Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study

AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenzoni, Valentina, Bellelli, Stefania, Caselli, Chiara, Knuuti, Juhani, Underwood, Stephen Richard, Neglia, Danilo, Turchetti, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5
_version_ 1783470489114509312
author Lorenzoni, Valentina
Bellelli, Stefania
Caselli, Chiara
Knuuti, Juhani
Underwood, Stephen Richard
Neglia, Danilo
Turchetti, Giuseppe
author_facet Lorenzoni, Valentina
Bellelli, Stefania
Caselli, Chiara
Knuuti, Juhani
Underwood, Stephen Richard
Neglia, Danilo
Turchetti, Giuseppe
author_sort Lorenzoni, Valentina
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 350 patients (209 males, mean age 59 ± 9 years) with symptoms of suspected stable CAD undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and at least one cardiac imaging stress-test prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and in whom imaging exams were analysed at dedicated core laboratories. Stand-alone stress-tests or combined non-invasive strategies, when the first exam was uncertain, were compared. The diagnostic end-point was obstructive CAD defined as > 50% stenosis at quantitative ICA in the left main or at least one major coronary vessel. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of correct diagnosis (cd) and costs were calculated using country-specific reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were obtained using per-patient data and considering “no-imaging” as reference. The overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 28%. Strategies combining CTCA followed by stress ECHO, SPECT, PET, or stress CMR followed by CTCA, were all cost-effective. ICERs values indicated cost saving from − 969€/cd for CMR-CTCA to − 1490€/cd for CTCA-PET, − 3092€/cd for CTCA-SPECT and − 3776€/cd for CTCA-ECHO. Similarly when considering early revascularization as effectiveness measure. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected stable CAD and low prevalence of disease, combined non-invasive strategies with CTCA and stress-imaging are cost-effective as gatekeepers to ICA and to select candidates for early revascularization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6856023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68560232019-12-03 Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study Lorenzoni, Valentina Bellelli, Stefania Caselli, Chiara Knuuti, Juhani Underwood, Stephen Richard Neglia, Danilo Turchetti, Giuseppe Eur J Health Econ Original Paper AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 350 patients (209 males, mean age 59 ± 9 years) with symptoms of suspected stable CAD undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and at least one cardiac imaging stress-test prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and in whom imaging exams were analysed at dedicated core laboratories. Stand-alone stress-tests or combined non-invasive strategies, when the first exam was uncertain, were compared. The diagnostic end-point was obstructive CAD defined as > 50% stenosis at quantitative ICA in the left main or at least one major coronary vessel. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of correct diagnosis (cd) and costs were calculated using country-specific reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were obtained using per-patient data and considering “no-imaging” as reference. The overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 28%. Strategies combining CTCA followed by stress ECHO, SPECT, PET, or stress CMR followed by CTCA, were all cost-effective. ICERs values indicated cost saving from − 969€/cd for CMR-CTCA to − 1490€/cd for CTCA-PET, − 3092€/cd for CTCA-SPECT and − 3776€/cd for CTCA-ECHO. Similarly when considering early revascularization as effectiveness measure. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected stable CAD and low prevalence of disease, combined non-invasive strategies with CTCA and stress-imaging are cost-effective as gatekeepers to ICA and to select candidates for early revascularization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6856023/ /pubmed/31410670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lorenzoni, Valentina
Bellelli, Stefania
Caselli, Chiara
Knuuti, Juhani
Underwood, Stephen Richard
Neglia, Danilo
Turchetti, Giuseppe
Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the evinci study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzonivalentina costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT bellellistefania costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT casellichiara costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT knuutijuhani costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT underwoodstephenrichard costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT negliadanilo costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT turchettigiuseppe costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy
AT costeffectivenessanalysisofstandaloneorcombinednoninvasiveimagingtestsforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydiseaseresultsfromtheevincistudy