieger, Stefanie
Pothmann, Harald
Wagener, Karen
Hoelker, Michael
Tesfaye, Dawit
Schellander, Karl
Helmbrecht, Ariane
Parys, Claudia
Drillich, Marc
author_sort Süss, David
collection PubMed
description There is evidence that supplementing methionine has positive effects on uterine environment, oocyte quality and embryo development in cattle. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate reproductive traits of cows supplemented with rumen‐protected methionine (RPM) during early to mid‐lactation in comparison with an untreated control group (CON). An additional focus was on the effect of puerperal diseases on reproductive performance parameters in RPM‐supplemented group MET and in CON. A total of 1,709 multiparous Holstein‐Friesian cows were enrolled in this field trial conducted on a commercial dairy farm in Slovakia. Cows were allocated at approximately 12 days post‐partum (dpp) to either CON or MET, the latter supplemented with 25.0 g–27.2 g RPM per cow per day incorporated into the total mixed ration (TMR) until leaving the study pen at approximately 140 dpp. The amount of RPM was calculated based on individual feed ingredients analysis and adjusted during the study period when TMR changed. Cows were monitored during the post‐partum period by vaginal examination (day 5 pp), measuring of beta‐hydroxybutyrate in blood (3, 5, and 8 dpp) and by vaginal examination, uterine cytology and measuring of back fat thickness by ultrasound (all at 31 ± 3 dpp). Compared with CON, cows supplemented with RPM did not show better reproduction performance parameters (first service submission rate, days to first service, conception risk, days open 140). Results from binary logistic regression model for the risk of conception showed that metritis had a significant effect, but the supplementation of methionine had not. Results of Cox regression analysis for the odds of conception within 140 dpp revealed only metritis and clinical endometritis as significant factors. In conclusion, supplementation of RPM had no beneficial effect on reproductive performance in this study farm compared with an untreated control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6851860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68518602019-11-18 Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance Süss, David Iwersen, Michael Schweinzer, Vanessa Gusterer, Erika Kanz, Peter Krieger, Stefanie Pothmann, Harald Wagener, Karen Hoelker, Michael Tesfaye, Dawit Schellander, Karl Helmbrecht, Ariane Parys, Claudia Drillich, Marc Reprod Domest Anim Original Articles There is evidence that supplementing methionine has positive effects on uterine environment, oocyte quality and embryo development in cattle. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate reproductive traits of cows supplemented with rumen‐protected methionine (RPM) during early to mid‐lactation in comparison with an untreated control group (CON). An additional focus was on the effect of puerperal diseases on reproductive performance parameters in RPM‐supplemented group MET and in CON. A total of 1,709 multiparous Holstein‐Friesian cows were enrolled in this field trial conducted on a commercial dairy farm in Slovakia. Cows were allocated at approximately 12 days post‐partum (dpp) to either CON or MET, the latter supplemented with 25.0 g–27.2 g RPM per cow per day incorporated into the total mixed ration (TMR) until leaving the study pen at approximately 140 dpp. The amount of RPM was calculated based on individual feed ingredients analysis and adjusted during the study period when TMR changed. Cows were monitored during the post‐partum period by vaginal examination (day 5 pp), measuring of beta‐hydroxybutyrate in blood (3, 5, and 8 dpp) and by vaginal examination, uterine cytology and measuring of back fat thickness by ultrasound (all at 31 ± 3 dpp). Compared with CON, cows supplemented with RPM did not show better reproduction performance parameters (first service submission rate, days to first service, conception risk, days open 140). Results from binary logistic regression model for the risk of conception showed that metritis had a significant effect, but the supplementation of methionine had not. Results of Cox regression analysis for the odds of conception within 140 dpp revealed only metritis and clinical endometritis as significant factors. In conclusion, supplementation of RPM had no beneficial effect on reproductive performance in this study farm compared with an untreated control group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-06 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6851860/ /pubmed/31301254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.13509 Text en © 2019 The Authors.Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Süss, David
Iwersen, Michael
Schweinzer, Vanessa
Gusterer, Erika
Kanz, Peter
Krieger, Stefanie
Pothmann, Harald
Wagener, Karen
Hoelker, Michael
Tesfaye, Dawit
Schellander, Karl
Helmbrecht, Ariane
Parys, Claudia
Drillich, Marc
Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
title Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
title_full Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
title_fullStr Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
title_full_unstemmed Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
title_short Supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
title_sort supplementing rumen‐protected methionine to lactating multiparous dairy cows did not improve reproductive performance
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.13509
work_keys_str_mv AT sussdavid supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT iwersenmichael supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT schweinzervanessa supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT gusterererika supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT kanzpeter supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT kriegerstefanie supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT pothmannharald supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT wagenerkaren supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT hoelkermichael supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT tesfayedawit supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT schellanderkarl supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT helmbrechtariane supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT parysclaudia supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance
AT drillichmarc supplementingrumenprotectedmethioninetolactatingmultiparousdairycowsdidnotimprovereproductiveperformance