Cargando…
Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies. DA...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6109 |
_version_ | 1783469970208849920 |
---|---|
author | Heisser, Thomas Peng, Le Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann |
author_facet | Heisser, Thomas Peng, Le Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann |
author_sort | Heisser, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of identified studies and performed standardised quality ratings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies assessing the outcome of a follow-up colonoscopy among participants at average risk for colorectal cancer with a negative previous colonoscopy (no adenomas). RESULTS: 28 studies were identified, including 22 cohort studies, five cross sectional studies, and one case-control study. Findings for an interval between colonoscopies of one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years were reported by 17, 16, and three studies, respectively. Summary estimates of prevalences of any neoplasm were 20.7% (95% confidence interval 15.8% to 25.5%), 23.0% (18.0% to 28.0%), and 21.9% (14.9% to 29.0%) for one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years between colonoscopies. Corresponding summary estimates of prevalences of any advanced neoplasm were 2.8% (2.0% to 3.7%), 3.2% (2.2% to 4.1%), and 7.0% (5.3% to 8.7%). Seven studies also reported findings stratified by sex. Summary estimates stratified by interval and sex were consistently higher for men than for women. CONCLUSIONS: Although detection of any neoplasms was observed in more than 20% of participants within five years of a negative screening colonoscopy, detection of advanced neoplasms within 10 years was rare. Our findings suggest that 10 year intervals for colonoscopy screening after a negative colonoscopy, as currently recommended, may be adequate, but more studies are needed to strengthen the empirical basis for pertinent recommendations and to investigate even longer intervals. STUDY REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42019127842. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6853024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68530242019-11-13 Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis Heisser, Thomas Peng, Le Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of identified studies and performed standardised quality ratings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies assessing the outcome of a follow-up colonoscopy among participants at average risk for colorectal cancer with a negative previous colonoscopy (no adenomas). RESULTS: 28 studies were identified, including 22 cohort studies, five cross sectional studies, and one case-control study. Findings for an interval between colonoscopies of one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years were reported by 17, 16, and three studies, respectively. Summary estimates of prevalences of any neoplasm were 20.7% (95% confidence interval 15.8% to 25.5%), 23.0% (18.0% to 28.0%), and 21.9% (14.9% to 29.0%) for one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years between colonoscopies. Corresponding summary estimates of prevalences of any advanced neoplasm were 2.8% (2.0% to 3.7%), 3.2% (2.2% to 4.1%), and 7.0% (5.3% to 8.7%). Seven studies also reported findings stratified by sex. Summary estimates stratified by interval and sex were consistently higher for men than for women. CONCLUSIONS: Although detection of any neoplasms was observed in more than 20% of participants within five years of a negative screening colonoscopy, detection of advanced neoplasms within 10 years was rare. Our findings suggest that 10 year intervals for colonoscopy screening after a negative colonoscopy, as currently recommended, may be adequate, but more studies are needed to strengthen the empirical basis for pertinent recommendations and to investigate even longer intervals. STUDY REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42019127842. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6853024/ /pubmed/31722884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6109 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Heisser, Thomas Peng, Le Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heisserthomas outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pengle outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT weiglkorbinian outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hoffmeistermichael outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brennerhermann outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |