Cargando…

Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal

BACKGROUND: Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anal canal are rare and there is no international consensus on their second‐line management. 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy is the standard for locally advanced forms but its efficacy in metastatic sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saint, Angélique, Evesque, Ludovic, Falk, Alexander T., Cavaglione, Gérard, Montagne, Lucile, Benezery, Karen, Francois, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31524335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2558
_version_ 1783470107711766528
author Saint, Angélique
Evesque, Ludovic
Falk, Alexander T.
Cavaglione, Gérard
Montagne, Lucile
Benezery, Karen
Francois, Eric
author_facet Saint, Angélique
Evesque, Ludovic
Falk, Alexander T.
Cavaglione, Gérard
Montagne, Lucile
Benezery, Karen
Francois, Eric
author_sort Saint, Angélique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anal canal are rare and there is no international consensus on their second‐line management. 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy is the standard for locally advanced forms but its efficacy in metastatic stage has never been evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective analysis of patients treated with 5‐FU and mitomycin from 2000 to 2017 in our institution for a metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum‐based regimen. The main outcome was progression‐free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: Nineteen patients, 15 women and four men, with a median age of 57 years were identified (range, 40‐79 years). Patients received a median of three cycles (1‐7) of mitomycin 5‐FU. A dose reduction was necessary in six patients (31.6%), one patient had to discontinue treatment following toxicity and no death was due to treatment toxicity was reported. An objective response was observed in five patients (26.4%, 95% CI 6.6‐46.2) including one complete response, six patients (31.6%, 95% CI 10.7‐52.5) showed tumor stabilization. Median PFS and OS were 3 months [95% CI 1‐5] and 7 months [95% CI 2.2‐11.8]. Responder had a median duration of response of 4 months [95% CI 1.8‐6.1] and one patient had 23 months duration of response. No significant difference was noted for PFS and OS for patients previously treated with mitomycin and 5‐FU at a local stage. CONCLUSION: Mitomycin and 5‐FU regimen provides tumor control with acceptable tolerance. It is an option for patients with metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum‐based chemotherapy. [Correction added on 9 October 2019, after first online publication: '5‐FU' was inadvertently removed from the Results and Conclusion and has now been added to the text.]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68538312019-12-16 Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal Saint, Angélique Evesque, Ludovic Falk, Alexander T. Cavaglione, Gérard Montagne, Lucile Benezery, Karen Francois, Eric Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anal canal are rare and there is no international consensus on their second‐line management. 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy is the standard for locally advanced forms but its efficacy in metastatic stage has never been evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective analysis of patients treated with 5‐FU and mitomycin from 2000 to 2017 in our institution for a metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum‐based regimen. The main outcome was progression‐free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. RESULTS: Nineteen patients, 15 women and four men, with a median age of 57 years were identified (range, 40‐79 years). Patients received a median of three cycles (1‐7) of mitomycin 5‐FU. A dose reduction was necessary in six patients (31.6%), one patient had to discontinue treatment following toxicity and no death was due to treatment toxicity was reported. An objective response was observed in five patients (26.4%, 95% CI 6.6‐46.2) including one complete response, six patients (31.6%, 95% CI 10.7‐52.5) showed tumor stabilization. Median PFS and OS were 3 months [95% CI 1‐5] and 7 months [95% CI 2.2‐11.8]. Responder had a median duration of response of 4 months [95% CI 1.8‐6.1] and one patient had 23 months duration of response. No significant difference was noted for PFS and OS for patients previously treated with mitomycin and 5‐FU at a local stage. CONCLUSION: Mitomycin and 5‐FU regimen provides tumor control with acceptable tolerance. It is an option for patients with metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum‐based chemotherapy. [Correction added on 9 October 2019, after first online publication: '5‐FU' was inadvertently removed from the Results and Conclusion and has now been added to the text.] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6853831/ /pubmed/31524335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Saint, Angélique
Evesque, Ludovic
Falk, Alexander T.
Cavaglione, Gérard
Montagne, Lucile
Benezery, Karen
Francois, Eric
Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
title Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
title_full Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
title_fullStr Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
title_full_unstemmed Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
title_short Mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
title_sort mitomycin and 5‐fluorouracil for second‐line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31524335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2558
work_keys_str_mv AT saintangelique mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal
AT evesqueludovic mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal
AT falkalexandert mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal
AT cavaglionegerard mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal
AT montagnelucile mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal
AT benezerykaren mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal
AT francoiseric mitomycinand5fluorouracilforsecondlinetreatmentofmetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomasoftheanalcanal