Cargando…

Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector

PURPOSE: Dosimetric properties of the new microSilicon diode detector (60023) have been studied with focus on application in small‐field dosimetry. The influences of the dimensions of the sensitive volume and the density of the epoxy layer surrounding the silicon chip of microSilicon have been quant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schönfeld, Ann‐Britt, Poppinga, Daniela, Kranzer, Rafael, De Wilde, Rudy Leon, Willborn, Kay, Poppe, Björn, Looe, Hui Khee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13710
_version_ 1783469892245127168
author Schönfeld, Ann‐Britt
Poppinga, Daniela
Kranzer, Rafael
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
Willborn, Kay
Poppe, Björn
Looe, Hui Khee
author_facet Schönfeld, Ann‐Britt
Poppinga, Daniela
Kranzer, Rafael
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
Willborn, Kay
Poppe, Björn
Looe, Hui Khee
author_sort Schönfeld, Ann‐Britt
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dosimetric properties of the new microSilicon diode detector (60023) have been studied with focus on application in small‐field dosimetry. The influences of the dimensions of the sensitive volume and the density of the epoxy layer surrounding the silicon chip of microSilicon have been quantified and compared to its predecessor (Diode E 60017) and the microDiamond (60019, all PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). METHODS: Dose linearity has been studied in the range from 0.01 to 8.55 Gy and dose‐per‐pulse dependence from 0.13 to 0.86 mGy/pulse. The effective point of measurement (EPOM) was determined by comparing measured percentage depth dose curves with a reference curve (Roos chamber). Output ratios were measured for nominal field sizes from 0.5 × 0.5  cm(2) to 4 × 4 cm(2). The corresponding small‐field output correction factors, k, were derived with a plastic scintillation detector as reference. The lateral dose–response function, K(x), was determined using a slit beam geometry. RESULTS: MicroSilicon shows linear dose response (R (2) = 1.000) in both low and high dose range up to 8.55 Gy with deviations of only up to 1% within the dose‐per‐pulse values investigated. The EPOM was found to lie (0.7 ± 0.2) mm below the front detector’s surface. The derived k for microSilicon (0.960 at s (eff) = 0.55 cm) is similar to that of microDiamond (0.956), while Diode E requires larger corrections (0.929). This improved behavior of microSilicon in small‐fields is reflected in the slightly wider K(x) compared to Diode E. Furthermore, the amplitude of the negative values in K(x) at the borders of the sensitive volume has been reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to its predecessor, microSilicon shows improved dosimetric behavior with higher sensitivity and smaller dose‐per‐pulse dependence. Profile measurements demonstrated that microSilicon causes less perturbation in off‐axis measurements. It is especially suitable for the applications in small‐field output factors and profile measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6852691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68526912019-11-21 Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector Schönfeld, Ann‐Britt Poppinga, Daniela Kranzer, Rafael De Wilde, Rudy Leon Willborn, Kay Poppe, Björn Looe, Hui Khee Med Phys COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY PURPOSE: Dosimetric properties of the new microSilicon diode detector (60023) have been studied with focus on application in small‐field dosimetry. The influences of the dimensions of the sensitive volume and the density of the epoxy layer surrounding the silicon chip of microSilicon have been quantified and compared to its predecessor (Diode E 60017) and the microDiamond (60019, all PTW‐Freiburg, Germany). METHODS: Dose linearity has been studied in the range from 0.01 to 8.55 Gy and dose‐per‐pulse dependence from 0.13 to 0.86 mGy/pulse. The effective point of measurement (EPOM) was determined by comparing measured percentage depth dose curves with a reference curve (Roos chamber). Output ratios were measured for nominal field sizes from 0.5 × 0.5  cm(2) to 4 × 4 cm(2). The corresponding small‐field output correction factors, k, were derived with a plastic scintillation detector as reference. The lateral dose–response function, K(x), was determined using a slit beam geometry. RESULTS: MicroSilicon shows linear dose response (R (2) = 1.000) in both low and high dose range up to 8.55 Gy with deviations of only up to 1% within the dose‐per‐pulse values investigated. The EPOM was found to lie (0.7 ± 0.2) mm below the front detector’s surface. The derived k for microSilicon (0.960 at s (eff) = 0.55 cm) is similar to that of microDiamond (0.956), while Diode E requires larger corrections (0.929). This improved behavior of microSilicon in small‐fields is reflected in the slightly wider K(x) compared to Diode E. Furthermore, the amplitude of the negative values in K(x) at the borders of the sensitive volume has been reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to its predecessor, microSilicon shows improved dosimetric behavior with higher sensitivity and smaller dose‐per‐pulse dependence. Profile measurements demonstrated that microSilicon causes less perturbation in off‐axis measurements. It is especially suitable for the applications in small‐field output factors and profile measurements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-31 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6852691/ /pubmed/31309594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13710 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AmericanAssociation of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY
Schönfeld, Ann‐Britt
Poppinga, Daniela
Kranzer, Rafael
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
Willborn, Kay
Poppe, Björn
Looe, Hui Khee
Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector
title Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector
title_full Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector
title_fullStr Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector
title_full_unstemmed Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector
title_short Technical Note: Characterization of the new microSilicon diode detector
title_sort technical note: characterization of the new microsilicon diode detector
topic COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31309594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13710
work_keys_str_mv AT schonfeldannbritt technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector
AT poppingadaniela technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector
AT kranzerrafael technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector
AT dewilderudyleon technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector
AT willbornkay technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector
AT poppebjorn technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector
AT looehuikhee technicalnotecharacterizationofthenewmicrosilicondiodedetector