Cargando…

Stress echocardiography for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction detection in patients with non-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study

AIM: To assess whether the simultaneous performance of exercise stress echocardiography and cardio-pulmonary testing (ESE-CPET) may facilitate the timely diagnosis of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients with non-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cherneva, Radostina Vl., Gospodinova, Mariana V., Denchev, Stefan V., Petkov, Rosen B., Kostadinov, Dimitar E., Cherneva, Zheina Vl.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2019.60.449
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To assess whether the simultaneous performance of exercise stress echocardiography and cardio-pulmonary testing (ESE-CPET) may facilitate the timely diagnosis of subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients with non-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), preserved left ventricular systolic function, and exertional dyspnea or exercise intolerance. METHODS: This cross-sectional study, conducted between May 2017 and April 2018, involved 104 non-severe COPD patients with exertional dyspnea and preserved ejection fraction who underwent echocardiography before CPET and 1-2 minutes after peak exercise. Based on the peak E/e’ ratio, patients were divided into the group with stress-induced LVDD – E/e’>15 and the group without stress-induced LVDD. We assessed the association between LVDD and the following CPET variables: minute ventilation, peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)), ventilatory efficiency, heart rate reserve, and blood pressure. RESULTS: During ESE-CPET, stress-induced LVDD occurred in 67/104 patients (64%). These patients had lower work load, peak VO(2), O(2) pulse, and minute ventilation (VE), and higher VE/VCO(2) slope than patients without stress-induced LVDD (35.18 ± 10.4 vs 37.01 ± 11.11, P < 0.05). None of the CPET variables correlated with E/e’. CONCLUSION: Combined ESE-CPET may distinguish masked LVDD in patients with non-severe COPD with exertional dyspnea and preserved left ventricular systolic function. None of the CPET variables was a predictor for subclinical LVDD.