Cargando…
Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28498615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871 |
_version_ | 1783469989495308288 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Daniel JW Harvey, Kate Harris, John P Butler, Laurie T Vaux, Emma C |
author_facet | Jones, Daniel JW Harvey, Kate Harris, John P Butler, Laurie T Vaux, Emma C |
author_sort | Jones, Daniel JW |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements. BACKGROUND: Depression rates are particularly high in those with end‐stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature. DESIGN: A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient‐focused data; one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with twenty end‐stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre. METHODS: Patients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well‐being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic‐based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well‐being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients’ treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6853155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68531552019-11-21 Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation Jones, Daniel JW Harvey, Kate Harris, John P Butler, Laurie T Vaux, Emma C J Clin Nurs Original Articles AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements. BACKGROUND: Depression rates are particularly high in those with end‐stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature. DESIGN: A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient‐focused data; one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with twenty end‐stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre. METHODS: Patients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well‐being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic‐based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well‐being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients’ treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-03 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6853155/ /pubmed/28498615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Jones, Daniel JW Harvey, Kate Harris, John P Butler, Laurie T Vaux, Emma C Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation |
title | Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation |
title_full | Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation |
title_fullStr | Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation |
title_short | Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation |
title_sort | understanding the impact of haemodialysis on uk national health service patients’ well‐being: a qualitative investigation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28498615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesdanieljw understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation AT harveykate understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation AT harrisjohnp understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation AT butlerlauriet understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation AT vauxemmac understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation |