Cargando…

Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder

Background: Individuals with a high prevalence of child maltreatment, e.g. those with borderline personality disorder, tend to see neutral facial expressions as negative. Objective: Our aim was to assess whether this bias is present in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and whethe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfaltz, Monique C., Passardi, Sandra, Auschra, Bianca, Fares-Otero, Natalia E., Schnyder, Ulrich, Peyk, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1682929
_version_ 1783469998174371840
author Pfaltz, Monique C.
Passardi, Sandra
Auschra, Bianca
Fares-Otero, Natalia E.
Schnyder, Ulrich
Peyk, Peter
author_facet Pfaltz, Monique C.
Passardi, Sandra
Auschra, Bianca
Fares-Otero, Natalia E.
Schnyder, Ulrich
Peyk, Peter
author_sort Pfaltz, Monique C.
collection PubMed
description Background: Individuals with a high prevalence of child maltreatment, e.g. those with borderline personality disorder, tend to see neutral facial expressions as negative. Objective: Our aim was to assess whether this bias is present in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and whether it is linked to child maltreatment. Methods: Thirty-nine PTSD participants, 44 traumatized and 35 non-traumatized healthy controls watched 300 one-second movies showing 30 neutral and 270 emotional facial expressions, and indicated whether they interpreted each as a neutral or as one of nine emotional expressions. Results: PTSD individuals did not perform differently than the two control groups in the recognition and interpretation of neutral facial expressions (p’s < .300). Higher levels of childhood sexual and emotional abuse, and physical neglect were linked to more interpretations of neutral facial expressions as contempt (p’s < .043), and (for sexual abuse and physical neglect) to more interpretations of neutral facial expressions as anger (p’s < .014). Comparisons of statistical model fits suggested that childhood sexual abuse was the most relevant predictor of recognition accuracy in our sample. Alexithymia, state dissociation, interpersonal trauma, and number of experienced trauma types were not associated with deficits in the interpretation of neutral expressions. Conclusions: Child maltreatment, especially sexual abuse, may shape the interpretation of neutral facial expressions. Future research should explore whether the observed biases extend to real-life situations. If so, therapists might improve the therapeutic relationship with patients with a history of child maltreatment by paying more attention to their own non-verbal communication and their patients’ responses to it. Furthermore, similarly to individuals with high depressive and high social anxiety symptoms, facial expression recognition training might counteract negativity bias in individuals with a history of childhood (sexual and emotional) abuse, and (physical) neglect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68532072019-11-22 Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder Pfaltz, Monique C. Passardi, Sandra Auschra, Bianca Fares-Otero, Natalia E. Schnyder, Ulrich Peyk, Peter Eur J Psychotraumatol Clinical Research Article Background: Individuals with a high prevalence of child maltreatment, e.g. those with borderline personality disorder, tend to see neutral facial expressions as negative. Objective: Our aim was to assess whether this bias is present in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and whether it is linked to child maltreatment. Methods: Thirty-nine PTSD participants, 44 traumatized and 35 non-traumatized healthy controls watched 300 one-second movies showing 30 neutral and 270 emotional facial expressions, and indicated whether they interpreted each as a neutral or as one of nine emotional expressions. Results: PTSD individuals did not perform differently than the two control groups in the recognition and interpretation of neutral facial expressions (p’s < .300). Higher levels of childhood sexual and emotional abuse, and physical neglect were linked to more interpretations of neutral facial expressions as contempt (p’s < .043), and (for sexual abuse and physical neglect) to more interpretations of neutral facial expressions as anger (p’s < .014). Comparisons of statistical model fits suggested that childhood sexual abuse was the most relevant predictor of recognition accuracy in our sample. Alexithymia, state dissociation, interpersonal trauma, and number of experienced trauma types were not associated with deficits in the interpretation of neutral expressions. Conclusions: Child maltreatment, especially sexual abuse, may shape the interpretation of neutral facial expressions. Future research should explore whether the observed biases extend to real-life situations. If so, therapists might improve the therapeutic relationship with patients with a history of child maltreatment by paying more attention to their own non-verbal communication and their patients’ responses to it. Furthermore, similarly to individuals with high depressive and high social anxiety symptoms, facial expression recognition training might counteract negativity bias in individuals with a history of childhood (sexual and emotional) abuse, and (physical) neglect. Taylor & Francis 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6853207/ /pubmed/31762947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1682929 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Pfaltz, Monique C.
Passardi, Sandra
Auschra, Bianca
Fares-Otero, Natalia E.
Schnyder, Ulrich
Peyk, Peter
Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
title Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
title_full Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
title_fullStr Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
title_full_unstemmed Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
title_short Are you angry at me? Negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
title_sort are you angry at me? negative interpretations of neutral facial expressions are linked to child maltreatment but not to posttraumatic stress disorder
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1682929
work_keys_str_mv AT pfaltzmoniquec areyouangryatmenegativeinterpretationsofneutralfacialexpressionsarelinkedtochildmaltreatmentbutnottoposttraumaticstressdisorder
AT passardisandra areyouangryatmenegativeinterpretationsofneutralfacialexpressionsarelinkedtochildmaltreatmentbutnottoposttraumaticstressdisorder
AT auschrabianca areyouangryatmenegativeinterpretationsofneutralfacialexpressionsarelinkedtochildmaltreatmentbutnottoposttraumaticstressdisorder
AT faresoteronataliae areyouangryatmenegativeinterpretationsofneutralfacialexpressionsarelinkedtochildmaltreatmentbutnottoposttraumaticstressdisorder
AT schnyderulrich areyouangryatmenegativeinterpretationsofneutralfacialexpressionsarelinkedtochildmaltreatmentbutnottoposttraumaticstressdisorder
AT peykpeter areyouangryatmenegativeinterpretationsofneutralfacialexpressionsarelinkedtochildmaltreatmentbutnottoposttraumaticstressdisorder