Cargando…

Hyperprogression after immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION: Checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate very good anticancer effects, and some patients are long-time responders. As our experience to use these drugs increases, we see more and more patients having different kind of side effects which are usually not seen with chemotherapy. We have observed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbas, Waseem, Rao, Ranga Raju, Popli, Swati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807489
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_389_18
_version_ 1783469882769145856
author Abbas, Waseem
Rao, Ranga Raju
Popli, Swati
author_facet Abbas, Waseem
Rao, Ranga Raju
Popli, Swati
author_sort Abbas, Waseem
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate very good anticancer effects, and some patients are long-time responders. As our experience to use these drugs increases, we see more and more patients having different kind of side effects which are usually not seen with chemotherapy. We have observed a subset of patients who appear to be “hyper-progressors,” with a greatly accelerated rate of tumor growth and clinical deterioration compared to pretherapy, which was also recently reported by Institut Gustave Roussy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records from all patients (N = 50) prospectively treated in our hospital by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 were analyzed. The tumor growth rate (TGR) prior (“REFERENCE;” REF) and upon (“EXPERIMENTAL”; EXP) anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was compared to identify patients with accelerated tumor growth. Associations between TGR and overall survival (OS) were computed. RESULTS: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) was defined as a RECIST progression at the first evaluation and as a ≥2-fold increase of the TGR between the REF and the EXP periods. Of 50 evaluable patients, four patients (8%) were considered as having HPD. At progression, patients with HPD had a higher rate of new lesions. HPD was associated with a worse outcome (OS). CONCLUSION: Hyperprogression was seen in 4 of 50 (8%) of patients, three of which had urothelial cancer and one malignant melanoma, treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Patients, on immunotherapy, qualifying for hyperprogression had shorted OS. It is important to have a better understanding of hyperprogression on immunotherapy which shall be addressed in the ongoing immunotherapy studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6852633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68526332019-12-05 Hyperprogression after immunotherapy Abbas, Waseem Rao, Ranga Raju Popli, Swati South Asian J Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Immuno Oncology INTRODUCTION: Checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate very good anticancer effects, and some patients are long-time responders. As our experience to use these drugs increases, we see more and more patients having different kind of side effects which are usually not seen with chemotherapy. We have observed a subset of patients who appear to be “hyper-progressors,” with a greatly accelerated rate of tumor growth and clinical deterioration compared to pretherapy, which was also recently reported by Institut Gustave Roussy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records from all patients (N = 50) prospectively treated in our hospital by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 were analyzed. The tumor growth rate (TGR) prior (“REFERENCE;” REF) and upon (“EXPERIMENTAL”; EXP) anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was compared to identify patients with accelerated tumor growth. Associations between TGR and overall survival (OS) were computed. RESULTS: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) was defined as a RECIST progression at the first evaluation and as a ≥2-fold increase of the TGR between the REF and the EXP periods. Of 50 evaluable patients, four patients (8%) were considered as having HPD. At progression, patients with HPD had a higher rate of new lesions. HPD was associated with a worse outcome (OS). CONCLUSION: Hyperprogression was seen in 4 of 50 (8%) of patients, three of which had urothelial cancer and one malignant melanoma, treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Patients, on immunotherapy, qualifying for hyperprogression had shorted OS. It is important to have a better understanding of hyperprogression on immunotherapy which shall be addressed in the ongoing immunotherapy studies. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6852633/ /pubmed/31807489 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_389_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The South Asian Journal of Cancer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Immuno Oncology
Abbas, Waseem
Rao, Ranga Raju
Popli, Swati
Hyperprogression after immunotherapy
title Hyperprogression after immunotherapy
title_full Hyperprogression after immunotherapy
title_fullStr Hyperprogression after immunotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Hyperprogression after immunotherapy
title_short Hyperprogression after immunotherapy
title_sort hyperprogression after immunotherapy
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Immuno Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31807489
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_389_18
work_keys_str_mv AT abbaswaseem hyperprogressionafterimmunotherapy
AT raorangaraju hyperprogressionafterimmunotherapy
AT popliswati hyperprogressionafterimmunotherapy