Cargando…

Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey

PURPOSE: Neuroretinopathy is increasingly being recognized as an independent cause of vision loss in diabetes. Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Here, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bao, Yicheng K., Yan, Yan, Gordon, Mae, McGill, Janet B., Kass, Michael, Rajagopal, Rithwick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-28063
_version_ 1783470385839210496
author Bao, Yicheng K.
Yan, Yan
Gordon, Mae
McGill, Janet B.
Kass, Michael
Rajagopal, Rithwick
author_facet Bao, Yicheng K.
Yan, Yan
Gordon, Mae
McGill, Janet B.
Kass, Michael
Rajagopal, Rithwick
author_sort Bao, Yicheng K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Neuroretinopathy is increasingly being recognized as an independent cause of vision loss in diabetes. Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Here, we hypothesized that FDT visual field testing could identify patients with diabetic neuroretinopathy in the absence of clinically detectable microvascular DR. METHODS: All National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2008 participants receiving fundus photography and visual field screening by FDT were included in this study. Participants with self-reported glaucoma, use of glaucoma medications, or determination of glaucoma based on disk features were excluded. Visual fields were screened using FDT protocol in which participants underwent a 19-subfield suprathreshold test. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes but no DR were more likely to have ≥1 subfield defects at 5%, 2%, and 1% probability levels than patients without diabetes (41.3% vs. 28.6%; 27.4% vs. 17.5%; 15.9% vs. 9.4%; all P < 0.0008). Multivariable regression showed that each additional glycated hemoglobin % (HbA1c) was associated with 19% greater odds of having ≥1 visual subfield defects in those with diabetes without DR (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.33; P = 0.0020). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes have visual field defects in the absence of clinically detectable DR, suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classical microvascular disease. These defects become more frequent with the onset of visible retinopathy and worsen as the retinopathy becomes more severe. Longitudinal studies are required to understand the pathogenesis of diabetic neuroretinopathy in relation to classic DR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6855391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68553912019-11-23 Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey Bao, Yicheng K. Yan, Yan Gordon, Mae McGill, Janet B. Kass, Michael Rajagopal, Rithwick Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Clinical and Epidemiologic Research PURPOSE: Neuroretinopathy is increasingly being recognized as an independent cause of vision loss in diabetes. Visual field loss, as detected by frequency doubling technology (FDT)-based visual perimetry, is a sign of neuroretinopathy and occurs in early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Here, we hypothesized that FDT visual field testing could identify patients with diabetic neuroretinopathy in the absence of clinically detectable microvascular DR. METHODS: All National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2008 participants receiving fundus photography and visual field screening by FDT were included in this study. Participants with self-reported glaucoma, use of glaucoma medications, or determination of glaucoma based on disk features were excluded. Visual fields were screened using FDT protocol in which participants underwent a 19-subfield suprathreshold test. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes but no DR were more likely to have ≥1 subfield defects at 5%, 2%, and 1% probability levels than patients without diabetes (41.3% vs. 28.6%; 27.4% vs. 17.5%; 15.9% vs. 9.4%; all P < 0.0008). Multivariable regression showed that each additional glycated hemoglobin % (HbA1c) was associated with 19% greater odds of having ≥1 visual subfield defects in those with diabetes without DR (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.33; P = 0.0020). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes have visual field defects in the absence of clinically detectable DR, suggesting neuroretinopathy precedes classical microvascular disease. These defects become more frequent with the onset of visible retinopathy and worsen as the retinopathy becomes more severe. Longitudinal studies are required to understand the pathogenesis of diabetic neuroretinopathy in relation to classic DR. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6855391/ /pubmed/31725170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-28063 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiologic Research
Bao, Yicheng K.
Yan, Yan
Gordon, Mae
McGill, Janet B.
Kass, Michael
Rajagopal, Rithwick
Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey
title Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey
title_full Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey
title_fullStr Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey
title_full_unstemmed Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey
title_short Visual Field Loss in Patients With Diabetes in the Absence of Clinically-Detectable Vascular Retinopathy in a Nationally Representative Survey
title_sort visual field loss in patients with diabetes in the absence of clinically-detectable vascular retinopathy in a nationally representative survey
topic Clinical and Epidemiologic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-28063
work_keys_str_mv AT baoyichengk visualfieldlossinpatientswithdiabetesintheabsenceofclinicallydetectablevascularretinopathyinanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT yanyan visualfieldlossinpatientswithdiabetesintheabsenceofclinicallydetectablevascularretinopathyinanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT gordonmae visualfieldlossinpatientswithdiabetesintheabsenceofclinicallydetectablevascularretinopathyinanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT mcgilljanetb visualfieldlossinpatientswithdiabetesintheabsenceofclinicallydetectablevascularretinopathyinanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT kassmichael visualfieldlossinpatientswithdiabetesintheabsenceofclinicallydetectablevascularretinopathyinanationallyrepresentativesurvey
AT rajagopalrithwick visualfieldlossinpatientswithdiabetesintheabsenceofclinicallydetectablevascularretinopathyinanationallyrepresentativesurvey