Cargando…

No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds

The acoustic reflex (AR), a longstanding component of the audiological test battery, has received renewed attention in the context of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy—the destruction of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibers. Noninvasive proxy measures of synaptopathy are wid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guest, Hannah, Munro, Kevin J., Couth, Samuel, Millman, Rebecca E., Prendergast, Garreth, Kluk, Karolina, Murray, Carlyn, Plack, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519874165
_version_ 1783469816309350400
author Guest, Hannah
Munro, Kevin J.
Couth, Samuel
Millman, Rebecca E.
Prendergast, Garreth
Kluk, Karolina
Murray, Carlyn
Plack, Chris
author_facet Guest, Hannah
Munro, Kevin J.
Couth, Samuel
Millman, Rebecca E.
Prendergast, Garreth
Kluk, Karolina
Murray, Carlyn
Plack, Chris
author_sort Guest, Hannah
collection PubMed
description The acoustic reflex (AR), a longstanding component of the audiological test battery, has received renewed attention in the context of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy—the destruction of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibers. Noninvasive proxy measures of synaptopathy are widely sought, and AR thresholds (ARTs) correlate closely with synaptic survival in rodents. However, measurement in humans at high stimulus frequencies—likely important when testing for noise-induced pathology—can be challenging; reflexes at 4 kHz are frequently absent or occur only at high stimulus levels, even in young people with clinically normal audiograms. This phenomenon may partly reflect differences across stimulus frequency in the temporal characteristics of the response; later onset of the response, earlier onset of adaptation, and higher rate of adaptation have been observed at 4 kHz than at 1 kHz. One temporal aspect of the response that has received little attention is the interstimulus interval (ISI); inadequate duration of ISI might lead to incomplete recovery of the response between successive presentations and consequent response fatigue. This research aimed to test for effects of ISI on ARTs in normally hearing young humans, measured at 1 and 4 kHz. Contrary to our hypotheses, increasing ISIs from 2.5 to 8.5 s did not reduce ART level, nor raise ART reliability. Results confirm that clinically measured ARTs—including those at 4 kHz—can exhibit excellent reliability and that relatively short (2.5 s) ISIs are adequate for the measurement of sensitive and reliable ARTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6852360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68523602019-11-22 No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds Guest, Hannah Munro, Kevin J. Couth, Samuel Millman, Rebecca E. Prendergast, Garreth Kluk, Karolina Murray, Carlyn Plack, Chris Trends Hear ManCAD100: Original Article The acoustic reflex (AR), a longstanding component of the audiological test battery, has received renewed attention in the context of noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy—the destruction of synapses between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fibers. Noninvasive proxy measures of synaptopathy are widely sought, and AR thresholds (ARTs) correlate closely with synaptic survival in rodents. However, measurement in humans at high stimulus frequencies—likely important when testing for noise-induced pathology—can be challenging; reflexes at 4 kHz are frequently absent or occur only at high stimulus levels, even in young people with clinically normal audiograms. This phenomenon may partly reflect differences across stimulus frequency in the temporal characteristics of the response; later onset of the response, earlier onset of adaptation, and higher rate of adaptation have been observed at 4 kHz than at 1 kHz. One temporal aspect of the response that has received little attention is the interstimulus interval (ISI); inadequate duration of ISI might lead to incomplete recovery of the response between successive presentations and consequent response fatigue. This research aimed to test for effects of ISI on ARTs in normally hearing young humans, measured at 1 and 4 kHz. Contrary to our hypotheses, increasing ISIs from 2.5 to 8.5 s did not reduce ART level, nor raise ART reliability. Results confirm that clinically measured ARTs—including those at 4 kHz—can exhibit excellent reliability and that relatively short (2.5 s) ISIs are adequate for the measurement of sensitive and reliable ARTs. SAGE Publications 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6852360/ /pubmed/31516095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519874165 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle ManCAD100: Original Article
Guest, Hannah
Munro, Kevin J.
Couth, Samuel
Millman, Rebecca E.
Prendergast, Garreth
Kluk, Karolina
Murray, Carlyn
Plack, Chris
No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
title No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
title_full No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
title_fullStr No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
title_full_unstemmed No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
title_short No Effect of Interstimulus Interval on Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
title_sort no effect of interstimulus interval on acoustic reflex thresholds
topic ManCAD100: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519874165
work_keys_str_mv AT guesthannah noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT munrokevinj noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT couthsamuel noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT millmanrebeccae noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT prendergastgarreth noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT klukkarolina noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT murraycarlyn noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds
AT plackchris noeffectofinterstimulusintervalonacousticreflexthresholds