Cargando…

Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?

INTRODUCTION: Liver biopsy is a well-known method for the diagnosis and evaluation of chronic diffuse liver diseases, especially among patients with “hepatopathy of unknown origin”. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the years 2014–2015 we performed 259 liver biopsies in 28 patients (22 females, 6 males, aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jabłońska, Joanna, Cielecka-Kuszyk, Joanna, Mikuła, Tomasz, Kozłowska, Joanna, Wiercińska-Drapało, Alicja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749874
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.82637
_version_ 1783470361799557120
author Jabłońska, Joanna
Cielecka-Kuszyk, Joanna
Mikuła, Tomasz
Kozłowska, Joanna
Wiercińska-Drapało, Alicja
author_facet Jabłońska, Joanna
Cielecka-Kuszyk, Joanna
Mikuła, Tomasz
Kozłowska, Joanna
Wiercińska-Drapało, Alicja
author_sort Jabłońska, Joanna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Liver biopsy is a well-known method for the diagnosis and evaluation of chronic diffuse liver diseases, especially among patients with “hepatopathy of unknown origin”. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the years 2014–2015 we performed 259 liver biopsies in 28 patients (22 females, 6 males, aged 18–65 years, mean: 45 years) with an initial diagnosis of “hepatopathy of unknown origin”. The liver biopsies of these 28 patients were revised by two independent pathologists. RESULTS: Histopathological features of autoimmune conditions were found in 11 cases, steatohepatitis with/without Mallory bodies in 7, simple steatosis without inflammation in 2 cases. In the other 8 cases the histopathological features were non-specific but pointed to vanishing bile duct syndrome, hemochromatosis, acute inflammation or fibrosis without inflammation. Surprisingly, only mild fibrosis without inflammatory infiltrates was present in one patient with a high titer of antinuclear antibodies (ANA > 1 : 3200). Mild cholestasis with bilirubinostasis was found in 4 cases. One patient had prominent lobular iron deposits and is now under observation for hemochromatosis. Vanishing bile duct syndrome as ductopenia without any signs of inflammation was found in one patient with suspicion of primary biliary cirrhosis. In one liver biopsy specimen we found normal liver architecture without inflammation or steatosis in a patient with elevated ALT and GGT, negative for viral antibodies and autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Liver biopsy – despite the increasing access to new, non-invasive methods – remains a useful method in the differential diagnosis of liver diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6855172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68551722019-11-20 Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis? Jabłońska, Joanna Cielecka-Kuszyk, Joanna Mikuła, Tomasz Kozłowska, Joanna Wiercińska-Drapało, Alicja Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Liver biopsy is a well-known method for the diagnosis and evaluation of chronic diffuse liver diseases, especially among patients with “hepatopathy of unknown origin”. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the years 2014–2015 we performed 259 liver biopsies in 28 patients (22 females, 6 males, aged 18–65 years, mean: 45 years) with an initial diagnosis of “hepatopathy of unknown origin”. The liver biopsies of these 28 patients were revised by two independent pathologists. RESULTS: Histopathological features of autoimmune conditions were found in 11 cases, steatohepatitis with/without Mallory bodies in 7, simple steatosis without inflammation in 2 cases. In the other 8 cases the histopathological features were non-specific but pointed to vanishing bile duct syndrome, hemochromatosis, acute inflammation or fibrosis without inflammation. Surprisingly, only mild fibrosis without inflammatory infiltrates was present in one patient with a high titer of antinuclear antibodies (ANA > 1 : 3200). Mild cholestasis with bilirubinostasis was found in 4 cases. One patient had prominent lobular iron deposits and is now under observation for hemochromatosis. Vanishing bile duct syndrome as ductopenia without any signs of inflammation was found in one patient with suspicion of primary biliary cirrhosis. In one liver biopsy specimen we found normal liver architecture without inflammation or steatosis in a patient with elevated ALT and GGT, negative for viral antibodies and autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Liver biopsy – despite the increasing access to new, non-invasive methods – remains a useful method in the differential diagnosis of liver diseases. Termedia Publishing House 2019-04-12 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6855172/ /pubmed/31749874 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.82637 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Jabłońska, Joanna
Cielecka-Kuszyk, Joanna
Mikuła, Tomasz
Kozłowska, Joanna
Wiercińska-Drapało, Alicja
Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
title Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
title_full Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
title_fullStr Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
title_full_unstemmed Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
title_short Hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
title_sort hepatopathy of unknown etiology – is liver biopsy a good tool in differential diagnosis?
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31749874
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.82637
work_keys_str_mv AT jabłonskajoanna hepatopathyofunknownetiologyisliverbiopsyagoodtoolindifferentialdiagnosis
AT cieleckakuszykjoanna hepatopathyofunknownetiologyisliverbiopsyagoodtoolindifferentialdiagnosis
AT mikułatomasz hepatopathyofunknownetiologyisliverbiopsyagoodtoolindifferentialdiagnosis
AT kozłowskajoanna hepatopathyofunknownetiologyisliverbiopsyagoodtoolindifferentialdiagnosis
AT wiercinskadrapałoalicja hepatopathyofunknownetiologyisliverbiopsyagoodtoolindifferentialdiagnosis