Cargando…

Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial

AIMS: The efficacy of flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) systems has been demonstrated by improvements in glycaemia; however, during high rates of glucose flux, the performance of continuous glucose monitoring systems was impaired, as detailed in previous studies. This study aimed to determine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moser, Othmar, Eckstein, Max L., McCarthy, Olivia, Deere, Rachel, Pitt, Jason, Williams, David M., Hayes, Jennifer, Sourij, Harald, Bain, Stephen C., Bracken, Richard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13835
_version_ 1783469836696813568
author Moser, Othmar
Eckstein, Max L.
McCarthy, Olivia
Deere, Rachel
Pitt, Jason
Williams, David M.
Hayes, Jennifer
Sourij, Harald
Bain, Stephen C.
Bracken, Richard M.
author_facet Moser, Othmar
Eckstein, Max L.
McCarthy, Olivia
Deere, Rachel
Pitt, Jason
Williams, David M.
Hayes, Jennifer
Sourij, Harald
Bain, Stephen C.
Bracken, Richard M.
author_sort Moser, Othmar
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The efficacy of flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) systems has been demonstrated by improvements in glycaemia; however, during high rates of glucose flux, the performance of continuous glucose monitoring systems was impaired, as detailed in previous studies. This study aimed to determine the performance of the flash GM system during daily‐life glycaemic challenges such as carbohydrate‐rich meals, bolus insulin‐induced glycaemic disturbances and acute physical exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study comprised four randomized trial visits with alternating pre‐ and post‐exercise bolus insulin doses. Throughout the four 14‐hour inpatient phases, 19 participants received three carbohydrate‐rich meals and performed moderate‐intensity exercise. Venous blood glucose and capillary blood glucose during exercise was compared to interstitial glucose concentrations. Flash GM accuracy was assessed by median absolute relative difference (MARD) (interquartile range [IQR]) using the Bland–Altman method and Clark error grid, as well as according to guidelines for integrated CGM approvals (Class II–510(K)). RESULTS: The overall MARD (IQR) during inpatient phases was 14.3% (6.9%–22.8%), during hypoglycaemia (≤3.9 mmol/L) was 31.6% (16.2%–46.8%), during euglycaemia (4.0 mmol/L − 9.9 mmol/L) was 16.0% (8.5%–24.0%) and during hyperglycaemia (≥10 mmol/L) was 9.4% (5.1%–15.7%). Overall Bland–Altman analysis showed a bias (95% LoA) of 1.26 mmol/L (−1.67 to 4.19 mmol/L). The overall MARD during acute exercise was 29.8% (17.5%–39.8%), during hypoglycaemia was 45.1% (35.2%–51.1%), during euglycaemia was 30.7% (18.7%–39.2%) and during hyperglycaemia was 16.3% (10.0%–22.8%). CONCLUSION: Flash GM interstitial glucose readings were not sufficiently accurate within the hypoglycaemic range and during acute exercise and require confirmatory blood glucose measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6852439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68524392019-11-20 Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial Moser, Othmar Eckstein, Max L. McCarthy, Olivia Deere, Rachel Pitt, Jason Williams, David M. Hayes, Jennifer Sourij, Harald Bain, Stephen C. Bracken, Richard M. Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: The efficacy of flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) systems has been demonstrated by improvements in glycaemia; however, during high rates of glucose flux, the performance of continuous glucose monitoring systems was impaired, as detailed in previous studies. This study aimed to determine the performance of the flash GM system during daily‐life glycaemic challenges such as carbohydrate‐rich meals, bolus insulin‐induced glycaemic disturbances and acute physical exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study comprised four randomized trial visits with alternating pre‐ and post‐exercise bolus insulin doses. Throughout the four 14‐hour inpatient phases, 19 participants received three carbohydrate‐rich meals and performed moderate‐intensity exercise. Venous blood glucose and capillary blood glucose during exercise was compared to interstitial glucose concentrations. Flash GM accuracy was assessed by median absolute relative difference (MARD) (interquartile range [IQR]) using the Bland–Altman method and Clark error grid, as well as according to guidelines for integrated CGM approvals (Class II–510(K)). RESULTS: The overall MARD (IQR) during inpatient phases was 14.3% (6.9%–22.8%), during hypoglycaemia (≤3.9 mmol/L) was 31.6% (16.2%–46.8%), during euglycaemia (4.0 mmol/L − 9.9 mmol/L) was 16.0% (8.5%–24.0%) and during hyperglycaemia (≥10 mmol/L) was 9.4% (5.1%–15.7%). Overall Bland–Altman analysis showed a bias (95% LoA) of 1.26 mmol/L (−1.67 to 4.19 mmol/L). The overall MARD during acute exercise was 29.8% (17.5%–39.8%), during hypoglycaemia was 45.1% (35.2%–51.1%), during euglycaemia was 30.7% (18.7%–39.2%) and during hyperglycaemia was 16.3% (10.0%–22.8%). CONCLUSION: Flash GM interstitial glucose readings were not sufficiently accurate within the hypoglycaemic range and during acute exercise and require confirmatory blood glucose measurements. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-08-05 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6852439/ /pubmed/31332929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13835 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Moser, Othmar
Eckstein, Max L.
McCarthy, Olivia
Deere, Rachel
Pitt, Jason
Williams, David M.
Hayes, Jennifer
Sourij, Harald
Bain, Stephen C.
Bracken, Richard M.
Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
title Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
title_full Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
title_fullStr Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
title_short Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
title_sort performance of the freestyle libre flash glucose monitoring (flash gm) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13835
work_keys_str_mv AT moserothmar performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT ecksteinmaxl performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT mccarthyolivia performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT deererachel performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT pittjason performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT williamsdavidm performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT hayesjennifer performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT sourijharald performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT bainstephenc performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT brackenrichardm performanceofthefreestylelibreflashglucosemonitoringflashgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofarandomizedcrossovertrial