Cargando…

Global Estimates of the Energy Transfer From the Wind to the Ocean, With Emphasis on Near‐Inertial Oscillations

Estimates of the kinetic energy transfer from the wind to the ocean are often limited by the spatial and temporal resolution of surface currents and surface winds. Here we examine the wind work in a pair of global, very high‐resolution (1/48° and 1/24°) MIT general circulation model simulations in L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flexas, M. Mar, Thompson, Andrew F., Torres, Hector S., Klein, Patrice, Farrar, J. Thomas, Zhang, Hong, Menemenlis, Dimitris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014453
Descripción
Sumario:Estimates of the kinetic energy transfer from the wind to the ocean are often limited by the spatial and temporal resolution of surface currents and surface winds. Here we examine the wind work in a pair of global, very high‐resolution (1/48° and 1/24°) MIT general circulation model simulations in Latitude‐Longitude‐polar Cap (LLC) configuration that provide hourly output at spatial resolutions of a few kilometers and include tidal forcing. A cospectrum analysis of wind stress and ocean surface currents shows positive contribution at large scales (>300 km) and near‐inertial frequency and negative contribution from mesoscales, tidal frequencies, and internal gravity waves. Larger surface kinetic energy fluxes are in the Kuroshio in winter at large scales (40 mW/m(2)) and mesoscales (−30 mW/m(2)). The Kerguelen region is dominated by large scale (∼20 mW/m(2)), followed by inertial oscillations in summer (13 mW/m(2)) and mesoscale in winter (−12 mW/m(2)). Kinetic energy fluxes from internal gravity waves (−0.1 to −9.9 mW/m(2)) are generally stronger in summer. Surface kinetic energy fluxes in the LLC simulations are 4.71 TW, which is 25–85% higher than previous global estimates from coarser (1/6–1/10°) general ocean circulation models; this is likely due to improved representation of wind variability (6‐hourly, 0.14°, operational European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts). However, the low wind power input to the near‐inertial frequency band obtained with LLC (0.16 TW) compared to global slab models suggests that wind variability on time scales less than 6 hr and spatial scales less than 15 km are critical to better representing the wind power input in ocean circulation models.