Cargando…

Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy

INTRODUCTION: Congenital hydronephrosis (CH) is a condition with dilated renal pelvis with or without dilation of renal calyces. AIM: To examine the role of magnetic resonance urography in the detection of congenital hydronephrosis in comparison to dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS). PATIENTS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dzananovic, Amra, Begic, Amela, Pokrajac, Danka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762575
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.181-185
_version_ 1783470092696158208
author Dzananovic, Amra
Begic, Amela
Pokrajac, Danka
author_facet Dzananovic, Amra
Begic, Amela
Pokrajac, Danka
author_sort Dzananovic, Amra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Congenital hydronephrosis (CH) is a condition with dilated renal pelvis with or without dilation of renal calyces. AIM: To examine the role of magnetic resonance urography in the detection of congenital hydronephrosis in comparison to dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resarch included 58 (n=58) patients with diagnosis of congenital unilateral or bilateral dilatation of kidney duct system. Each patient had a one-time or multiple hospitalization at the Nephrology Department of the Pediatric Clinic, with performed: ultrasound which confirmed CH, voiding cystourethrography / voiding urosonography was confirmed based on which the vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was established / excluded, dynamic renal scintigraphy and magnetic urography (analysis was made by CHOP-fMRU software) on the basis of which the uterine anatomy and the relative renal function were evaluated. RESULTS: Male patients were represented in 40 cases (69%). The average age was 4.4 ± 4.3 years with the youngest patient at the age of 2 months, and the oldest was 17 years old. According to diagnostic entities, the most common diagnosis was ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction in over half of cases (30 or 51.7%), followed by subjects with ureterovesical junction (UVJ) obstruction (11 or 19%), VUR was recorded in 9 (15.5%) cases, and pyelon fissus in 7 (12.1%), and one case (1.7%) was recorded with bilateral megaureter. Comparison of the value of the renal function obtained with DRS and CHOP-fMRU methods shows that there were no statistically significant differences between two methods. In the case of right kidney, the mean DRS value was 53.4 ± 18.4% (range 13-100%), while CHOP-fMRU was 51.8 ± 22.4 (range 0-96.7%). In the case of left kidney, the average value according to the DRS method was 46.9 ± 18.9% (range 0-87%) and according to CHOP-fMRU 47.6 ± 21.5% (range 8.3-100%). The correlation coefficients of both right and left kidneys show a highly statistically significant correlation between these two methods. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance urography in the pediatric population in CH based on results should be an integral part of the management of these patients, especially in congenital obstructive uropathy, in complex and associated congenital anomalies, as it provides morphological and functional data on the state of the kidneys and urinary tract.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Academy of Medical sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68537532019-11-22 Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy Dzananovic, Amra Begic, Amela Pokrajac, Danka Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Congenital hydronephrosis (CH) is a condition with dilated renal pelvis with or without dilation of renal calyces. AIM: To examine the role of magnetic resonance urography in the detection of congenital hydronephrosis in comparison to dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resarch included 58 (n=58) patients with diagnosis of congenital unilateral or bilateral dilatation of kidney duct system. Each patient had a one-time or multiple hospitalization at the Nephrology Department of the Pediatric Clinic, with performed: ultrasound which confirmed CH, voiding cystourethrography / voiding urosonography was confirmed based on which the vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was established / excluded, dynamic renal scintigraphy and magnetic urography (analysis was made by CHOP-fMRU software) on the basis of which the uterine anatomy and the relative renal function were evaluated. RESULTS: Male patients were represented in 40 cases (69%). The average age was 4.4 ± 4.3 years with the youngest patient at the age of 2 months, and the oldest was 17 years old. According to diagnostic entities, the most common diagnosis was ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction in over half of cases (30 or 51.7%), followed by subjects with ureterovesical junction (UVJ) obstruction (11 or 19%), VUR was recorded in 9 (15.5%) cases, and pyelon fissus in 7 (12.1%), and one case (1.7%) was recorded with bilateral megaureter. Comparison of the value of the renal function obtained with DRS and CHOP-fMRU methods shows that there were no statistically significant differences between two methods. In the case of right kidney, the mean DRS value was 53.4 ± 18.4% (range 13-100%), while CHOP-fMRU was 51.8 ± 22.4 (range 0-96.7%). In the case of left kidney, the average value according to the DRS method was 46.9 ± 18.9% (range 0-87%) and according to CHOP-fMRU 47.6 ± 21.5% (range 8.3-100%). The correlation coefficients of both right and left kidneys show a highly statistically significant correlation between these two methods. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance urography in the pediatric population in CH based on results should be an integral part of the management of these patients, especially in congenital obstructive uropathy, in complex and associated congenital anomalies, as it provides morphological and functional data on the state of the kidneys and urinary tract. Academy of Medical sciences 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6853753/ /pubmed/31762575 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.181-185 Text en © 2019 Amra Dzananovic, Amela Begic, Danka Pokrajac http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Dzananovic, Amra
Begic, Amela
Pokrajac, Danka
Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy
title Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy
title_full Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy
title_fullStr Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy
title_short Evaluation of Congenital Hydronephrosis with Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Urography in Comparation to Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy
title_sort evaluation of congenital hydronephrosis with static and dynamic magnetic resonance urography in comparation to dynamic renal scintigraphy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762575
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.181-185
work_keys_str_mv AT dzananovicamra evaluationofcongenitalhydronephrosiswithstaticanddynamicmagneticresonanceurographyincomparationtodynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT begicamela evaluationofcongenitalhydronephrosiswithstaticanddynamicmagneticresonanceurographyincomparationtodynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT pokrajacdanka evaluationofcongenitalhydronephrosiswithstaticanddynamicmagneticresonanceurographyincomparationtodynamicrenalscintigraphy