Cargando…

Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies. DA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heisser, Thomas, Peng, Le, Weigl, Korbinian, Hoffmeister, Michael, Brenner, Hermann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6109
_version_ 1783469970208849920
author Heisser, Thomas
Peng, Le
Weigl, Korbinian
Hoffmeister, Michael
Brenner, Hermann
author_facet Heisser, Thomas
Peng, Le
Weigl, Korbinian
Hoffmeister, Michael
Brenner, Hermann
author_sort Heisser, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of identified studies and performed standardised quality ratings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies assessing the outcome of a follow-up colonoscopy among participants at average risk for colorectal cancer with a negative previous colonoscopy (no adenomas). RESULTS: 28 studies were identified, including 22 cohort studies, five cross sectional studies, and one case-control study. Findings for an interval between colonoscopies of one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years were reported by 17, 16, and three studies, respectively. Summary estimates of prevalences of any neoplasm were 20.7% (95% confidence interval 15.8% to 25.5%), 23.0% (18.0% to 28.0%), and 21.9% (14.9% to 29.0%) for one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years between colonoscopies. Corresponding summary estimates of prevalences of any advanced neoplasm were 2.8% (2.0% to 3.7%), 3.2% (2.2% to 4.1%), and 7.0% (5.3% to 8.7%). Seven studies also reported findings stratified by sex. Summary estimates stratified by interval and sex were consistently higher for men than for women. CONCLUSIONS: Although detection of any neoplasms was observed in more than 20% of participants within five years of a negative screening colonoscopy, detection of advanced neoplasms within 10 years was rare. Our findings suggest that 10 year intervals for colonoscopy screening after a negative colonoscopy, as currently recommended, may be adequate, but more studies are needed to strengthen the empirical basis for pertinent recommendations and to investigate even longer intervals. STUDY REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42019127842.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68530242019-11-13 Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis Heisser, Thomas Peng, Le Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of identified studies and performed standardised quality ratings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies assessing the outcome of a follow-up colonoscopy among participants at average risk for colorectal cancer with a negative previous colonoscopy (no adenomas). RESULTS: 28 studies were identified, including 22 cohort studies, five cross sectional studies, and one case-control study. Findings for an interval between colonoscopies of one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years were reported by 17, 16, and three studies, respectively. Summary estimates of prevalences of any neoplasm were 20.7% (95% confidence interval 15.8% to 25.5%), 23.0% (18.0% to 28.0%), and 21.9% (14.9% to 29.0%) for one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years between colonoscopies. Corresponding summary estimates of prevalences of any advanced neoplasm were 2.8% (2.0% to 3.7%), 3.2% (2.2% to 4.1%), and 7.0% (5.3% to 8.7%). Seven studies also reported findings stratified by sex. Summary estimates stratified by interval and sex were consistently higher for men than for women. CONCLUSIONS: Although detection of any neoplasms was observed in more than 20% of participants within five years of a negative screening colonoscopy, detection of advanced neoplasms within 10 years was rare. Our findings suggest that 10 year intervals for colonoscopy screening after a negative colonoscopy, as currently recommended, may be adequate, but more studies are needed to strengthen the empirical basis for pertinent recommendations and to investigate even longer intervals. STUDY REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42019127842. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6853024/ /pubmed/31722884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6109 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Heisser, Thomas
Peng, Le
Weigl, Korbinian
Hoffmeister, Michael
Brenner, Hermann
Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6109
work_keys_str_mv AT heisserthomas outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengle outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weiglkorbinian outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hoffmeistermichael outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brennerhermann outcomesatfollowupofnegativecolonoscopyinaverageriskpopulationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis