Cargando…
Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population
Trends in population abundance can be challenging to quantify during range expansion and contraction, when there is spatial variation in trend, or the conservation area is large. We used genetic detection data from natural bear rubbing sites and spatial capture-recapture (SCR) modeling to estimate l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52783-5 |
_version_ | 1783470508619071488 |
---|---|
author | Kendall, Katherine C. Graves, Tabitha A. Royle, J. Andrew Macleod, Amy C. McKelvey, Kevin S. Boulanger, John Waller, John S. |
author_facet | Kendall, Katherine C. Graves, Tabitha A. Royle, J. Andrew Macleod, Amy C. McKelvey, Kevin S. Boulanger, John Waller, John S. |
author_sort | Kendall, Katherine C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Trends in population abundance can be challenging to quantify during range expansion and contraction, when there is spatial variation in trend, or the conservation area is large. We used genetic detection data from natural bear rubbing sites and spatial capture-recapture (SCR) modeling to estimate local density and population growth rates in a grizzly bear population in northwestern Montana, USA. We visited bear rubs to collect hair in 2004, 2009—2012 (3,579—4,802 rubs) and detected 249—355 individual bears each year. We estimated the finite annual population rate of change 2004—2012 was 1.043 (95% CI = 1.017—1.069). Population density shifted from being concentrated in the north in 2004 to a more even distribution across the ecosystem by 2012. Our genetic detection sampling approach coupled with SCR modeling allowed us to estimate spatially variable growth rates of an expanding grizzly bear population and provided insight into how those patterns developed. The ability of SCR to utilize unstructured data and produce spatially explicit maps that indicate where population change is occurring promises to facilitate the monitoring of difficult-to-study species across large spatial areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6856102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68561022019-11-19 Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population Kendall, Katherine C. Graves, Tabitha A. Royle, J. Andrew Macleod, Amy C. McKelvey, Kevin S. Boulanger, John Waller, John S. Sci Rep Article Trends in population abundance can be challenging to quantify during range expansion and contraction, when there is spatial variation in trend, or the conservation area is large. We used genetic detection data from natural bear rubbing sites and spatial capture-recapture (SCR) modeling to estimate local density and population growth rates in a grizzly bear population in northwestern Montana, USA. We visited bear rubs to collect hair in 2004, 2009—2012 (3,579—4,802 rubs) and detected 249—355 individual bears each year. We estimated the finite annual population rate of change 2004—2012 was 1.043 (95% CI = 1.017—1.069). Population density shifted from being concentrated in the north in 2004 to a more even distribution across the ecosystem by 2012. Our genetic detection sampling approach coupled with SCR modeling allowed us to estimate spatially variable growth rates of an expanding grizzly bear population and provided insight into how those patterns developed. The ability of SCR to utilize unstructured data and produce spatially explicit maps that indicate where population change is occurring promises to facilitate the monitoring of difficult-to-study species across large spatial areas. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6856102/ /pubmed/31727927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52783-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kendall, Katherine C. Graves, Tabitha A. Royle, J. Andrew Macleod, Amy C. McKelvey, Kevin S. Boulanger, John Waller, John S. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
title | Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
title_full | Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
title_fullStr | Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
title_full_unstemmed | Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
title_short | Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
title_sort | using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52783-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kendallkatherinec usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation AT gravestabithaa usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation AT roylejandrew usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation AT macleodamyc usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation AT mckelveykevins usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation AT boulangerjohn usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation AT wallerjohns usingbearrubdataandspatialcapturerecapturemodelstoestimatetrendinabrownbearpopulation |