Cargando…

16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections

Repeated quantitative measurement of bacterial DNA on whole blood has been shown to be a promising method for monitoring bloodstream infection (BSI) with selected bacterial species. To enable broad use of this method, we developed a quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method for 16S rDNA. It wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziegler, Ingrid, Lindström, Sofia, Källgren, Magdalena, Strålin, Kristoffer, Mölling, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224656
_version_ 1783470028512821248
author Ziegler, Ingrid
Lindström, Sofia
Källgren, Magdalena
Strålin, Kristoffer
Mölling, Paula
author_facet Ziegler, Ingrid
Lindström, Sofia
Källgren, Magdalena
Strålin, Kristoffer
Mölling, Paula
author_sort Ziegler, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description Repeated quantitative measurement of bacterial DNA on whole blood has been shown to be a promising method for monitoring bloodstream infection (BSI) with selected bacterial species. To enable broad use of this method, we developed a quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method for 16S rDNA. It was validated with species-specific ddPCRs for Staphylococcus aureus (nuc), Streptococcus pneumoniae (lytA), and Escherichia coli (uidA) on spiked whole blood samples and on repeated whole blood samples (days 0, 1–2, 3–4, 6–8, and 13–15) from 83 patients with BSI with these pathogens. In these patients, 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA were detected in 60% and 61%, respectively, at least at one time-point. The highest positivity rates were seen in S. aureus BSI, where 92% of the patients were 16S rDNA-positive and 85% nuc-positive. Quantitative 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA showed strong correlations in spiked samples (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001) and clinical samples (r = 0.84; p < 0.0001). Positivity for 16S rDNA was rapidly cleared in patients with S. pneumoniae and E. coli BSI, but more slowly and sometimes persisted, in those with S. aureus BSI. The initial 16S rDNA load was higher in BSI patients with sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition) than without sepsis (median 2.38 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.031) and in non-survivors than in survivors (median 2.83 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.006). 16S rDNA ddPCR appears to be a promising method for bacterial DNA monitoring during BSI. The clinical value of such monitoring should be further studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68533742019-11-22 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections Ziegler, Ingrid Lindström, Sofia Källgren, Magdalena Strålin, Kristoffer Mölling, Paula PLoS One Research Article Repeated quantitative measurement of bacterial DNA on whole blood has been shown to be a promising method for monitoring bloodstream infection (BSI) with selected bacterial species. To enable broad use of this method, we developed a quantitative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) method for 16S rDNA. It was validated with species-specific ddPCRs for Staphylococcus aureus (nuc), Streptococcus pneumoniae (lytA), and Escherichia coli (uidA) on spiked whole blood samples and on repeated whole blood samples (days 0, 1–2, 3–4, 6–8, and 13–15) from 83 patients with BSI with these pathogens. In these patients, 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA were detected in 60% and 61%, respectively, at least at one time-point. The highest positivity rates were seen in S. aureus BSI, where 92% of the patients were 16S rDNA-positive and 85% nuc-positive. Quantitative 16S rDNA and species-specific DNA showed strong correlations in spiked samples (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001) and clinical samples (r = 0.84; p < 0.0001). Positivity for 16S rDNA was rapidly cleared in patients with S. pneumoniae and E. coli BSI, but more slowly and sometimes persisted, in those with S. aureus BSI. The initial 16S rDNA load was higher in BSI patients with sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition) than without sepsis (median 2.38 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.031) and in non-survivors than in survivors (median 2.83 vs. 0 lg10 copies/mL; p = 0.006). 16S rDNA ddPCR appears to be a promising method for bacterial DNA monitoring during BSI. The clinical value of such monitoring should be further studied. Public Library of Science 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6853374/ /pubmed/31721817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224656 Text en © 2019 Ziegler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ziegler, Ingrid
Lindström, Sofia
Källgren, Magdalena
Strålin, Kristoffer
Mölling, Paula
16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
title 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
title_full 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
title_fullStr 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
title_full_unstemmed 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
title_short 16S rDNA droplet digital PCR for monitoring bacterial DNAemia in bloodstream infections
title_sort 16s rdna droplet digital pcr for monitoring bacterial dnaemia in bloodstream infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31721817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224656
work_keys_str_mv AT ziegleringrid 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections
AT lindstromsofia 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections
AT kallgrenmagdalena 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections
AT stralinkristoffer 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections
AT mollingpaula 16srdnadropletdigitalpcrformonitoringbacterialdnaemiainbloodstreaminfections