Cargando…

Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)

BACKGROUND: Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanna, Julie, Mosher, Mathew, Whidden, Paul, Nguyen, Sébastien, Garzon, Diego, Bhogal, Meetu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy289
_version_ 1783470076120268800
author Khanna, Julie
Mosher, Mathew
Whidden, Paul
Nguyen, Sébastien
Garzon, Diego
Bhogal, Meetu
author_facet Khanna, Julie
Mosher, Mathew
Whidden, Paul
Nguyen, Sébastien
Garzon, Diego
Bhogal, Meetu
author_sort Khanna, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian sites reviewed medical records and patient-completed questionnaires of women who underwent primary breast augmentation with smooth or textured Natrelle Inspira implants containing TruForm 1 or TruForm 2 gel. Patients were aged ≥22 years, received implants via inframammary fold incision, and returned for follow-up at 2 to 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 319 women received Inspira implants (smooth TruForm 2, n = 205; textured TruForm 2, n = 99; smooth or textured TruForm 1, n = 15). At follow-up, 30 women (9.4%) had undergone reoperation, including 19 (9.3%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 9 (9.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. The mean time to reoperation was 1.2 years; the risk rate for reoperation was 9.9% at 3 years. The most common reasons for reoperation were implant malposition (36.7%), capsular contracture (33.3%), and the patient’s request for a change in implant size or style (20.0%). Most women were very or somewhat satisfied with the initial surgery (89.3% overall; 90.7% smooth TruForm 2; 86.9% textured TruForm 2). Thirty-four women (10.7%) reported adverse events, including 20 (9.8%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 14 (14.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that Natrelle Inspira TruForm 2 implants are safe when used in primary breast augmentation, resulting in low reoperation rates that are consistent with those for other breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68536552019-11-19 Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) Khanna, Julie Mosher, Mathew Whidden, Paul Nguyen, Sébastien Garzon, Diego Bhogal, Meetu Aesthet Surg J Breast Surgery BACKGROUND: Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian sites reviewed medical records and patient-completed questionnaires of women who underwent primary breast augmentation with smooth or textured Natrelle Inspira implants containing TruForm 1 or TruForm 2 gel. Patients were aged ≥22 years, received implants via inframammary fold incision, and returned for follow-up at 2 to 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 319 women received Inspira implants (smooth TruForm 2, n = 205; textured TruForm 2, n = 99; smooth or textured TruForm 1, n = 15). At follow-up, 30 women (9.4%) had undergone reoperation, including 19 (9.3%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 9 (9.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. The mean time to reoperation was 1.2 years; the risk rate for reoperation was 9.9% at 3 years. The most common reasons for reoperation were implant malposition (36.7%), capsular contracture (33.3%), and the patient’s request for a change in implant size or style (20.0%). Most women were very or somewhat satisfied with the initial surgery (89.3% overall; 90.7% smooth TruForm 2; 86.9% textured TruForm 2). Thirty-four women (10.7%) reported adverse events, including 20 (9.8%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 14 (14.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that Natrelle Inspira TruForm 2 implants are safe when used in primary breast augmentation, resulting in low reoperation rates that are consistent with those for other breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: [Image: see text] Oxford University Press 2019-11 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6853655/ /pubmed/30383228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy289 Text en © 2018 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Breast Surgery
Khanna, Julie
Mosher, Mathew
Whidden, Paul
Nguyen, Sébastien
Garzon, Diego
Bhogal, Meetu
Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
title Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
title_full Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
title_fullStr Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
title_full_unstemmed Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
title_short Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
title_sort reoperation rate after primary augmentation with smooth, textured, high fill, cohesive, round breast implants (ranbi-i study)
topic Breast Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy289
work_keys_str_mv AT khannajulie reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy
AT moshermathew reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy
AT whiddenpaul reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy
AT nguyensebastien reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy
AT garzondiego reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy
AT bhogalmeetu reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy