Cargando…
Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries
BACKGROUND: Caesarean section is recommended in situations in which vaginal birth presents a greater likelihood of adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes than normal. However, it is associated with a higher risk of complications, especially when performed without a clear medical indication. Since la...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0832-4 |
_version_ | 1783470271715344384 |
---|---|
author | de Souza, Hayala C. C. Perdoná, Gleici S. C. Marcolin, Alessandra C. Oyeneyin, Lawal O. Oladapo, Olufemi T. Mugerwa, Kidza Souza, João Paulo |
author_facet | de Souza, Hayala C. C. Perdoná, Gleici S. C. Marcolin, Alessandra C. Oyeneyin, Lawal O. Oladapo, Olufemi T. Mugerwa, Kidza Souza, João Paulo |
author_sort | de Souza, Hayala C. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Caesarean section is recommended in situations in which vaginal birth presents a greater likelihood of adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes than normal. However, it is associated with a higher risk of complications, especially when performed without a clear medical indication. Since labour attendants have no standardised clinical method to assist in this decision, statistical tools developed based on multiple labour variables may be an alternative. The objective of this paper was to develop and evaluate the accuracy of models for caesarean section prediction using maternal and foetal characteristics collected at admission and through labour. METHOD: This is a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization’s Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. Data were collected from women admitted for labour and childbirth in 13 hospitals in Nigeria as well as Uganda between 2014 and 2015. We applied logistic regression to develop different models to predict caesarean section, based on the time when intrapartum assessment was made. To evaluate discriminatory capacity of the various models, we calculated: area under the curve, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 8957 pregnant women with 12.67% of caesarean births were used for model development. The model based on labour admission characteristics showed an area under the curve of 78.70%, sensitivity of 63.20%, specificity of 78.68% and accuracy of 76.62%. On the other hand, the models that applied intrapartum assessments performed better, with an area under the curve of 93.66%, sensitivity of 80.12%, specificity of 89.26% and accuracy of 88.03%. CONCLUSION: It is possible to predict the likelihood of intrapartum caesarean section with high accuracy based on labour characteristics and events. However, the accuracy of this prediction is considerably higher when based on information obtained throughout the course of labour. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6854746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68547462019-11-21 Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries de Souza, Hayala C. C. Perdoná, Gleici S. C. Marcolin, Alessandra C. Oyeneyin, Lawal O. Oladapo, Olufemi T. Mugerwa, Kidza Souza, João Paulo Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Caesarean section is recommended in situations in which vaginal birth presents a greater likelihood of adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes than normal. However, it is associated with a higher risk of complications, especially when performed without a clear medical indication. Since labour attendants have no standardised clinical method to assist in this decision, statistical tools developed based on multiple labour variables may be an alternative. The objective of this paper was to develop and evaluate the accuracy of models for caesarean section prediction using maternal and foetal characteristics collected at admission and through labour. METHOD: This is a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization’s Better Outcomes in Labour Difficulty prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries. Data were collected from women admitted for labour and childbirth in 13 hospitals in Nigeria as well as Uganda between 2014 and 2015. We applied logistic regression to develop different models to predict caesarean section, based on the time when intrapartum assessment was made. To evaluate discriminatory capacity of the various models, we calculated: area under the curve, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 8957 pregnant women with 12.67% of caesarean births were used for model development. The model based on labour admission characteristics showed an area under the curve of 78.70%, sensitivity of 63.20%, specificity of 78.68% and accuracy of 76.62%. On the other hand, the models that applied intrapartum assessments performed better, with an area under the curve of 93.66%, sensitivity of 80.12%, specificity of 89.26% and accuracy of 88.03%. CONCLUSION: It is possible to predict the likelihood of intrapartum caesarean section with high accuracy based on labour characteristics and events. However, the accuracy of this prediction is considerably higher when based on information obtained throughout the course of labour. BioMed Central 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6854746/ /pubmed/31727102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0832-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research de Souza, Hayala C. C. Perdoná, Gleici S. C. Marcolin, Alessandra C. Oyeneyin, Lawal O. Oladapo, Olufemi T. Mugerwa, Kidza Souza, João Paulo Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
title | Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
title_full | Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
title_fullStr | Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
title_short | Development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-Saharan African countries |
title_sort | development of caesarean section prediction models: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in two sub-saharan african countries |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0832-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desouzahayalacc developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries AT perdonagleicisc developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries AT marcolinalessandrac developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries AT oyeneyinlawalo developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries AT oladapoolufemit developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries AT mugerwakidza developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries AT souzajoaopaulo developmentofcaesareansectionpredictionmodelssecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudyintwosubsaharanafricancountries |