Cargando…
Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study)
BACKGROUND: Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy289 |
_version_ | 1783470076120268800 |
---|---|
author | Khanna, Julie Mosher, Mathew Whidden, Paul Nguyen, Sébastien Garzon, Diego Bhogal, Meetu |
author_facet | Khanna, Julie Mosher, Mathew Whidden, Paul Nguyen, Sébastien Garzon, Diego Bhogal, Meetu |
author_sort | Khanna, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian sites reviewed medical records and patient-completed questionnaires of women who underwent primary breast augmentation with smooth or textured Natrelle Inspira implants containing TruForm 1 or TruForm 2 gel. Patients were aged ≥22 years, received implants via inframammary fold incision, and returned for follow-up at 2 to 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 319 women received Inspira implants (smooth TruForm 2, n = 205; textured TruForm 2, n = 99; smooth or textured TruForm 1, n = 15). At follow-up, 30 women (9.4%) had undergone reoperation, including 19 (9.3%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 9 (9.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. The mean time to reoperation was 1.2 years; the risk rate for reoperation was 9.9% at 3 years. The most common reasons for reoperation were implant malposition (36.7%), capsular contracture (33.3%), and the patient’s request for a change in implant size or style (20.0%). Most women were very or somewhat satisfied with the initial surgery (89.3% overall; 90.7% smooth TruForm 2; 86.9% textured TruForm 2). Thirty-four women (10.7%) reported adverse events, including 20 (9.8%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 14 (14.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that Natrelle Inspira TruForm 2 implants are safe when used in primary breast augmentation, resulting in low reoperation rates that are consistent with those for other breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6853655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68536552019-11-19 Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) Khanna, Julie Mosher, Mathew Whidden, Paul Nguyen, Sébastien Garzon, Diego Bhogal, Meetu Aesthet Surg J Breast Surgery BACKGROUND: Reoperation after primary breast augmentation remains an important clinical issue. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate incidence and causes of reoperation in patients who underwent primary augmentation. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study conducted at 16 Canadian sites reviewed medical records and patient-completed questionnaires of women who underwent primary breast augmentation with smooth or textured Natrelle Inspira implants containing TruForm 1 or TruForm 2 gel. Patients were aged ≥22 years, received implants via inframammary fold incision, and returned for follow-up at 2 to 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 319 women received Inspira implants (smooth TruForm 2, n = 205; textured TruForm 2, n = 99; smooth or textured TruForm 1, n = 15). At follow-up, 30 women (9.4%) had undergone reoperation, including 19 (9.3%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 9 (9.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. The mean time to reoperation was 1.2 years; the risk rate for reoperation was 9.9% at 3 years. The most common reasons for reoperation were implant malposition (36.7%), capsular contracture (33.3%), and the patient’s request for a change in implant size or style (20.0%). Most women were very or somewhat satisfied with the initial surgery (89.3% overall; 90.7% smooth TruForm 2; 86.9% textured TruForm 2). Thirty-four women (10.7%) reported adverse events, including 20 (9.8%) in the smooth TruForm 2 subgroup and 14 (14.1%) in the textured TruForm 2 subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that Natrelle Inspira TruForm 2 implants are safe when used in primary breast augmentation, resulting in low reoperation rates that are consistent with those for other breast implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: [Image: see text] Oxford University Press 2019-11 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6853655/ /pubmed/30383228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy289 Text en © 2018 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Breast Surgery Khanna, Julie Mosher, Mathew Whidden, Paul Nguyen, Sébastien Garzon, Diego Bhogal, Meetu Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) |
title | Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) |
title_full | Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) |
title_fullStr | Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) |
title_short | Reoperation Rate After Primary Augmentation With Smooth, Textured, High Fill, Cohesive, Round Breast Implants (RANBI-I Study) |
title_sort | reoperation rate after primary augmentation with smooth, textured, high fill, cohesive, round breast implants (ranbi-i study) |
topic | Breast Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khannajulie reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy AT moshermathew reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy AT whiddenpaul reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy AT nguyensebastien reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy AT garzondiego reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy AT bhogalmeetu reoperationrateafterprimaryaugmentationwithsmoothtexturedhighfillcohesiveroundbreastimplantsranbiistudy |