Cargando…
3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Many cardiac catheter interventions require accurate discrimination between healthy and infarcted myocardia. The gold standard for infarct imaging is late gadolinium–enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), but during cardiac procedures electroanatomical or electromechanical mapping (EAM or EMM, respectively) is usu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w |
_version_ | 1783470160677437440 |
---|---|
author | van den Broek, Hans Thijs Wenker, Steven van de Leur, Rutger Doevendans, Pieter A. Chamuleau, Steven A.J. van Slochteren, Frebus J. van Es, René |
author_facet | van den Broek, Hans Thijs Wenker, Steven van de Leur, Rutger Doevendans, Pieter A. Chamuleau, Steven A.J. van Slochteren, Frebus J. van Es, René |
author_sort | van den Broek, Hans Thijs |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many cardiac catheter interventions require accurate discrimination between healthy and infarcted myocardia. The gold standard for infarct imaging is late gadolinium–enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), but during cardiac procedures electroanatomical or electromechanical mapping (EAM or EMM, respectively) is usually employed. We aimed to improve the ability of EMM to identify myocardial infarction by combining multiple EMM parameters in a statistical model. From a porcine infarction model, 3D electromechanical maps were 3D registered to LGE-MRI. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model was fitted to predict the presence of infarct based on EMM parameters. Furthermore, we correlated feature-tracking strain parameters to EMM measures of local mechanical deformation. We registered 787 EMM points from 13 animals to the corresponding MRI locations. The mean registration error was 2.5 ± 1.16 mm. Our model showed a strong ability to predict the presence of infarction (C-statistic = 0.85). Strain parameters were only weakly correlated to EMM measures. The model is accurate in discriminating infarcted from healthy myocardium. Unipolar and bipolar voltages were the strongest predictors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6854049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68540492019-12-03 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging van den Broek, Hans Thijs Wenker, Steven van de Leur, Rutger Doevendans, Pieter A. Chamuleau, Steven A.J. van Slochteren, Frebus J. van Es, René J Cardiovasc Transl Res Original Article Many cardiac catheter interventions require accurate discrimination between healthy and infarcted myocardia. The gold standard for infarct imaging is late gadolinium–enhanced MRI (LGE-MRI), but during cardiac procedures electroanatomical or electromechanical mapping (EAM or EMM, respectively) is usually employed. We aimed to improve the ability of EMM to identify myocardial infarction by combining multiple EMM parameters in a statistical model. From a porcine infarction model, 3D electromechanical maps were 3D registered to LGE-MRI. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model was fitted to predict the presence of infarct based on EMM parameters. Furthermore, we correlated feature-tracking strain parameters to EMM measures of local mechanical deformation. We registered 787 EMM points from 13 animals to the corresponding MRI locations. The mean registration error was 2.5 ± 1.16 mm. Our model showed a strong ability to predict the presence of infarction (C-statistic = 0.85). Strain parameters were only weakly correlated to EMM measures. The model is accurate in discriminating infarcted from healthy myocardium. Unipolar and bipolar voltages were the strongest predictors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-07-23 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6854049/ /pubmed/31338795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van den Broek, Hans Thijs Wenker, Steven van de Leur, Rutger Doevendans, Pieter A. Chamuleau, Steven A.J. van Slochteren, Frebus J. van Es, René 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full | 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short | 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | 3d myocardial scar prediction model derived from multimodality analysis of electromechanical mapping and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31338795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09899-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbroekhansthijs 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging AT wenkersteven 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging AT vandeleurrutger 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging AT doevendanspietera 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging AT chamuleaustevenaj 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging AT vanslochterenfrebusj 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging AT vanesrene 3dmyocardialscarpredictionmodelderivedfrommultimodalityanalysisofelectromechanicalmappingandmagneticresonanceimaging |