Cargando…

Pulse wave velocity as a measure of arterial stiffness in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this meta-analysis was to establish whether vascular pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a measure of arterial stiffness is changed in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies comparing PWV between patients with FH and controls were searched i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reiner, Željko, Simental-Mendía, Luis E., Ruscica, Massimiliano, Katsiki, Niki, Banach, Maciej, Al Rasadi, Khalid, Jamialahmadi, Tannaz, Sahebkar, Amirhossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749863
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.89450
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this meta-analysis was to establish whether vascular pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a measure of arterial stiffness is changed in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies comparing PWV between patients with FH and controls were searched in PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases (up to November 26, 2017). A meta-analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2 software. A random-effects model (using the DerSimonian-Laird method) and the generic inverse variance method were used to compensate for the heterogeneity of studies concerning demographic characteristics and differences in the studies’ design. RESULTS: This meta-analysis of 8 studies involving 317 patients with FH and 244 non-FH individuals did not suggest a significantly altered PWV in FH patients versus controls (weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.17 m/s, 95% confidence interval (CI): –0.31, 0.65, p = 0.489; I(2) = 80.15%). The result was robust in the sensitivity analysis and its significance was not influenced after omitting each of the included studies from the meta-analysis. Subanalysis of 6 of these studies which had data on intima-media thickness (IMT) indicated an increased IMT in FH patients when compared with controls (WMD = 0.03 mm, 95% CI: 0.003, 0.06, p = 0.034; I(2) = 48.95%). However, the effect size was sensitive to some of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that FH patients do not have significantly altered PWV when compared with normocholesterolemic individuals. However, a subanalysis of studies in which IMT was measured indicated that IMT is increased in FH patients compared with controls.