Cargando…

Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Daniel JW, Harvey, Kate, Harris, John P, Butler, Laurie T, Vaux, Emma C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28498615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871
_version_ 1783469989495308288
author Jones, Daniel JW
Harvey, Kate
Harris, John P
Butler, Laurie T
Vaux, Emma C
author_facet Jones, Daniel JW
Harvey, Kate
Harris, John P
Butler, Laurie T
Vaux, Emma C
author_sort Jones, Daniel JW
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements. BACKGROUND: Depression rates are particularly high in those with end‐stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature. DESIGN: A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient‐focused data; one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with twenty end‐stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre. METHODS: Patients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well‐being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic‐based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well‐being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients’ treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68531552019-11-21 Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation Jones, Daniel JW Harvey, Kate Harris, John P Butler, Laurie T Vaux, Emma C J Clin Nurs Original Articles AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements. BACKGROUND: Depression rates are particularly high in those with end‐stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature. DESIGN: A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient‐focused data; one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with twenty end‐stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre. METHODS: Patients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well‐being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting. CONCLUSIONS: Several of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic‐based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well‐being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients’ treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-03 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6853155/ /pubmed/28498615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jones, Daniel JW
Harvey, Kate
Harris, John P
Butler, Laurie T
Vaux, Emma C
Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
title Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
title_full Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
title_fullStr Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
title_short Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation
title_sort understanding the impact of haemodialysis on uk national health service patients’ well‐being: a qualitative investigation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28498615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdanieljw understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation
AT harveykate understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation
AT harrisjohnp understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation
AT butlerlauriet understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation
AT vauxemmac understandingtheimpactofhaemodialysisonuknationalhealthservicepatientswellbeingaqualitativeinvestigation