Cargando…

3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Many cardiac catheter interventions require accurate discrimination between healthy and infarcted myocardia. The gold standard for infarct imaging is late gadolinium–enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), but during cardiac procedures electroanatomical or electromechanical mapping (EAM or EMM, respectively) is usu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Broek, Hans Thijs, Wenker, Steven, van de Leur, Rutger, Doevendans, Pieter A., Chamuleau, Steven A.J., van Slochteren, Frebus J., van Es, René
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w
_version_ 1783470160677437440
author van den Broek, Hans Thijs
Wenker, Steven
van de Leur, Rutger
Doevendans, Pieter A.
Chamuleau, Steven A.J.
van Slochteren, Frebus J.
van Es, René
author_facet van den Broek, Hans Thijs
Wenker, Steven
van de Leur, Rutger
Doevendans, Pieter A.
Chamuleau, Steven A.J.
van Slochteren, Frebus J.
van Es, René
author_sort van den Broek, Hans Thijs
collection PubMed
description Many cardiac catheter interventions require accurate discrimination between healthy and infarcted myocardia. The gold standard for infarct imaging is late gadolinium–enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), but during cardiac procedures electroanatomical or electromechanical mapping (EAM or EMM, respectively) is usually employed. We aimed to improve the ability of EMM to identify myocardial infarction by combining multiple EMM parameters in a statistical model. From a porcine infarction model, 3D electromechanical maps were 3D registered to LGE-MRI. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model was fitted to predict the presence of infarct based on EMM parameters. Furthermore, we correlated feature-tracking strain parameters to EMM measures of local mechanical deformation. We registered 787 EMM points from 13 animals to the corresponding MRI locations. The mean registration error was 2.5 ± 1.16 mm. Our model showed a strong ability to predict the presence of infarction (C-statistic = 0.85). Strain parameters were only weakly correlated to EMM measures. The model is accurate in discriminating infarcted from healthy myocardium. Unipolar and bipolar voltages were the strongest predictors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6854049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68540492019-12-03 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging van den Broek, Hans Thijs Wenker, Steven van de Leur, Rutger Doevendans, Pieter A. Chamuleau, Steven A.J. van Slochteren, Frebus J. van Es, René J Cardiovasc Transl Res Original Article Many cardiac catheter interventions require accurate discrimination between healthy and infarcted myocardia. The gold standard for infarct imaging is late gadolinium–enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), but during cardiac procedures electroanatomical or electromechanical mapping (EAM or EMM, respectively) is usually employed. We aimed to improve the ability of EMM to identify myocardial infarction by combining multiple EMM parameters in a statistical model. From a porcine infarction model, 3D electromechanical maps were 3D registered to LGE-MRI. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model was fitted to predict the presence of infarct based on EMM parameters. Furthermore, we correlated feature-tracking strain parameters to EMM measures of local mechanical deformation. We registered 787 EMM points from 13 animals to the corresponding MRI locations. The mean registration error was 2.5 ± 1.16 mm. Our model showed a strong ability to predict the presence of infarction (C-statistic = 0.85). Strain parameters were only weakly correlated to EMM measures. The model is accurate in discriminating infarcted from healthy myocardium. Unipolar and bipolar voltages were the strongest predictors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-07-23 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6854049/ /pubmed/31338795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
van den Broek, Hans Thijs
Wenker, Steven
van de Leur, Rutger
Doevendans, Pieter A.
Chamuleau, Steven A.J.
van Slochteren, Frebus J.
van Es, René
3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort 3d myocardial scar prediction model derived from multimodality analysis of electromechanical mapping and magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbroekhansthijs 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wenkersteven 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT vandeleurrutger 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT doevendanspietera 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT chamuleaustevenaj 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT vanslochterenfrebusj 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT vanesrene 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging