Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector
INTRODUCTION: We conducted this study to show the safety and efficacy of a new implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), the BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik SE & Co. KG; Berlin, Germany), and to describe the arrhythmia detection performance. METHODS: The BioMonitor 2 has an extended sensing vector and is impla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31119745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13728 |
_version_ | 1783469710662172672 |
---|---|
author | Piorkowski, Christopher Busch, Mathias Nölker, Georg Schmitt, Jörn Roithinger, Franz Xaver Young, Glenn Táborský, Miloš Herrmann, Gundula Schmitz, Dietmar |
author_facet | Piorkowski, Christopher Busch, Mathias Nölker, Georg Schmitt, Jörn Roithinger, Franz Xaver Young, Glenn Táborský, Miloš Herrmann, Gundula Schmitz, Dietmar |
author_sort | Piorkowski, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We conducted this study to show the safety and efficacy of a new implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), the BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik SE & Co. KG; Berlin, Germany), and to describe the arrhythmia detection performance. METHODS: The BioMonitor 2 has an extended sensing vector and is implanted close to the heart. It can transmit up to six subcutaneous electrocardiogram strips by Home Monitoring each day. We enrolled 92 patients with a standard device indication for an ICM in a single‐arm, multicenter prospective trial. Patients were followed for 3 months, and 48‐h Holter recordings were used to evaluate the arrhythmia detection performance. RESULTS: One patient withdrew consent and in one patient, the implantation failed. Two study device‐related serious adverse events were reported, satisfying the primary safety hypothesis. Implantations took 7.4 ± 4.4 min from skin cut to suture. At 1 week, the R‐wave amplitude was 0.75 ± 0.53 mV. In the 82 patients with completed Holter recordings, all patients with arrhythmias were correctly identified. False positive detections of arrhythmia were mostly irregular rhythms wrongly detected as atrial fibrillation (episode‐based positive predictive value 72.5%). Daily Home Monitoring transmission was 94.9% successful. CONCLUSION: Safety and efficacy of the new device has been demonstrated. The detected R‐wave amplitudes are large, leading to a low level of inappropriate detections due to over‐ or undersensing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6851891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68518912019-11-18 Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector Piorkowski, Christopher Busch, Mathias Nölker, Georg Schmitt, Jörn Roithinger, Franz Xaver Young, Glenn Táborský, Miloš Herrmann, Gundula Schmitz, Dietmar Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices INTRODUCTION: We conducted this study to show the safety and efficacy of a new implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), the BioMonitor 2 (Biotronik SE & Co. KG; Berlin, Germany), and to describe the arrhythmia detection performance. METHODS: The BioMonitor 2 has an extended sensing vector and is implanted close to the heart. It can transmit up to six subcutaneous electrocardiogram strips by Home Monitoring each day. We enrolled 92 patients with a standard device indication for an ICM in a single‐arm, multicenter prospective trial. Patients were followed for 3 months, and 48‐h Holter recordings were used to evaluate the arrhythmia detection performance. RESULTS: One patient withdrew consent and in one patient, the implantation failed. Two study device‐related serious adverse events were reported, satisfying the primary safety hypothesis. Implantations took 7.4 ± 4.4 min from skin cut to suture. At 1 week, the R‐wave amplitude was 0.75 ± 0.53 mV. In the 82 patients with completed Holter recordings, all patients with arrhythmias were correctly identified. False positive detections of arrhythmia were mostly irregular rhythms wrongly detected as atrial fibrillation (episode‐based positive predictive value 72.5%). Daily Home Monitoring transmission was 94.9% successful. CONCLUSION: Safety and efficacy of the new device has been demonstrated. The detected R‐wave amplitudes are large, leading to a low level of inappropriate detections due to over‐ or undersensing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-05 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6851891/ /pubmed/31119745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13728 Text en © 2019 The Authors Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Devices Piorkowski, Christopher Busch, Mathias Nölker, Georg Schmitt, Jörn Roithinger, Franz Xaver Young, Glenn Táborský, Miloš Herrmann, Gundula Schmitz, Dietmar Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
title | Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of a small implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector |
topic | Devices |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31119745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.13728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piorkowskichristopher clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT buschmathias clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT nolkergeorg clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT schmittjorn clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT roithingerfranzxaver clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT youngglenn clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT taborskymilos clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT herrmanngundula clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector AT schmitzdietmar clinicalevaluationofasmallimplantablecardiacmonitorwithalongsensingvector |