Cargando…
The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns
Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2 |
_version_ | 1783470143346573312 |
---|---|
author | Kojima, Sho Miyaguchi, Shota Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki |
author_facet | Kojima, Sho Miyaguchi, Shota Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki |
author_sort | Kojima, Sho |
collection | PubMed |
description | Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on different pin protrusions patterns. This single-blind study included 18 healthy subjects. Two types of MS interventions were used: repetitive global stimulus (RGS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, and sequential stepwise displacement stimulus (SSDS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of 6 pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. MS interventions were applied to the right index finger for 20 min (stim on/stim off, 1 s/5 s) at a frequency of 20 Hz. After RGS intervention, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcranial magnetic stimulation were observed to be significantly smaller than pre-intervention MEPs; however, motor function using the grooved pegboard task remained unchanged. After SSDS intervention, MEPs were significantly larger and motor function significantly improved compared with pre-intervention values. Our results demonstrated that MS intervention can modulate corticospinal excitability and motor function and that the effects of MS intervention depend on MS intervention patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6853977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68539772019-11-19 The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns Kojima, Sho Miyaguchi, Shota Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki Sci Rep Article Somatosensory stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability. Mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) activates cortical activity depending on tactile stimulation patterns. In this study, we examined whether the effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on different pin protrusions patterns. This single-blind study included 18 healthy subjects. Two types of MS interventions were used: repetitive global stimulus (RGS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, and sequential stepwise displacement stimulus (SSDS) intervention was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of 6 pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. MS interventions were applied to the right index finger for 20 min (stim on/stim off, 1 s/5 s) at a frequency of 20 Hz. After RGS intervention, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcranial magnetic stimulation were observed to be significantly smaller than pre-intervention MEPs; however, motor function using the grooved pegboard task remained unchanged. After SSDS intervention, MEPs were significantly larger and motor function significantly improved compared with pre-intervention values. Our results demonstrated that MS intervention can modulate corticospinal excitability and motor function and that the effects of MS intervention depend on MS intervention patterns. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6853977/ /pubmed/31723202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kojima, Sho Miyaguchi, Shota Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Otsuru, Naofumi Onishi, Hideaki The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
title | The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
title_full | The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
title_fullStr | The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
title_short | The effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
title_sort | effects of mechanical tactile stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor function depend on pin protrusion patterns |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6853977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31723202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53275-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kojimasho theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT miyaguchishota theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT sasakiryoki theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT tsuikishota theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT saitokei theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT inukaiyasuto theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT otsurunaofumi theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT onishihideaki theeffectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT kojimasho effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT miyaguchishota effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT sasakiryoki effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT tsuikishota effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT saitokei effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT inukaiyasuto effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT otsurunaofumi effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns AT onishihideaki effectsofmechanicaltactilestimulationoncorticospinalexcitabilityandmotorfunctiondependonpinprotrusionpatterns |