Cargando…

Neonatal outcomes in preterm multiples receiving delayed cord clamping

OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal outcomes in singletons versus multiples, first-born versus second-born multiples and monochorionic versus dichorionic/trichorionic multiples <33 weeks’ gestational age (GA) who received delayed cord clamping (DCC). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study of 529 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jegatheesan, Priya, Belogolovsky, Esther, Nudelman, Matthew, Song, Dongli, Govindaswami, Balaji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6855790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316479
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal outcomes in singletons versus multiples, first-born versus second-born multiples and monochorionic versus dichorionic/trichorionic multiples <33 weeks’ gestational age (GA) who received delayed cord clamping (DCC). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study of 529 preterm infants receiving ≥30 s DCC. Generalised estimating equations and mixed effects models were used to compare outcomes in singletons versus multiples and monochorionic versus dichorionic/trichorionic multiples. Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests were used to compare first-born versus second-born multiples. SETTING: Level III neonatal intensive care unit, California, USA. PATIENTS: 433 singletons and 96 multiples <33 weeks’ GA, born January 2008–December 2017, who received DCC. RESULTS: 86% of multiples and 83% of singletons received DCC. Multiples had higher GA (31.0 weeks vs 30.6 weeks), more caesarean sections (91% vs 54%), fewer males (48% vs 62%) and higher 12–24 hour haematocrits (54.3 vs 50.5) than singletons. Haematocrit difference remained significant after adjusting for birth weight, delivery type and sex. Compared with first-born multiples, second-born multiples were smaller (1550 g vs 1438 g) and had lower survival without major morbidity (91% vs 77%). Survival without major morbidity was not significant after adjusting for birth weight. Compared with dichorionic/trichorionic multiples, monochorionic multiples had slightly lower admission temperatures (37.0°C vs 36.8°C), although this difference was not clinically significant. There were no other differences in delivery room, respiratory, haematological or neonatal outcomes between singletons and multiples or between multiples’ subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcomes in preterm infants receiving DCC were comparable between singletons and multiples, first and second order multiples and monochorionic and dichorionic/trichorionic multiples.