Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5 |
_version_ | 1783470489114509312 |
---|---|
author | Lorenzoni, Valentina Bellelli, Stefania Caselli, Chiara Knuuti, Juhani Underwood, Stephen Richard Neglia, Danilo Turchetti, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Lorenzoni, Valentina Bellelli, Stefania Caselli, Chiara Knuuti, Juhani Underwood, Stephen Richard Neglia, Danilo Turchetti, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Lorenzoni, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 350 patients (209 males, mean age 59 ± 9 years) with symptoms of suspected stable CAD undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and at least one cardiac imaging stress-test prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and in whom imaging exams were analysed at dedicated core laboratories. Stand-alone stress-tests or combined non-invasive strategies, when the first exam was uncertain, were compared. The diagnostic end-point was obstructive CAD defined as > 50% stenosis at quantitative ICA in the left main or at least one major coronary vessel. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of correct diagnosis (cd) and costs were calculated using country-specific reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were obtained using per-patient data and considering “no-imaging” as reference. The overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 28%. Strategies combining CTCA followed by stress ECHO, SPECT, PET, or stress CMR followed by CTCA, were all cost-effective. ICERs values indicated cost saving from − 969€/cd for CMR-CTCA to − 1490€/cd for CTCA-PET, − 3092€/cd for CTCA-SPECT and − 3776€/cd for CTCA-ECHO. Similarly when considering early revascularization as effectiveness measure. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected stable CAD and low prevalence of disease, combined non-invasive strategies with CTCA and stress-imaging are cost-effective as gatekeepers to ICA and to select candidates for early revascularization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6856023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68560232019-12-03 Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study Lorenzoni, Valentina Bellelli, Stefania Caselli, Chiara Knuuti, Juhani Underwood, Stephen Richard Neglia, Danilo Turchetti, Giuseppe Eur J Health Econ Original Paper AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 350 patients (209 males, mean age 59 ± 9 years) with symptoms of suspected stable CAD undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and at least one cardiac imaging stress-test prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and in whom imaging exams were analysed at dedicated core laboratories. Stand-alone stress-tests or combined non-invasive strategies, when the first exam was uncertain, were compared. The diagnostic end-point was obstructive CAD defined as > 50% stenosis at quantitative ICA in the left main or at least one major coronary vessel. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of correct diagnosis (cd) and costs were calculated using country-specific reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were obtained using per-patient data and considering “no-imaging” as reference. The overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 28%. Strategies combining CTCA followed by stress ECHO, SPECT, PET, or stress CMR followed by CTCA, were all cost-effective. ICERs values indicated cost saving from − 969€/cd for CMR-CTCA to − 1490€/cd for CTCA-PET, − 3092€/cd for CTCA-SPECT and − 3776€/cd for CTCA-ECHO. Similarly when considering early revascularization as effectiveness measure. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected stable CAD and low prevalence of disease, combined non-invasive strategies with CTCA and stress-imaging are cost-effective as gatekeepers to ICA and to select candidates for early revascularization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6856023/ /pubmed/31410670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lorenzoni, Valentina Bellelli, Stefania Caselli, Chiara Knuuti, Juhani Underwood, Stephen Richard Neglia, Danilo Turchetti, Giuseppe Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the evinci study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenzonivalentina costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT bellellistefania costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT casellichiara costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT knuutijuhani costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT underwoodstephenrichard costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT negliadanilo costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT turchettigiuseppe costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy AT costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy |