Cargando…

Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT-IC) boost and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in patients treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a retrospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delgado, Diogo, Figueiredo, André, Mendonça, Vera, Jorge, Marília, Abdulrehman, Miriam, de Pina, Maria Filomena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749849
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88116
_version_ 1783470297906675712
author Delgado, Diogo
Figueiredo, André
Mendonça, Vera
Jorge, Marília
Abdulrehman, Miriam
de Pina, Maria Filomena
author_facet Delgado, Diogo
Figueiredo, André
Mendonça, Vera
Jorge, Marília
Abdulrehman, Miriam
de Pina, Maria Filomena
author_sort Delgado, Diogo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT-IC) boost and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in patients treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a retrospective review of 92 patients with stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy between 2008 and 2013. All patients received pelvic 3D conformal EBRT (range, 45-50.4 Gy) concomitant with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)), and a BT-IC boost (37 patients: 4 fractions of 6 Gy prescribed to a point A) to the tumor or a 3D conformal EBRT boost (55 patients: 16.2 Gy), if the former was not technically feasible. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates for both groups were 68% and 55%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were better and statistically significant in the BT-IC group with 82% and 79%, respectively, as compared to the EBRT group with 58% and 38%, respectively. In multivariate analysis controlling for maximum tumor dimension, lymph node status, and FIGO stage, EBRT boost was associated with a statistical significant increase in the risk of recurrence (HR: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.27-10.02; p = 0.016) and a trend towards an increase in the risk of death (HR: 3.14; 95% CI: 0.97-10.17; p = 0.056). Lymph node status was also significantly associated with a greater risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: BT-IC boost was associated with a lower recurrence rate and better overall survival and recurrence-free survival. EBRT boost patients had a three-fold increase in the risk of recurrence. Brachytherapy is essential in the treatment of cervical cancer and improved alternatives are needed for patients who are not candidates for standard brachytherapy applicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6854858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68548582019-11-20 Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy Delgado, Diogo Figueiredo, André Mendonça, Vera Jorge, Marília Abdulrehman, Miriam de Pina, Maria Filomena J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT-IC) boost and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in patients treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a retrospective review of 92 patients with stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy between 2008 and 2013. All patients received pelvic 3D conformal EBRT (range, 45-50.4 Gy) concomitant with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)), and a BT-IC boost (37 patients: 4 fractions of 6 Gy prescribed to a point A) to the tumor or a 3D conformal EBRT boost (55 patients: 16.2 Gy), if the former was not technically feasible. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates for both groups were 68% and 55%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were better and statistically significant in the BT-IC group with 82% and 79%, respectively, as compared to the EBRT group with 58% and 38%, respectively. In multivariate analysis controlling for maximum tumor dimension, lymph node status, and FIGO stage, EBRT boost was associated with a statistical significant increase in the risk of recurrence (HR: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.27-10.02; p = 0.016) and a trend towards an increase in the risk of death (HR: 3.14; 95% CI: 0.97-10.17; p = 0.056). Lymph node status was also significantly associated with a greater risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: BT-IC boost was associated with a lower recurrence rate and better overall survival and recurrence-free survival. EBRT boost patients had a three-fold increase in the risk of recurrence. Brachytherapy is essential in the treatment of cervical cancer and improved alternatives are needed for patients who are not candidates for standard brachytherapy applicators. Termedia Publishing House 2019-10-30 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6854858/ /pubmed/31749849 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88116 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Delgado, Diogo
Figueiredo, André
Mendonça, Vera
Jorge, Marília
Abdulrehman, Miriam
de Pina, Maria Filomena
Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
title Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
title_full Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
title_fullStr Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
title_short Results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
title_sort results from chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cervical cancer with or without intracavitary brachytherapy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749849
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88116
work_keys_str_mv AT delgadodiogo resultsfromchemoradiotherapyforsquamouscellcervicalcancerwithorwithoutintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT figueiredoandre resultsfromchemoradiotherapyforsquamouscellcervicalcancerwithorwithoutintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT mendoncavera resultsfromchemoradiotherapyforsquamouscellcervicalcancerwithorwithoutintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT jorgemarilia resultsfromchemoradiotherapyforsquamouscellcervicalcancerwithorwithoutintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT abdulrehmanmiriam resultsfromchemoradiotherapyforsquamouscellcervicalcancerwithorwithoutintracavitarybrachytherapy
AT depinamariafilomena resultsfromchemoradiotherapyforsquamouscellcervicalcancerwithorwithoutintracavitarybrachytherapy