Cargando…

The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns

Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kojima, Sho, Miyaguchi, Shota, Sasaki, Ryoki, Tsuiki, Shota, Saito, Kei, Inukai, Yasuto, Otsuru, Naofumi, Onishi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2
_version_ 1783470143346573312
author Kojima, Sho
Miyaguchi, Shota
Sasaki, Ryoki
Tsuiki, Shota
Saito, Kei
Inukai, Yasuto
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
author_facet Kojima, Sho
Miyaguchi, Shota
Sasaki, Ryoki
Tsuiki, Shota
Saito, Kei
Inukai, Yasuto
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
author_sort Kojima, Sho
collection PubMed
description Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on different pin protrusions patterns. This single-blind study included 18 healthy subjects. Two types of MS interventions were used: repetitive global stimulus (RGS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, and sequential stepwise displacement stimulus (SSDS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of 6 pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. MS interventions were applied to the right index finger for 20 min (stim on/stim off, 1 s/5 s) at a frequency of 20 Hz. After RGS intervention, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcranial magnetic stimulation were observed to be significantly smaller than pre-intervention MEPs; however, motor function using the grooved pegboard task remained unchanged. After SSDS intervention, MEPs were significantly larger and motor function significantly improved compared with pre-intervention values. Our results demonstrated that MS intervention can modulate corticospinal excitability and motor function and that the effects of MS intervention depend on MS intervention patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6853977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68539772019-11-19 The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns Kojima, Sho Miyaguchi, Shota Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki Sci Rep Article Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on different pin protrusions patterns. This single-blind study included 18 healthy subjects. Two types of MS interventions were used: repetitive global stimulus (RGS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, and sequential stepwise displacement stimulus (SSDS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of 6 pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. MS interventions were applied to the right index finger for 20 min (stim on/stim off, 1 s/5 s) at a frequency of 20 Hz. After RGS intervention, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcranial magnetic stimulation were observed to be significantly smaller than pre-intervention MEPs; however, motor function using the grooved pegboard task remained unchanged. After SSDS intervention, MEPs were significantly larger and motor function significantly improved compared with pre-intervention values. Our results demonstrated that MS intervention can modulate corticospinal excitability and motor function and that the effects of MS intervention depend on MS intervention patterns. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6853977/ /pubmed/31723202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kojima, Sho
Miyaguchi, Shota
Sasaki, Ryoki
Tsuiki, Shota
Saito, Kei
Inukai, Yasuto
Otsuru, Naofumi
Onishi, Hideaki
The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
title The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
title_full The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
title_fullStr The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
title_full_unstemmed The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
title_short The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
title_sort effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kojimasho theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT miyaguchishota theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT sasakiryoki theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT tsuikishota theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT saitokei theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT inukaiyasuto theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT otsurunaofumi theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT onishihideaki theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT kojimasho effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT miyaguchishota effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT sasakiryoki effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT tsuikishota effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT saitokei effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT inukaiyasuto effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT otsurunaofumi effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns
AT onishihideaki effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns