Cargando…

Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The recommended chest compression technique for a single rescuer performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation is the two-finger technique. For 2 rescuers, a two-thumb-encircling hands technique is recommended. Several recent studies have reported that the two-thumb-encircling hands te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ji Eun, Lee, Juncheol, Oh, Jaehoon, Park, Chan Hyuk, Kang, Hyunggoo, Lim, Tae Ho, Yoo, Kyung Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017853
_version_ 1783470442737041408
author Lee, Ji Eun
Lee, Juncheol
Oh, Jaehoon
Park, Chan Hyuk
Kang, Hyunggoo
Lim, Tae Ho
Yoo, Kyung Hun
author_facet Lee, Ji Eun
Lee, Juncheol
Oh, Jaehoon
Park, Chan Hyuk
Kang, Hyunggoo
Lim, Tae Ho
Yoo, Kyung Hun
author_sort Lee, Ji Eun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recommended chest compression technique for a single rescuer performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation is the two-finger technique. For 2 rescuers, a two-thumb-encircling hands technique is recommended. Several recent studies have reported that the two-thumb-encircling hands technique is more effective for high-quality chest compression than the two-finger technique for a single rescuer performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of infant manikin studies to compare two-thumb-encircling hands technique with two-finger technique for a single rescuer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials published prior to December 2017, including cross-over design studies. The primary outcome was the mean difference in chest compression depth (mm). The secondary outcome was the mean difference in chest compression rate (counts/min). A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). RESULTS: Six studies that had reported data concerning both chest compression depth and chest compression rate were included. The two-thumb-encircling hands technique was associated with deeper chest compressions compared with two-finger technique for mean chest compression depth (mean difference, 5.50 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–10.69 mm; P = .04), but no significant difference in the mean chest compression rate (mean difference, 7.89 counts/min; 95% confidence interval, to 0.99, 16.77 counts/min; P = .08) was noted. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the two-thumb-encircling hands technique is a more appropriate technique for a single rescuer to perform high-quality chest compression in consideration of chest compression depth than the two-finger technique in infant manikin studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6855637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68556372019-11-26 Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Ji Eun Lee, Juncheol Oh, Jaehoon Park, Chan Hyuk Kang, Hyunggoo Lim, Tae Ho Yoo, Kyung Hun Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 BACKGROUND: The recommended chest compression technique for a single rescuer performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation is the two-finger technique. For 2 rescuers, a two-thumb-encircling hands technique is recommended. Several recent studies have reported that the two-thumb-encircling hands technique is more effective for high-quality chest compression than the two-finger technique for a single rescuer performing infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of infant manikin studies to compare two-thumb-encircling hands technique with two-finger technique for a single rescuer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials published prior to December 2017, including cross-over design studies. The primary outcome was the mean difference in chest compression depth (mm). The secondary outcome was the mean difference in chest compression rate (counts/min). A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). RESULTS: Six studies that had reported data concerning both chest compression depth and chest compression rate were included. The two-thumb-encircling hands technique was associated with deeper chest compressions compared with two-finger technique for mean chest compression depth (mean difference, 5.50 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–10.69 mm; P = .04), but no significant difference in the mean chest compression rate (mean difference, 7.89 counts/min; 95% confidence interval, to 0.99, 16.77 counts/min; P = .08) was noted. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the two-thumb-encircling hands technique is a more appropriate technique for a single rescuer to perform high-quality chest compression in consideration of chest compression depth than the two-finger technique in infant manikin studies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6855637/ /pubmed/31702646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017853 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3900
Lee, Ji Eun
Lee, Juncheol
Oh, Jaehoon
Park, Chan Hyuk
Kang, Hyunggoo
Lim, Tae Ho
Yoo, Kyung Hun
Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of two-thumb encircling and two-finger technique during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation with single rescuer in simulation studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017853
work_keys_str_mv AT leejieun comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leejuncheol comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ohjaehoon comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parkchanhyuk comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kanghyunggoo comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limtaeho comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yookyunghun comparisonoftwothumbencirclingandtwofingertechniqueduringinfantcardiopulmonaryresuscitationwithsinglerescuerinsimulationstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis