Cargando…
Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
BACKGROUND. RAS testing is used to select patients with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p‐IGF‐1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728 |
_version_ | 1783469981834412032 |
---|---|
author | García‐Albéniz, Xabier Alonso, Vicente Escudero, Pilar Méndez, Miguel Gallego, Javier Rodríguez, Jose Ramon Salud, Antonia Fernández‐Plana, Julen Manzano, Hermini Zanui, Montserrat Falcó, Ester Feliu, Jaime Gil, Mireia Fernández‐Martos, Carlos Bohn, Uriel Alonso, Carmen Calderero, Verónica Rojo, Federico Cuatrecasas, Miriam Maurel, Joan |
author_facet | García‐Albéniz, Xabier Alonso, Vicente Escudero, Pilar Méndez, Miguel Gallego, Javier Rodríguez, Jose Ramon Salud, Antonia Fernández‐Plana, Julen Manzano, Hermini Zanui, Montserrat Falcó, Ester Feliu, Jaime Gil, Mireia Fernández‐Martos, Carlos Bohn, Uriel Alonso, Carmen Calderero, Verónica Rojo, Federico Cuatrecasas, Miriam Maurel, Joan |
author_sort | García‐Albéniz, Xabier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND. RAS testing is used to select patients with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p‐IGF‐1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively assessed to predict anti‐EGFR resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We designed a multicenter prospective trial (NCT01276379) to evaluate whether the biomarkers BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation/PTEN loss, and DP phenotype can improve the prediction for 12‐months progression‐free survival (PFS) over the use of clinical variables exclusively in patients with RAS wild‐type (WT) mCRC treated with standard chemotherapy plus biweekly cetuximab as first‐line therapy. The planned sample size was 170 RAS WT patients to detect a 20% difference in 12‐month PFS based on the analysis of clinical and selected biomarkers (α = .05, β = .2). The discriminatory capacity of the biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS. We included 181 RAS WT patients. The biomarker distribution was as follows: BRAF mutant, 20 patients (11%); PIK3CA mutated/PTEN loss, 98 patients (58%); DP, 23 patients (12.7%). The clinical variables in the clinical score were progression status >0, left‐sided tumor, and resectable liver metastasis as the only metastatic site. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score containing the clinical variables was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60–0.75). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and BRAF mutational status was 0.68 (0.61–0.75, p = .37). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and PI3KCA mutation/PTEN status was 0.69 (0.61–0.76, p = .32). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and DP phenotype was 0.66 (0.58–0.73, p = .09). CONCLUSION. The addition of BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and DP to a clinical score does not improve the discrimination of 12‐month PFS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. This prospective biomarker design study has important clinical implications because many prospective clinical trials are designed with the hypothesis that BRAF mutation per se and MEK and PIK3CA downstream pathways are critical for colorectal tumor survival. The results lead to the question of whether these pathways should be considered as passengers instead of drivers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6853109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68531092019-11-24 Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) García‐Albéniz, Xabier Alonso, Vicente Escudero, Pilar Méndez, Miguel Gallego, Javier Rodríguez, Jose Ramon Salud, Antonia Fernández‐Plana, Julen Manzano, Hermini Zanui, Montserrat Falcó, Ester Feliu, Jaime Gil, Mireia Fernández‐Martos, Carlos Bohn, Uriel Alonso, Carmen Calderero, Verónica Rojo, Federico Cuatrecasas, Miriam Maurel, Joan Oncologist Gastrointestinal Cancer BACKGROUND. RAS testing is used to select patients with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p‐IGF‐1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively assessed to predict anti‐EGFR resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We designed a multicenter prospective trial (NCT01276379) to evaluate whether the biomarkers BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation/PTEN loss, and DP phenotype can improve the prediction for 12‐months progression‐free survival (PFS) over the use of clinical variables exclusively in patients with RAS wild‐type (WT) mCRC treated with standard chemotherapy plus biweekly cetuximab as first‐line therapy. The planned sample size was 170 RAS WT patients to detect a 20% difference in 12‐month PFS based on the analysis of clinical and selected biomarkers (α = .05, β = .2). The discriminatory capacity of the biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS. We included 181 RAS WT patients. The biomarker distribution was as follows: BRAF mutant, 20 patients (11%); PIK3CA mutated/PTEN loss, 98 patients (58%); DP, 23 patients (12.7%). The clinical variables in the clinical score were progression status >0, left‐sided tumor, and resectable liver metastasis as the only metastatic site. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score containing the clinical variables was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60–0.75). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and BRAF mutational status was 0.68 (0.61–0.75, p = .37). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and PI3KCA mutation/PTEN status was 0.69 (0.61–0.76, p = .32). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and DP phenotype was 0.66 (0.58–0.73, p = .09). CONCLUSION. The addition of BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and DP to a clinical score does not improve the discrimination of 12‐month PFS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. This prospective biomarker design study has important clinical implications because many prospective clinical trials are designed with the hypothesis that BRAF mutation per se and MEK and PIK3CA downstream pathways are critical for colorectal tumor survival. The results lead to the question of whether these pathways should be considered as passengers instead of drivers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-06-24 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6853109/ /pubmed/31235483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Cancer García‐Albéniz, Xabier Alonso, Vicente Escudero, Pilar Méndez, Miguel Gallego, Javier Rodríguez, Jose Ramon Salud, Antonia Fernández‐Plana, Julen Manzano, Hermini Zanui, Montserrat Falcó, Ester Feliu, Jaime Gil, Mireia Fernández‐Martos, Carlos Bohn, Uriel Alonso, Carmen Calderero, Verónica Rojo, Federico Cuatrecasas, Miriam Maurel, Joan Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) |
title | Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) |
title_full | Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) |
title_fullStr | Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) |
title_short | Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) |
title_sort | prospective biomarker study in advanced ras wild‐type colorectal cancer: posiba trial (gemcad 10‐02) |
topic | Gastrointestinal Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciaalbenizxabier prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT alonsovicente prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT escuderopilar prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT mendezmiguel prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT gallegojavier prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT rodriguezjoseramon prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT saludantonia prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT fernandezplanajulen prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT manzanohermini prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT zanuimontserrat prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT falcoester prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT feliujaime prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT gilmireia prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT fernandezmartoscarlos prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT bohnuriel prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT alonsocarmen prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT caldereroveronica prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT rojofederico prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT cuatrecasasmiriam prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 AT maureljoan prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002 |