Cargando…

Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study

Joint stability is a primary concern in total knee joint replacement. The GMK Sphere prosthesis was specifically designed to provide medial compartment anterior–posterior (A–P) stability, while permitting rotational freedom of the joint through a flat lateral tibial surface. The objective of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schütz, Pascal, Taylor, William R., Postolka, Barbara, Fucentese, Sandro F., Koch, Peter P., Freeman, Michael A.R., Pinskerova, Vera, List, Renate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.24416
_version_ 1783469710429388800
author Schütz, Pascal
Taylor, William R.
Postolka, Barbara
Fucentese, Sandro F.
Koch, Peter P.
Freeman, Michael A.R.
Pinskerova, Vera
List, Renate
author_facet Schütz, Pascal
Taylor, William R.
Postolka, Barbara
Fucentese, Sandro F.
Koch, Peter P.
Freeman, Michael A.R.
Pinskerova, Vera
List, Renate
author_sort Schütz, Pascal
collection PubMed
description Joint stability is a primary concern in total knee joint replacement. The GMK Sphere prosthesis was specifically designed to provide medial compartment anterior–posterior (A–P) stability, while permitting rotational freedom of the joint through a flat lateral tibial surface. The objective of this study was to establish the changes in joint kinematics introduced by the GMK Sphere prosthesis during gait activities in comparison to conventional posterior‐stabilized (PS) fixed‐bearing and ultra‐congruent (UC) mobile‐bearing geometries. The A–P translation and internal/external rotation of three cohorts, each with 10 good outcome subjects (2.9 ± 1.6 years postop), with a GMK Sphere, GMK PS or GMK UC implant were analysed throughout complete cycles of gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. The GMK Sphere showed the smallest range of medial compartment A–P translation for level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent (3.6 ± 0.9 mm, 3.1 ± 0.8 mm, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm), followed by the GMK UC (5.7 ± 1.0 mm, 8.0 ± 1.7 mm, 8.7 ± 1.9 mm) and the GMK PS (10.3 ± 2.2 mm, 10.1 ± 2.6 mm, 11.6 ± 1.6 mm) geometries. The GMK Sphere exhibited the largest range of lateral compartment A–P translation (12.1 ± 2.2 mm), and the largest range of tibial internal/external rotation (13.2 ± 2.2°), both during stair descent. This study has shown that the GMK Sphere clearly restricts A–P motion of the medial condyle during gait activities while still allowing a large range of axial rotation. The additional comparison against the conventional GMK PS and UC geometries, not only demonstrates that implant geometry is a key factor in governing tibio‐femoral kinematics, but also that the geometry itself probably plays a more dominant role for joint movement than the type of gait activity. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research (®) published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 37:2337–2347, 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6851890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68518902019-11-18 Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study Schütz, Pascal Taylor, William R. Postolka, Barbara Fucentese, Sandro F. Koch, Peter P. Freeman, Michael A.R. Pinskerova, Vera List, Renate J Orthop Res Research Articles Joint stability is a primary concern in total knee joint replacement. The GMK Sphere prosthesis was specifically designed to provide medial compartment anterior–posterior (A–P) stability, while permitting rotational freedom of the joint through a flat lateral tibial surface. The objective of this study was to establish the changes in joint kinematics introduced by the GMK Sphere prosthesis during gait activities in comparison to conventional posterior‐stabilized (PS) fixed‐bearing and ultra‐congruent (UC) mobile‐bearing geometries. The A–P translation and internal/external rotation of three cohorts, each with 10 good outcome subjects (2.9 ± 1.6 years postop), with a GMK Sphere, GMK PS or GMK UC implant were analysed throughout complete cycles of gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. The GMK Sphere showed the smallest range of medial compartment A–P translation for level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent (3.6 ± 0.9 mm, 3.1 ± 0.8 mm, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm), followed by the GMK UC (5.7 ± 1.0 mm, 8.0 ± 1.7 mm, 8.7 ± 1.9 mm) and the GMK PS (10.3 ± 2.2 mm, 10.1 ± 2.6 mm, 11.6 ± 1.6 mm) geometries. The GMK Sphere exhibited the largest range of lateral compartment A–P translation (12.1 ± 2.2 mm), and the largest range of tibial internal/external rotation (13.2 ± 2.2°), both during stair descent. This study has shown that the GMK Sphere clearly restricts A–P motion of the medial condyle during gait activities while still allowing a large range of axial rotation. The additional comparison against the conventional GMK PS and UC geometries, not only demonstrates that implant geometry is a key factor in governing tibio‐femoral kinematics, but also that the geometry itself probably plays a more dominant role for joint movement than the type of gait activity. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research (®) published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 37:2337–2347, 2019 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-07 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6851890/ /pubmed/31304995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.24416 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Schütz, Pascal
Taylor, William R.
Postolka, Barbara
Fucentese, Sandro F.
Koch, Peter P.
Freeman, Michael A.R.
Pinskerova, Vera
List, Renate
Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study
title Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study
title_full Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study
title_fullStr Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study
title_full_unstemmed Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study
title_short Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study
title_sort kinematic evaluation of the gmk sphere implant during gait activities: a dynamic videofluoroscopy study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.24416
work_keys_str_mv AT schutzpascal kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT taylorwilliamr kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT postolkabarbara kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT fucentesesandrof kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT kochpeterp kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT freemanmichaelar kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT pinskerovavera kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy
AT listrenate kinematicevaluationofthegmksphereimplantduringgaitactivitiesadynamicvideofluoroscopystudy