Cargando…
Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus’
Controversial cases in medical ethics are, by their very nature, divisive. There are disagreements that revolve around questions of fact or of value. Ethical debate may help in resolving those disagreements. However, sometimes in such cases, there are opposing reasonable views arising from deep-seat...
Autores principales: | Wilkinson, Dominic, Savulescu, Julian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105622 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Rationally irresolvable disagreement
por: Melchior, Guido
Publicado: (2023) -
Is withdrawing treatment really more problematic than withholding treatment?
por: Cameron, James, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
por: Savulescu, Julian
Publicado: (2021) -
Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
por: Savulescu, Julian, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End‐of‐Life Decisions
por: Wilkinson, Dominic, et al.
Publicado: (2015)