Cargando…
Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The use of digital technology in healthcare has been found to be useful for data collection, provision of health information and communications. Despite increasing use of medical mobile phone applications (apps), by both clinicians and patients, there appears to be a paucity of peer-revi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31718627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0954-1 |
_version_ | 1783469902269513728 |
---|---|
author | Carter, Jenny Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew H. Tribe, Rachel M. |
author_facet | Carter, Jenny Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew H. Tribe, Rachel M. |
author_sort | Carter, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of digital technology in healthcare has been found to be useful for data collection, provision of health information and communications. Despite increasing use of medical mobile phone applications (apps), by both clinicians and patients, there appears to be a paucity of peer-reviewed publications evaluating their use, particularly in pregnancy. This scoping review explored the use of mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy. Specific objectives were to: 1. determine the current landscape of mobile phone app use for clinical decision support in pregnancy; 2. identify perceived benefits and potential hazards of use and 3. identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of these apps into clinical practice. METHODS: Papers eligible for inclusion were primary research or reports on the development and evaluation of apps for use by clinicians for decision support in pregnancy, published in peer-reviewed journals. Research databases included Medline, Embase, PsychoInfo, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the online digital health journals JMIR mHealth and uHealth. Charting and thematic analysis was undertaken using NVivo qualitative data management software and the Framework approach. RESULTS: After screening for eligibility, 13 papers were identified, mainly reporting early stage development of the mobile app, and feasibility or acceptability studies designed to inform further development. Thematic analysis revealed four main themes across the included papers: 1. acceptability and satisfaction; 2. ease of use and portability; 3. multi-functionality and 4. the importance of user involvement in development and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the benefits of mobile apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy and potential barriers to implementation, but reveals a lack of rigorous reporting of evaluation of their use and data security. This situation may change, however, following the issue of FDA and MHRA guidelines and implementation of UK government and other international strategies. Overall, the findings suggest that ease of use, portability and multi-functionality make mobile apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy useful and acceptable tools for clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6852735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68527352019-11-20 Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review Carter, Jenny Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew H. Tribe, Rachel M. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of digital technology in healthcare has been found to be useful for data collection, provision of health information and communications. Despite increasing use of medical mobile phone applications (apps), by both clinicians and patients, there appears to be a paucity of peer-reviewed publications evaluating their use, particularly in pregnancy. This scoping review explored the use of mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy. Specific objectives were to: 1. determine the current landscape of mobile phone app use for clinical decision support in pregnancy; 2. identify perceived benefits and potential hazards of use and 3. identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of these apps into clinical practice. METHODS: Papers eligible for inclusion were primary research or reports on the development and evaluation of apps for use by clinicians for decision support in pregnancy, published in peer-reviewed journals. Research databases included Medline, Embase, PsychoInfo, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the online digital health journals JMIR mHealth and uHealth. Charting and thematic analysis was undertaken using NVivo qualitative data management software and the Framework approach. RESULTS: After screening for eligibility, 13 papers were identified, mainly reporting early stage development of the mobile app, and feasibility or acceptability studies designed to inform further development. Thematic analysis revealed four main themes across the included papers: 1. acceptability and satisfaction; 2. ease of use and portability; 3. multi-functionality and 4. the importance of user involvement in development and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the benefits of mobile apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy and potential barriers to implementation, but reveals a lack of rigorous reporting of evaluation of their use and data security. This situation may change, however, following the issue of FDA and MHRA guidelines and implementation of UK government and other international strategies. Overall, the findings suggest that ease of use, portability and multi-functionality make mobile apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy useful and acceptable tools for clinicians. BioMed Central 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6852735/ /pubmed/31718627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0954-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Carter, Jenny Sandall, Jane Shennan, Andrew H. Tribe, Rachel M. Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
title | Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
title_full | Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
title_short | Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
title_sort | mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31718627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0954-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carterjenny mobilephoneappsforclinicaldecisionsupportinpregnancyascopingreview AT sandalljane mobilephoneappsforclinicaldecisionsupportinpregnancyascopingreview AT shennanandrewh mobilephoneappsforclinicaldecisionsupportinpregnancyascopingreview AT triberachelm mobilephoneappsforclinicaldecisionsupportinpregnancyascopingreview |