Cargando…

Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6

PURPOSE: The Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth 3–6 years (PAI‐CY 3‐6) was recently developed to assess the participation needs of children with visual impairment (VI) by means of parent‐proxy report. This study reports on its psychometric properties. METHODS: Parents of chi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsman, Ellen B M, van Nispen, Ruth M A, van Rens, Gerardus H M B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31468574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12642
_version_ 1783469707556290560
author Elsman, Ellen B M
van Nispen, Ruth M A
van Rens, Gerardus H M B
author_facet Elsman, Ellen B M
van Nispen, Ruth M A
van Rens, Gerardus H M B
author_sort Elsman, Ellen B M
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth 3–6 years (PAI‐CY 3‐6) was recently developed to assess the participation needs of children with visual impairment (VI) by means of parent‐proxy report. This study reports on its psychometric properties. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years registered at two low vision rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate and completed the 52‐item PAI‐CY. Satisfaction with the PAI‐CY 3‐6 was determined using an evaluation form. Basic item analyses was conducted, after which an item response theory (IRT) model (i.e. the graded response model, GRM) was fitted. Deletion of items was informed by results of item analyses, fulfillment of IRT assumptions, differential item functioning, fit to the GRM and item information content. Face and content validity were considered; professionals from low vision rehabilitation centers were asked for their opinion in the item deletion process. After obtaining a satisfactory set of items, known‐group validity, concurrent validity and test‐retest reliability were also investigated. RESULTS: Data of 237 parents were included in the analyses. Various aspects of the PAI‐CY 3‐6 were perceived as neutral to positive by over 85% of the respondents. After removing 17 items, the remaining 35 items reflected satisfactory fit to the GRM. Known‐group validity was supported, since participants with more severe VI and comorbidity scored significantly worse than those with less severe VI and without comorbidity after correcting for potential confounders. Test‐retest reliability was adequate, and the PAI‐CY showed to have good concurrent validity. Feedback from professionals motivated the maintenance of 3 of the 17 deleted items, although not included in the scoring. Furthermore, two new items were added, resulting in a 40‐item instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The PAI‐CY 3‐6 has sound psychometric properties and can now be used to assess the participation needs of children aged 3–6 years with VI by means of proxy. Implementation in routine low vision rehabilitation care enables further optimization and investigation of its acceptability and feasibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6851879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68518792019-11-18 Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6 Elsman, Ellen B M van Nispen, Ruth M A van Rens, Gerardus H M B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Original Articles PURPOSE: The Participation and Activity Inventory for Children and Youth 3–6 years (PAI‐CY 3‐6) was recently developed to assess the participation needs of children with visual impairment (VI) by means of parent‐proxy report. This study reports on its psychometric properties. METHODS: Parents of children aged 3–6 years registered at two low vision rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate and completed the 52‐item PAI‐CY. Satisfaction with the PAI‐CY 3‐6 was determined using an evaluation form. Basic item analyses was conducted, after which an item response theory (IRT) model (i.e. the graded response model, GRM) was fitted. Deletion of items was informed by results of item analyses, fulfillment of IRT assumptions, differential item functioning, fit to the GRM and item information content. Face and content validity were considered; professionals from low vision rehabilitation centers were asked for their opinion in the item deletion process. After obtaining a satisfactory set of items, known‐group validity, concurrent validity and test‐retest reliability were also investigated. RESULTS: Data of 237 parents were included in the analyses. Various aspects of the PAI‐CY 3‐6 were perceived as neutral to positive by over 85% of the respondents. After removing 17 items, the remaining 35 items reflected satisfactory fit to the GRM. Known‐group validity was supported, since participants with more severe VI and comorbidity scored significantly worse than those with less severe VI and without comorbidity after correcting for potential confounders. Test‐retest reliability was adequate, and the PAI‐CY showed to have good concurrent validity. Feedback from professionals motivated the maintenance of 3 of the 17 deleted items, although not included in the scoring. Furthermore, two new items were added, resulting in a 40‐item instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The PAI‐CY 3‐6 has sound psychometric properties and can now be used to assess the participation needs of children aged 3–6 years with VI by means of proxy. Implementation in routine low vision rehabilitation care enables further optimization and investigation of its acceptability and feasibility. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-29 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6851879/ /pubmed/31468574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12642 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Elsman, Ellen B M
van Nispen, Ruth M A
van Rens, Gerardus H M B
Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6
title Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6
title_full Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6
title_fullStr Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6
title_short Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: PAI‐CY 3‐6
title_sort psychometric evaluation of a new proxy‐instrument to assess participation in children aged 3–6 years with visual impairment: pai‐cy 3‐6
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31468574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12642
work_keys_str_mv AT elsmanellenbm psychometricevaluationofanewproxyinstrumenttoassessparticipationinchildrenaged36yearswithvisualimpairmentpaicy36
AT vannispenruthma psychometricevaluationofanewproxyinstrumenttoassessparticipationinchildrenaged36yearswithvisualimpairmentpaicy36
AT vanrensgerardushmb psychometricevaluationofanewproxyinstrumenttoassessparticipationinchildrenaged36yearswithvisualimpairmentpaicy36