Cargando…
Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3 |
_version_ | 1783470279808253952 |
---|---|
author | Nagata, Kosei Yamada, Koji Shinozaki, Tomohiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Tokimura, Fumiaki Oka, Hiroyuki Tajiri, Yasuhito Tanaka, Sakae Okazaki, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Nagata, Kosei Yamada, Koji Shinozaki, Tomohiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Tokimura, Fumiaki Oka, Hiroyuki Tajiri, Yasuhito Tanaka, Sakae Okazaki, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Nagata, Kosei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend additional AMP after closure, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society permit the use of postoperative AMP, but recommend discontinuation within 24 h. Similarly, the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japan Society for Surgical Infection also permit AMP within 24–48 h after various orthopaedic procedures. In these guidelines, recommendations regarding AMP duration were weak due to a relative lack of evidence, and currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing AMP use within 24 h versus 24–48 h regarding orthopaedic procedures. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and respiratory tract infection (RTI) are also important health care-associated infections (HAIs) faced after surgery. Although AMP duration may affect these HAIs, its effects have not been well evaluated. METHODS: We have organized a multicenter, prospective, cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial to examine the non-inferiority of shorter AMP duration (within 24 h) against longer duration (24–48 h) in preventing postoperative HAIs. Participating facilities will be divided into two groups. In Group 24, AMP will be discontinued within 24 h after surgery. In Group 48, AMP will be discontinued within 24–48 h after surgery. The group allocation will be switched every 2 months until the targeted recruitment (500 participants per group) is met. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of all HAIs (SSI, UTI, RTI, and other infectious diseases), which require antibiotic therapies within 30 days after surgery. In addition to mortality and cardiovascular events, prolonged hospitalization (> 30 days) and the rate of antibiotic resistance rate of SSI pathogens will also be evaluated. Outcomes will be evaluated within 30–180 days after surgery in person by the surgeon, by mail, or by telephone survey. Data will be analyzed by a statistician not engaged in data collection. DISCUSSION: This study may provide valuable information for developing future recommendations for adequate AMP duration after clean orthopaedic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030929, registered January 22, 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6854781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68547812019-11-21 Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis Nagata, Kosei Yamada, Koji Shinozaki, Tomohiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Tokimura, Fumiaki Oka, Hiroyuki Tajiri, Yasuhito Tanaka, Sakae Okazaki, Hiroshi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend additional AMP after closure, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society permit the use of postoperative AMP, but recommend discontinuation within 24 h. Similarly, the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japan Society for Surgical Infection also permit AMP within 24–48 h after various orthopaedic procedures. In these guidelines, recommendations regarding AMP duration were weak due to a relative lack of evidence, and currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing AMP use within 24 h versus 24–48 h regarding orthopaedic procedures. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and respiratory tract infection (RTI) are also important health care-associated infections (HAIs) faced after surgery. Although AMP duration may affect these HAIs, its effects have not been well evaluated. METHODS: We have organized a multicenter, prospective, cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial to examine the non-inferiority of shorter AMP duration (within 24 h) against longer duration (24–48 h) in preventing postoperative HAIs. Participating facilities will be divided into two groups. In Group 24, AMP will be discontinued within 24 h after surgery. In Group 48, AMP will be discontinued within 24–48 h after surgery. The group allocation will be switched every 2 months until the targeted recruitment (500 participants per group) is met. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of all HAIs (SSI, UTI, RTI, and other infectious diseases), which require antibiotic therapies within 30 days after surgery. In addition to mortality and cardiovascular events, prolonged hospitalization (> 30 days) and the rate of antibiotic resistance rate of SSI pathogens will also be evaluated. Outcomes will be evaluated within 30–180 days after surgery in person by the surgeon, by mail, or by telephone survey. Data will be analyzed by a statistician not engaged in data collection. DISCUSSION: This study may provide valuable information for developing future recommendations for adequate AMP duration after clean orthopaedic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030929, registered January 22, 2018. BioMed Central 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6854781/ /pubmed/31722700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Nagata, Kosei Yamada, Koji Shinozaki, Tomohiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Tokimura, Fumiaki Oka, Hiroyuki Tajiri, Yasuhito Tanaka, Sakae Okazaki, Hiroshi Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
title | Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
title_full | Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
title_short | Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
title_sort | non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (nocota study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagatakosei noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT yamadakoji noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT shinozakitomohiro noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT miyazakitsuyoshi noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT tokimurafumiaki noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT okahiroyuki noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT tajiriyasuhito noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT tanakasakae noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis AT okazakihiroshi noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis |