Cargando…

Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients with eyelid tumour treated with contact high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 2010 and August 2017, 10 consecutive patients with tumour of the eyelid underwent contact HDR-BT and custom-made surface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vavassori, Andrea, Riva, Giulia, Durante, Stefano, Fodor, Cristiana, Comi, Stefania, Cambria, Raffaella, Cattani, Federica, Spadola, Giuseppe, Orecchia, Roberto, Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749853
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88619
_version_ 1783470299783626752
author Vavassori, Andrea
Riva, Giulia
Durante, Stefano
Fodor, Cristiana
Comi, Stefania
Cambria, Raffaella
Cattani, Federica
Spadola, Giuseppe
Orecchia, Roberto
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
author_facet Vavassori, Andrea
Riva, Giulia
Durante, Stefano
Fodor, Cristiana
Comi, Stefania
Cambria, Raffaella
Cattani, Federica
Spadola, Giuseppe
Orecchia, Roberto
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
author_sort Vavassori, Andrea
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients with eyelid tumour treated with contact high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 2010 and August 2017, 10 consecutive patients with tumour of the eyelid underwent contact HDR-BT and custom-made surface mould. Every applicator was manually built using conventional thermoplastic material and standard plastic catheters. The median dose prescribed was 42 Gy (range, 30-48) with a median dose per fraction of 3.5 Gy (range, 2-4.5). The dose was delivered in a median of 12 fractions (range, 10-17) over a median of 16 days. In all cases, an ocular shield was placed to reduce the dose to the eye. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG toxicity criteria. RESULTS: We analyzed data of 9 of 10 patients (one patient was excluded because he did not give consent for investigation). The median age was 68 years (range, 31-88). According to the TNM-UICC staging system, 4, 1 and 4 patients were stage IA, IB and IC, respectively. Basal cell and sebaceous gland carcinomas were reported in 5 and 2 patients, respectively; other histological types were non-Hodgkin lymphoma and plasmacytoma. After a median follow-up of 51 months (range, 16-90), there was no evidence of local or distant recurrence. The treatment was very well tolerated. Most commonly acute reactions consisted of low grade (G1-G2) conjunctivitis and skin erythema. Only one patient required a temporary interruption of the treatment due to acute G2 conjunctivitis and G3 lid erythema. Only one G2 late toxicity was reported (corneal ulceration), without resulting in functional impairment or blindness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that contact HDR-BT with a customized applicator is safe, effective and offers very good local control and can be considered for the treatment of eyelid tumours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6854866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68548662019-11-20 Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma Vavassori, Andrea Riva, Giulia Durante, Stefano Fodor, Cristiana Comi, Stefania Cambria, Raffaella Cattani, Federica Spadola, Giuseppe Orecchia, Roberto Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients with eyelid tumour treated with contact high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 2010 and August 2017, 10 consecutive patients with tumour of the eyelid underwent contact HDR-BT and custom-made surface mould. Every applicator was manually built using conventional thermoplastic material and standard plastic catheters. The median dose prescribed was 42 Gy (range, 30-48) with a median dose per fraction of 3.5 Gy (range, 2-4.5). The dose was delivered in a median of 12 fractions (range, 10-17) over a median of 16 days. In all cases, an ocular shield was placed to reduce the dose to the eye. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG toxicity criteria. RESULTS: We analyzed data of 9 of 10 patients (one patient was excluded because he did not give consent for investigation). The median age was 68 years (range, 31-88). According to the TNM-UICC staging system, 4, 1 and 4 patients were stage IA, IB and IC, respectively. Basal cell and sebaceous gland carcinomas were reported in 5 and 2 patients, respectively; other histological types were non-Hodgkin lymphoma and plasmacytoma. After a median follow-up of 51 months (range, 16-90), there was no evidence of local or distant recurrence. The treatment was very well tolerated. Most commonly acute reactions consisted of low grade (G1-G2) conjunctivitis and skin erythema. Only one patient required a temporary interruption of the treatment due to acute G2 conjunctivitis and G3 lid erythema. Only one G2 late toxicity was reported (corneal ulceration), without resulting in functional impairment or blindness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that contact HDR-BT with a customized applicator is safe, effective and offers very good local control and can be considered for the treatment of eyelid tumours. Termedia Publishing House 2019-10-30 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6854866/ /pubmed/31749853 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88619 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Vavassori, Andrea
Riva, Giulia
Durante, Stefano
Fodor, Cristiana
Comi, Stefania
Cambria, Raffaella
Cattani, Federica
Spadola, Giuseppe
Orecchia, Roberto
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
title Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
title_full Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
title_fullStr Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
title_short Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
title_sort mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749853
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.88619
work_keys_str_mv AT vavassoriandrea mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT rivagiulia mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT durantestefano mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT fodorcristiana mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT comistefania mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT cambriaraffaella mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT cattanifederica mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT spadolagiuseppe mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT orecchiaroberto mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma
AT jereczekfossabarbaraalicja mouldbasedsurfacehighdoseratebrachytherapyforeyelidcarcinoma