Cargando…

Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagata, Kosei, Yamada, Koji, Shinozaki, Tomohiro, Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi, Tokimura, Fumiaki, Oka, Hiroyuki, Tajiri, Yasuhito, Tanaka, Sakae, Okazaki, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3
_version_ 1783470279808253952
author Nagata, Kosei
Yamada, Koji
Shinozaki, Tomohiro
Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi
Tokimura, Fumiaki
Oka, Hiroyuki
Tajiri, Yasuhito
Tanaka, Sakae
Okazaki, Hiroshi
author_facet Nagata, Kosei
Yamada, Koji
Shinozaki, Tomohiro
Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi
Tokimura, Fumiaki
Oka, Hiroyuki
Tajiri, Yasuhito
Tanaka, Sakae
Okazaki, Hiroshi
author_sort Nagata, Kosei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend additional AMP after closure, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society permit the use of postoperative AMP, but recommend discontinuation within 24 h. Similarly, the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japan Society for Surgical Infection also permit AMP within 24–48 h after various orthopaedic procedures. In these guidelines, recommendations regarding AMP duration were weak due to a relative lack of evidence, and currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing AMP use within 24 h versus 24–48 h regarding orthopaedic procedures. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and respiratory tract infection (RTI) are also important health care-associated infections (HAIs) faced after surgery. Although AMP duration may affect these HAIs, its effects have not been well evaluated. METHODS: We have organized a multicenter, prospective, cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial to examine the non-inferiority of shorter AMP duration (within 24 h) against longer duration (24–48 h) in preventing postoperative HAIs. Participating facilities will be divided into two groups. In Group 24, AMP will be discontinued within 24 h after surgery. In Group 48, AMP will be discontinued within 24–48 h after surgery. The group allocation will be switched every 2 months until the targeted recruitment (500 participants per group) is met. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of all HAIs (SSI, UTI, RTI, and other infectious diseases), which require antibiotic therapies within 30 days after surgery. In addition to mortality and cardiovascular events, prolonged hospitalization (> 30 days) and the rate of antibiotic resistance rate of SSI pathogens will also be evaluated. Outcomes will be evaluated within 30–180 days after surgery in person by the surgeon, by mail, or by telephone survey. Data will be analyzed by a statistician not engaged in data collection. DISCUSSION: This study may provide valuable information for developing future recommendations for adequate AMP duration after clean orthopaedic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030929, registered January 22, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6854781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68547812019-11-21 Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis Nagata, Kosei Yamada, Koji Shinozaki, Tomohiro Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi Tokimura, Fumiaki Oka, Hiroyuki Tajiri, Yasuhito Tanaka, Sakae Okazaki, Hiroshi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is one of the most important measures for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs); however, controversies remain regarding its adequate duration. Although the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention do not recommend additional AMP after closure, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Musculoskeletal Infection Society permit the use of postoperative AMP, but recommend discontinuation within 24 h. Similarly, the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japan Society for Surgical Infection also permit AMP within 24–48 h after various orthopaedic procedures. In these guidelines, recommendations regarding AMP duration were weak due to a relative lack of evidence, and currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing AMP use within 24 h versus 24–48 h regarding orthopaedic procedures. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and respiratory tract infection (RTI) are also important health care-associated infections (HAIs) faced after surgery. Although AMP duration may affect these HAIs, its effects have not been well evaluated. METHODS: We have organized a multicenter, prospective, cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial to examine the non-inferiority of shorter AMP duration (within 24 h) against longer duration (24–48 h) in preventing postoperative HAIs. Participating facilities will be divided into two groups. In Group 24, AMP will be discontinued within 24 h after surgery. In Group 48, AMP will be discontinued within 24–48 h after surgery. The group allocation will be switched every 2 months until the targeted recruitment (500 participants per group) is met. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence of all HAIs (SSI, UTI, RTI, and other infectious diseases), which require antibiotic therapies within 30 days after surgery. In addition to mortality and cardiovascular events, prolonged hospitalization (> 30 days) and the rate of antibiotic resistance rate of SSI pathogens will also be evaluated. Outcomes will be evaluated within 30–180 days after surgery in person by the surgeon, by mail, or by telephone survey. Data will be analyzed by a statistician not engaged in data collection. DISCUSSION: This study may provide valuable information for developing future recommendations for adequate AMP duration after clean orthopaedic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030929, registered January 22, 2018. BioMed Central 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6854781/ /pubmed/31722700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nagata, Kosei
Yamada, Koji
Shinozaki, Tomohiro
Miyazaki, Tsuyoshi
Tokimura, Fumiaki
Oka, Hiroyuki
Tajiri, Yasuhito
Tanaka, Sakae
Okazaki, Hiroshi
Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
title Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
title_full Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
title_fullStr Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
title_short Non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (NOCOTA study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
title_sort non-inferior comparative study comparing one or two day antimicrobial prophylaxis after clean orthopaedic surgery (nocota study): a study protocol for a cluster pseudo-randomized controlled trial comparing duration of antibiotic prophylaxis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2879-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nagatakosei noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT yamadakoji noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT shinozakitomohiro noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT miyazakitsuyoshi noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT tokimurafumiaki noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT okahiroyuki noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT tajiriyasuhito noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT tanakasakae noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis
AT okazakihiroshi noninferiorcomparativestudycomparingoneortwodayantimicrobialprophylaxisaftercleanorthopaedicsurgerynocotastudyastudyprotocolforaclusterpseudorandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingdurationofantibioticprophylaxis