Cargando…

Evaluation of deformable image registration algorithm for determination of accumulated dose for brachytherapy of cervical cancer patients

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the dose accumulation (DA) of bladder and rectum between brachytherapy fractions using hybrid-based deformable image registration (DIR) and compare it with the simple summation (SS) approach of GEC-ESTRO in cervical cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi, Reza, Mahdavi, Seied Rabi, Jaberi, Ramin, Siavashpour, Zahra, Janani, Leila, Meigooni, Ali Soleimani, Reiazi, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749857
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88762
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the dose accumulation (DA) of bladder and rectum between brachytherapy fractions using hybrid-based deformable image registration (DIR) and compare it with the simple summation (SS) approach of GEC-ESTRO in cervical cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients (n = 137) with cervical cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy and three fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy were selected. CT images were acquired to delineate organs at risk and targets according to GEC-ESTRO recommendations. In order to determine the DA for the bladder and rectum, hybrid-based DIR was done for three different fractions of brachytherapy and the results were compared with the standard GEC-ESTRO method. Also, we performed a phantom study to calculate the uncertainty of the hybrid-based DIR algorithm for contour matching and dose mapping. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the Dice similarity coefficient (DICE), Jaccard, Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) in the DIR process were 0.94 ±0.02, 0.89 ±0.03, 8.44 ±3.56 and 0.72 ±0.22 for bladder and 0.89 ±0.05, 0.80 ±0.07, 15.46 ±10.14 and 1.19 ±0.59 for rectum, respectively. The median (Q1, Q3; maximum) Gy(EQD2) differences of total D(2cc) between DIR-based and SS methods for the bladder and rectum were reduced by –1.53 (–0.86, –2.98; –9.17) and –1.38 (–0.80, –2.14; –7.11), respectively. The mean ± SD of DICE, Jaccard, HD, and MDA for contour matching were 0.98 ±0.008, 0.97 ±0.01, 2.00 ±0.70 and 0.20 ±0.04, respectively for large deformation. Maximum uncertainty of dose mapping was about 3.58%. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid-based DIR algorithm demonstrated low registration uncertainty for both contour matching and dose mapping. The DA difference between DIR-based and SS approaches was statistically significant for both bladder and rectum and hybrid-based DIR showed potential to assess DA between brachytherapy fractions.