Cargando…
16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
Repeated quantitative measurement of bacterial DNA on whole blood has been shown to be a promising method for monitoring bloodstream infection (BSI) with selected bacterial species. To enable broad use of this method, we developed a quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method for 16S rDNA. It wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224656 |
_version_ | 1783470028512821248 |
---|---|
author | Ziegler, Ingrid Lindström, Sofia Källgren, Magdalena Strålin, Kristoffer Mölling, Paula |
author_facet | Ziegler, Ingrid Lindström, Sofia Källgren, Magdalena Strålin, Kristoffer Mölling, Paula |
author_sort | Ziegler, Ingrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repeated quantitative measurement of bacterial DNA on whole blood has been shown to be a promising method for monitoring bloodstream infection (BSI) with selected bacterial species. To enable broad use of this method, we developed a quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method for 16S rDNA. It was validated with species-specific ddPCRs for Staphylococcus aureus (nuc), Streptococcus pneumoniae (lytA), and Escherichia coli (uidA) on spiked whole blood samples and on repeated whole blood samples (days 0, 1–2, 3–4, 6–8, and 13–15) from 83 patients with BSI with these pathogens. In these patients, 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA were detected in 60% and 61%, respectively, at least at one time-point. The highest positivity rates were seen in S. aureus BSI, where 92% of the patients were 16S rDNA-positive and 85% nuc-positive. Quantitative 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA showed strong correlations in spiked samples (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001) and clinical samples (r = 0.84; p < 0.0001). Positivity for 16S rDNA was rapidly cleared in patients with S. pneumoniae and E. coli BSI, but more slowly and sometimes persisted, in those with S. aureus BSI. The initial 16S rDNA load was higher in BSI patients with sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition) than without sepsis (median 2.38 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.031) and in non-survivors than in survivors (median 2.83 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.006). 16S rDNA ddPCR appears to be a promising method for bacterial DNA monitoring during BSI. The clinical value of such monitoring should be further studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6853374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68533742019-11-22 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections Ziegler, Ingrid Lindström, Sofia Källgren, Magdalena Strålin, Kristoffer Mölling, Paula PLoS One Research Article Repeated quantitative measurement of bacterial DNA on whole blood has been shown to be a promising method for monitoring bloodstream infection (BSI) with selected bacterial species. To enable broad use of this method, we developed a quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method for 16S rDNA. It was validated with species-specific ddPCRs for Staphylococcus aureus (nuc), Streptococcus pneumoniae (lytA), and Escherichia coli (uidA) on spiked whole blood samples and on repeated whole blood samples (days 0, 1–2, 3–4, 6–8, and 13–15) from 83 patients with BSI with these pathogens. In these patients, 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA were detected in 60% and 61%, respectively, at least at one time-point. The highest positivity rates were seen in S. aureus BSI, where 92% of the patients were 16S rDNA-positive and 85% nuc-positive. Quantitative 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA showed strong correlations in spiked samples (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001) and clinical samples (r = 0.84; p < 0.0001). Positivity for 16S rDNA was rapidly cleared in patients with S. pneumoniae and E. coli BSI, but more slowly and sometimes persisted, in those with S. aureus BSI. The initial 16S rDNA load was higher in BSI patients with sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition) than without sepsis (median 2.38 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.031) and in non-survivors than in survivors (median 2.83 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.006). 16S rDNA ddPCR appears to be a promising method for bacterial DNA monitoring during BSI. The clinical value of such monitoring should be further studied. Public Library of Science 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6853374/ /pubmed/31721817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224656 Text en © 2019 Ziegler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ziegler, Ingrid Lindström, Sofia Källgren, Magdalena Strålin, Kristoffer Mölling, Paula 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections |
title | 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections |
title_full | 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections |
title_fullStr | 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections |
title_short | 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections |
title_sort | 16s rdna droplet digital pcr for monitoring bacterial dnaemia in bloodstream infections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ziegleringrid 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections AT lindstromsofia 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections AT kallgrenmagdalena 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections AT stralinkristoffer 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections AT mollingpaula 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections |