Cargando…

Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study

PURPOSE: We investigate the influence of positioning, gas fill, and anterior chamber size on bubble configuration and graft coverage after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: We use a mathematical model to study the bubble shape and graft coverage in eyes of varying an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pralits, Jan O., Alberti, Mark, Cabrerizo, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.6.9
_version_ 1783470384909123584
author Pralits, Jan O.
Alberti, Mark
Cabrerizo, Javier
author_facet Pralits, Jan O.
Alberti, Mark
Cabrerizo, Javier
author_sort Pralits, Jan O.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We investigate the influence of positioning, gas fill, and anterior chamber size on bubble configuration and graft coverage after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: We use a mathematical model to study the bubble shape and graft coverage in eyes of varying anterior chamber depths (ACD). The governing equations are solved numericly using the open source software OpenFOAM. Numeric results are validated clinically so that clinical gas fill measures can be correlated with numeric results providing gas-graft coverage information otherwise clinically inaccessible. RESULTS: In a phakic eye (ACD = 2.65 mm) with a gas fill of 35%, graft contact ranged from 35% to 38% depending on positioning and increased to 85% to 92% with a 70% fill. In contrast, positioning of a pseudophakic eye (ACD = 4.35) with a gas fill of 35% results in graft contact ranging from 8% to 52%, increasing to 63% to 94% with a 70% fill. The mathematical model demonstrates negligible differences between air and SF6 results and interestingly, a very thin central patch of aqueous humor within the gas bubble is found in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Graft coverage in phakic eyes (ACD ≤ 3 mm) is dominated by the gas fill and less sensitive to patient positioning. In pseudophakic eyes with larger values of ACD, the graft coverage depends on gas fill and patient positioning with positioning even more important as ACD increases. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Anterior chamber depth markedly influences the role of patient positioning in gas-filled eyes after DMEK due to the interplay between anterior chamber anatomy and gas bubble morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6855375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68553752019-11-15 Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study Pralits, Jan O. Alberti, Mark Cabrerizo, Javier Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: We investigate the influence of positioning, gas fill, and anterior chamber size on bubble configuration and graft coverage after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: We use a mathematical model to study the bubble shape and graft coverage in eyes of varying anterior chamber depths (ACD). The governing equations are solved numericly using the open source software OpenFOAM. Numeric results are validated clinically so that clinical gas fill measures can be correlated with numeric results providing gas-graft coverage information otherwise clinically inaccessible. RESULTS: In a phakic eye (ACD = 2.65 mm) with a gas fill of 35%, graft contact ranged from 35% to 38% depending on positioning and increased to 85% to 92% with a 70% fill. In contrast, positioning of a pseudophakic eye (ACD = 4.35) with a gas fill of 35% results in graft contact ranging from 8% to 52%, increasing to 63% to 94% with a 70% fill. The mathematical model demonstrates negligible differences between air and SF6 results and interestingly, a very thin central patch of aqueous humor within the gas bubble is found in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Graft coverage in phakic eyes (ACD ≤ 3 mm) is dominated by the gas fill and less sensitive to patient positioning. In pseudophakic eyes with larger values of ACD, the graft coverage depends on gas fill and patient positioning with positioning even more important as ACD increases. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Anterior chamber depth markedly influences the role of patient positioning in gas-filled eyes after DMEK due to the interplay between anterior chamber anatomy and gas bubble morphology. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6855375/ /pubmed/31737433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.6.9 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Pralits, Jan O.
Alberti, Mark
Cabrerizo, Javier
Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study
title Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study
title_full Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study
title_fullStr Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study
title_full_unstemmed Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study
title_short Gas-Graft Coverage After DMEK: A Clinically Validated Numeric Study
title_sort gas-graft coverage after dmek: a clinically validated numeric study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31737433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.6.9
work_keys_str_mv AT pralitsjano gasgraftcoverageafterdmekaclinicallyvalidatednumericstudy
AT albertimark gasgraftcoverageafterdmekaclinicallyvalidatednumericstudy
AT cabrerizojavier gasgraftcoverageafterdmekaclinicallyvalidatednumericstudy