Cargando…

Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

OBJECTIVES: Older adult patients are underrepresented in clinical trials comparing non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study used multiple data sources to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deitelzweig, Steven, Keshishian, Allison, Li, Xiaoyan, Kang, Amiee, Dhamane, Amol D., Luo, Xuemei, Balachander, Neeraja, Rosenblatt, Lisa, Mardekian, Jack, Pan, Xianying, Nadkarni, Anagha, Di Fusco, Manuela, Garcia Reeves, Alessandra B., Yuce, Huseyin, Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15956
_version_ 1783469830502875136
author Deitelzweig, Steven
Keshishian, Allison
Li, Xiaoyan
Kang, Amiee
Dhamane, Amol D.
Luo, Xuemei
Balachander, Neeraja
Rosenblatt, Lisa
Mardekian, Jack
Pan, Xianying
Nadkarni, Anagha
Di Fusco, Manuela
Garcia Reeves, Alessandra B.
Yuce, Huseyin
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
author_facet Deitelzweig, Steven
Keshishian, Allison
Li, Xiaoyan
Kang, Amiee
Dhamane, Amol D.
Luo, Xuemei
Balachander, Neeraja
Rosenblatt, Lisa
Mardekian, Jack
Pan, Xianying
Nadkarni, Anagha
Di Fusco, Manuela
Garcia Reeves, Alessandra B.
Yuce, Huseyin
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
author_sort Deitelzweig, Steven
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Older adult patients are underrepresented in clinical trials comparing non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study used multiple data sources to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among very old patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) prescribed NOACs or warfarin. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and three US commercial claims databases. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 88 582 very old (aged ≥80 y) NVAF patients newly initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. MEASUREMENTS: In each database, six 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts were created for each drug comparison. Patient cohorts were pooled from all four databases after PSM. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke/SE and MB. RESULTS: The patients in the six matched cohorts had a mean follow‐up time of 7 to 9 months. Compared with warfarin, apixaban (HR = .58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .49‐.69), dabigatran (HR = .77; 95% CI = .60‐.99), and rivaroxaban (HR = .74; 95% CI = .65‐.85) were associated with lower risks of stroke/SE. For MB, apixaban (HR = .60; 95% CI = .54‐.67) was associated with a lower risk; dabigatran (HR = .92; 95% CI = .78‐1.07) was associated with a similar risk, and rivaroxaban (HR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.07‐1.24) was associated with a higher risk compared with warfarin. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB compared with dabigatran (stroke/SE: HR = .65; 95% CI = .47‐.89; MB: HR = .60; 95% CI = .49‐.73) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: HR = .72; 95% CI = .59‐.86; MB: HR = .50; 95% CI = .45‐.55). Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of MB (HR = .77; 95% CI = .67‐.90) compared with rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: Among very old NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with lower rates of stroke/SE and varying rates of MB compared with warfarin. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1662–1671, 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6852415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68524152019-11-20 Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Deitelzweig, Steven Keshishian, Allison Li, Xiaoyan Kang, Amiee Dhamane, Amol D. Luo, Xuemei Balachander, Neeraja Rosenblatt, Lisa Mardekian, Jack Pan, Xianying Nadkarni, Anagha Di Fusco, Manuela Garcia Reeves, Alessandra B. Yuce, Huseyin Lip, Gregory Y. H. J Am Geriatr Soc Clinical Investigations OBJECTIVES: Older adult patients are underrepresented in clinical trials comparing non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study used multiple data sources to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among very old patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) prescribed NOACs or warfarin. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and three US commercial claims databases. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 88 582 very old (aged ≥80 y) NVAF patients newly initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. MEASUREMENTS: In each database, six 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts were created for each drug comparison. Patient cohorts were pooled from all four databases after PSM. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke/SE and MB. RESULTS: The patients in the six matched cohorts had a mean follow‐up time of 7 to 9 months. Compared with warfarin, apixaban (HR = .58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .49‐.69), dabigatran (HR = .77; 95% CI = .60‐.99), and rivaroxaban (HR = .74; 95% CI = .65‐.85) were associated with lower risks of stroke/SE. For MB, apixaban (HR = .60; 95% CI = .54‐.67) was associated with a lower risk; dabigatran (HR = .92; 95% CI = .78‐1.07) was associated with a similar risk, and rivaroxaban (HR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.07‐1.24) was associated with a higher risk compared with warfarin. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB compared with dabigatran (stroke/SE: HR = .65; 95% CI = .47‐.89; MB: HR = .60; 95% CI = .49‐.73) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: HR = .72; 95% CI = .59‐.86; MB: HR = .50; 95% CI = .45‐.55). Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of MB (HR = .77; 95% CI = .67‐.90) compared with rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: Among very old NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with lower rates of stroke/SE and varying rates of MB compared with warfarin. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1662–1671, 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-21 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6852415/ /pubmed/31112292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15956 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Deitelzweig, Steven
Keshishian, Allison
Li, Xiaoyan
Kang, Amiee
Dhamane, Amol D.
Luo, Xuemei
Balachander, Neeraja
Rosenblatt, Lisa
Mardekian, Jack
Pan, Xianying
Nadkarni, Anagha
Di Fusco, Manuela
Garcia Reeves, Alessandra B.
Yuce, Huseyin
Lip, Gregory Y. H.
Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
title Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
title_full Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
title_fullStr Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
title_short Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
title_sort comparisons between oral anticoagulants among older nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15956
work_keys_str_mv AT deitelzweigsteven comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT keshishianallison comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT lixiaoyan comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT kangamiee comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT dhamaneamold comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT luoxuemei comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT balachanderneeraja comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT rosenblattlisa comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT mardekianjack comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT panxianying comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT nadkarnianagha comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT difuscomanuela comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT garciareevesalessandrab comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT yucehuseyin comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients
AT lipgregoryyh comparisonsbetweenoralanticoagulantsamongoldernonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatients