Cargando…

Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)

BACKGROUND. RAS testing is used to select patients with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p‐IGF‐1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García‐Albéniz, Xabier, Alonso, Vicente, Escudero, Pilar, Méndez, Miguel, Gallego, Javier, Rodríguez, Jose Ramon, Salud, Antonia, Fernández‐Plana, Julen, Manzano, Hermini, Zanui, Montserrat, Falcó, Ester, Feliu, Jaime, Gil, Mireia, Fernández‐Martos, Carlos, Bohn, Uriel, Alonso, Carmen, Calderero, Verónica, Rojo, Federico, Cuatrecasas, Miriam, Maurel, Joan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728
_version_ 1783469981834412032
author García‐Albéniz, Xabier
Alonso, Vicente
Escudero, Pilar
Méndez, Miguel
Gallego, Javier
Rodríguez, Jose Ramon
Salud, Antonia
Fernández‐Plana, Julen
Manzano, Hermini
Zanui, Montserrat
Falcó, Ester
Feliu, Jaime
Gil, Mireia
Fernández‐Martos, Carlos
Bohn, Uriel
Alonso, Carmen
Calderero, Verónica
Rojo, Federico
Cuatrecasas, Miriam
Maurel, Joan
author_facet García‐Albéniz, Xabier
Alonso, Vicente
Escudero, Pilar
Méndez, Miguel
Gallego, Javier
Rodríguez, Jose Ramon
Salud, Antonia
Fernández‐Plana, Julen
Manzano, Hermini
Zanui, Montserrat
Falcó, Ester
Feliu, Jaime
Gil, Mireia
Fernández‐Martos, Carlos
Bohn, Uriel
Alonso, Carmen
Calderero, Verónica
Rojo, Federico
Cuatrecasas, Miriam
Maurel, Joan
author_sort García‐Albéniz, Xabier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. RAS testing is used to select patients with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p‐IGF‐1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively assessed to predict anti‐EGFR resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We designed a multicenter prospective trial (NCT01276379) to evaluate whether the biomarkers BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation/PTEN loss, and DP phenotype can improve the prediction for 12‐months progression‐free survival (PFS) over the use of clinical variables exclusively in patients with RAS wild‐type (WT) mCRC treated with standard chemotherapy plus biweekly cetuximab as first‐line therapy. The planned sample size was 170 RAS WT patients to detect a 20% difference in 12‐month PFS based on the analysis of clinical and selected biomarkers (α = .05, β = .2). The discriminatory capacity of the biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS. We included 181 RAS WT patients. The biomarker distribution was as follows: BRAF mutant, 20 patients (11%); PIK3CA mutated/PTEN loss, 98 patients (58%); DP, 23 patients (12.7%). The clinical variables in the clinical score were progression status >0, left‐sided tumor, and resectable liver metastasis as the only metastatic site. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score containing the clinical variables was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60–0.75). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and BRAF mutational status was 0.68 (0.61–0.75, p = .37). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and PI3KCA mutation/PTEN status was 0.69 (0.61–0.76, p = .32). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and DP phenotype was 0.66 (0.58–0.73, p = .09). CONCLUSION. The addition of BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and DP to a clinical score does not improve the discrimination of 12‐month PFS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. This prospective biomarker design study has important clinical implications because many prospective clinical trials are designed with the hypothesis that BRAF mutation per se and MEK and PIK3CA downstream pathways are critical for colorectal tumor survival. The results lead to the question of whether these pathways should be considered as passengers instead of drivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68531092019-11-24 Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02) García‐Albéniz, Xabier Alonso, Vicente Escudero, Pilar Méndez, Miguel Gallego, Javier Rodríguez, Jose Ramon Salud, Antonia Fernández‐Plana, Julen Manzano, Hermini Zanui, Montserrat Falcó, Ester Feliu, Jaime Gil, Mireia Fernández‐Martos, Carlos Bohn, Uriel Alonso, Carmen Calderero, Verónica Rojo, Federico Cuatrecasas, Miriam Maurel, Joan Oncologist Gastrointestinal Cancer BACKGROUND. RAS testing is used to select patients with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p‐IGF‐1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively assessed to predict anti‐EGFR resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We designed a multicenter prospective trial (NCT01276379) to evaluate whether the biomarkers BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation/PTEN loss, and DP phenotype can improve the prediction for 12‐months progression‐free survival (PFS) over the use of clinical variables exclusively in patients with RAS wild‐type (WT) mCRC treated with standard chemotherapy plus biweekly cetuximab as first‐line therapy. The planned sample size was 170 RAS WT patients to detect a 20% difference in 12‐month PFS based on the analysis of clinical and selected biomarkers (α = .05, β = .2). The discriminatory capacity of the biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS. We included 181 RAS WT patients. The biomarker distribution was as follows: BRAF mutant, 20 patients (11%); PIK3CA mutated/PTEN loss, 98 patients (58%); DP, 23 patients (12.7%). The clinical variables in the clinical score were progression status >0, left‐sided tumor, and resectable liver metastasis as the only metastatic site. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score containing the clinical variables was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60–0.75). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and BRAF mutational status was 0.68 (0.61–0.75, p = .37). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and PI3KCA mutation/PTEN status was 0.69 (0.61–0.76, p = .32). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and DP phenotype was 0.66 (0.58–0.73, p = .09). CONCLUSION. The addition of BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and DP to a clinical score does not improve the discrimination of 12‐month PFS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. This prospective biomarker design study has important clinical implications because many prospective clinical trials are designed with the hypothesis that BRAF mutation per se and MEK and PIK3CA downstream pathways are critical for colorectal tumor survival. The results lead to the question of whether these pathways should be considered as passengers instead of drivers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-06-24 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6853109/ /pubmed/31235483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Cancer
García‐Albéniz, Xabier
Alonso, Vicente
Escudero, Pilar
Méndez, Miguel
Gallego, Javier
Rodríguez, Jose Ramon
Salud, Antonia
Fernández‐Plana, Julen
Manzano, Hermini
Zanui, Montserrat
Falcó, Ester
Feliu, Jaime
Gil, Mireia
Fernández‐Martos, Carlos
Bohn, Uriel
Alonso, Carmen
Calderero, Verónica
Rojo, Federico
Cuatrecasas, Miriam
Maurel, Joan
Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
title Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
title_full Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
title_fullStr Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
title_short Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10‐02)
title_sort prospective biomarker study in advanced ras wild‐type colorectal cancer: posiba trial (gemcad 10‐02)
topic Gastrointestinal Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaalbenizxabier prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT alonsovicente prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT escuderopilar prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT mendezmiguel prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT gallegojavier prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT rodriguezjoseramon prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT saludantonia prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT fernandezplanajulen prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT manzanohermini prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT zanuimontserrat prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT falcoester prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT feliujaime prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT gilmireia prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT fernandezmartoscarlos prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT bohnuriel prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT alonsocarmen prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT caldereroveronica prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT rojofederico prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT cuatrecasasmiriam prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002
AT maureljoan prospectivebiomarkerstudyinadvancedraswildtypecolorectalcancerposibatrialgemcad1002