Cargando…

The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata

Tick-borne pathogens (TBP) are a major source of production loss and a welfare concern in livestock across the globe. Consequently, there is a trade-off between keeping animals that are tolerant to TBP infection, but are less productive than more susceptible breeds. Theileria annulata is a major TBP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larcombe, S.D., Kolte, S.W., Ponnudurai, G., Kurkure, N., Magar, S., Velusamy, R., Rani, N., Rubinibala, B., Rekha, B., Alagesan, A., Weir, W., Shiels, B.R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103972
_version_ 1783470014582489088
author Larcombe, S.D.
Kolte, S.W.
Ponnudurai, G.
Kurkure, N.
Magar, S.
Velusamy, R.
Rani, N.
Rubinibala, B.
Rekha, B.
Alagesan, A.
Weir, W.
Shiels, B.R.
author_facet Larcombe, S.D.
Kolte, S.W.
Ponnudurai, G.
Kurkure, N.
Magar, S.
Velusamy, R.
Rani, N.
Rubinibala, B.
Rekha, B.
Alagesan, A.
Weir, W.
Shiels, B.R.
author_sort Larcombe, S.D.
collection PubMed
description Tick-borne pathogens (TBP) are a major source of production loss and a welfare concern in livestock across the globe. Consequently, there is a trade-off between keeping animals that are tolerant to TBP infection, but are less productive than more susceptible breeds. Theileria annulata is a major TBP of bovines, with different host types (i.e. exotic and native cattle breeds, and buffalo) displaying demonstrable differences in clinical susceptibility to infection. However, the extent to which these differences are driven by genetic/physiological differences between hosts, or by different parasite populations/genotypes preferentially establishing infection in different host breeds and species is unclear. In this study, three different bovine host types in India were blood sampled to test for the presence of various TBP, including Theileria annulata, to determine whether native cattle (Bos indicus breeds), crossbreed cattle (Bos taurus x Bos indicus breeds) or water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) differ in the physiological consequences of infection. Population genetic analyses of T. annulata isolated from the three different host types was also performed, using a panel of mini- and micro-satellite markers, to test for sub-structuring of the parasite population among host types. We discovered that compared to other host types, “carrier” crossbreed cattle showed a higher level of haematological pathology when infected with T. annulata. Despite this finding, we found no evidence for differences in the genotypes of T. annulata infecting different host types, although buffalo appeared to harbour fewer mixed parasite genotype infections, indicating they are not the major reservoir of parasite diversity. The apparent tolerance/resistance of native breed cattle and buffalo to the impacts of T. annulata infection is thus most likely to be driven by host genotype, rather than differences in the parasite population. Our results suggest that an improved understanding of the genetic factors that underpin disease resistance could help to ameliorate future economic loss due to TBP or tropical theileriosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68532752019-11-20 The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata Larcombe, S.D. Kolte, S.W. Ponnudurai, G. Kurkure, N. Magar, S. Velusamy, R. Rani, N. Rubinibala, B. Rekha, B. Alagesan, A. Weir, W. Shiels, B.R. Infect Genet Evol Article Tick-borne pathogens (TBP) are a major source of production loss and a welfare concern in livestock across the globe. Consequently, there is a trade-off between keeping animals that are tolerant to TBP infection, but are less productive than more susceptible breeds. Theileria annulata is a major TBP of bovines, with different host types (i.e. exotic and native cattle breeds, and buffalo) displaying demonstrable differences in clinical susceptibility to infection. However, the extent to which these differences are driven by genetic/physiological differences between hosts, or by different parasite populations/genotypes preferentially establishing infection in different host breeds and species is unclear. In this study, three different bovine host types in India were blood sampled to test for the presence of various TBP, including Theileria annulata, to determine whether native cattle (Bos indicus breeds), crossbreed cattle (Bos taurus x Bos indicus breeds) or water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) differ in the physiological consequences of infection. Population genetic analyses of T. annulata isolated from the three different host types was also performed, using a panel of mini- and micro-satellite markers, to test for sub-structuring of the parasite population among host types. We discovered that compared to other host types, “carrier” crossbreed cattle showed a higher level of haematological pathology when infected with T. annulata. Despite this finding, we found no evidence for differences in the genotypes of T. annulata infecting different host types, although buffalo appeared to harbour fewer mixed parasite genotype infections, indicating they are not the major reservoir of parasite diversity. The apparent tolerance/resistance of native breed cattle and buffalo to the impacts of T. annulata infection is thus most likely to be driven by host genotype, rather than differences in the parasite population. Our results suggest that an improved understanding of the genetic factors that underpin disease resistance could help to ameliorate future economic loss due to TBP or tropical theileriosis. Elsevier Science 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6853275/ /pubmed/31344487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103972 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Larcombe, S.D.
Kolte, S.W.
Ponnudurai, G.
Kurkure, N.
Magar, S.
Velusamy, R.
Rani, N.
Rubinibala, B.
Rekha, B.
Alagesan, A.
Weir, W.
Shiels, B.R.
The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata
title The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata
title_full The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata
title_fullStr The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata
title_full_unstemmed The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata
title_short The impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in Indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of Theileria annulata
title_sort impact of tick-borne pathogen infection in indian bovines is determined by host type but not the genotype of theileria annulata
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103972
work_keys_str_mv AT larcombesd theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT koltesw theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT ponnuduraig theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT kurkuren theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT magars theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT velusamyr theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT ranin theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT rubinibalab theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT rekhab theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT alagesana theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT weirw theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT shielsbr theimpactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT larcombesd impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT koltesw impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT ponnuduraig impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT kurkuren impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT magars impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT velusamyr impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT ranin impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT rubinibalab impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT rekhab impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT alagesana impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT weirw impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata
AT shielsbr impactoftickbornepathogeninfectioninindianbovinesisdeterminedbyhosttypebutnotthegenotypeoftheileriaannulata