Cargando…

Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Purpose: Varian Halcyon is a novel machine with dual-layer leaves, single flattening filter free (FFF) energy and an enclosed bore. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in dosimetry and plan parameters of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans between the Halcyon and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chengqiang, Chen, Jinhu, Zhu, Jian, Gong, Guanzhong, Tao, Cheng, Li, Zhenjiang, Lu, Jie, Yin, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762823
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32500
_version_ 1783470597613813760
author Li, Chengqiang
Chen, Jinhu
Zhu, Jian
Gong, Guanzhong
Tao, Cheng
Li, Zhenjiang
Lu, Jie
Yin, Yong
author_facet Li, Chengqiang
Chen, Jinhu
Zhu, Jian
Gong, Guanzhong
Tao, Cheng
Li, Zhenjiang
Lu, Jie
Yin, Yong
author_sort Li, Chengqiang
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Varian Halcyon is a novel machine with dual-layer leaves, single flattening filter free (FFF) energy and an enclosed bore. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in dosimetry and plan parameters of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans between the Halcyon and Trilogy accelerators. Methods and Materials: A total of 30 IMRT plans from cervical carcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed on the Trilogy and Eclipse v13.5 treatment planning systems (TPSs). For each patient, a new plan based on Halcyon was created with the same planning parameters and optimization constraints using the Eclipse Version 15.1 TPS. To compare plan qualities, dosimetry parameters regarding planning target volume (PTV), organs at risk (OARs), monitor unit (MU) efficiency, segment size and treatment time were evaluated. Evaluation of the helical diode array system was performed with gamma-index analysis. Results: The dose distribution of the target volume of the Halcyon and Trilogy plans showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The mean doses of rectum and both femoral heads for Halcyon plans were significantly reduced compared to those for Trilogy plans (p < 0.05). Compared to Trilogy, Halcyon increased the number of MUs from 1542.9±248.3 MU to 2514.9±328.2 MU (p = 0.00) and decreased the delivery time from 11.28±1.36 min to 3.26±0.26 min (p = 0.00). The average segment areas of Halcyon plans for proximal and distal multileaf collimators (MLCs) were 42.1 ± 31.2 cm(2) and 28.4 ± 23.7 cm(2), respectively, and that of Trilogy plans was 27.3 ± 16.9 cm(2). The mean gamma index (3 mm/3%) results for the Halcyon and Trilogy plans were 99.41±0.26 and 99.76±0.32 (p > 0.05), respectively. Conclusions: All Halcyon treatment plans were recognized as clinically acceptable and had statistically better OAR sparing with higher delivery efficiency. The Halcyon system exhibited fast treatment delivery of IMRT with good dosimetric agreement using ArcCHECK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6856582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68565822019-11-24 Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy Li, Chengqiang Chen, Jinhu Zhu, Jian Gong, Guanzhong Tao, Cheng Li, Zhenjiang Lu, Jie Yin, Yong J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: Varian Halcyon is a novel machine with dual-layer leaves, single flattening filter free (FFF) energy and an enclosed bore. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in dosimetry and plan parameters of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans between the Halcyon and Trilogy accelerators. Methods and Materials: A total of 30 IMRT plans from cervical carcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed on the Trilogy and Eclipse v13.5 treatment planning systems (TPSs). For each patient, a new plan based on Halcyon was created with the same planning parameters and optimization constraints using the Eclipse Version 15.1 TPS. To compare plan qualities, dosimetry parameters regarding planning target volume (PTV), organs at risk (OARs), monitor unit (MU) efficiency, segment size and treatment time were evaluated. Evaluation of the helical diode array system was performed with gamma-index analysis. Results: The dose distribution of the target volume of the Halcyon and Trilogy plans showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The mean doses of rectum and both femoral heads for Halcyon plans were significantly reduced compared to those for Trilogy plans (p < 0.05). Compared to Trilogy, Halcyon increased the number of MUs from 1542.9±248.3 MU to 2514.9±328.2 MU (p = 0.00) and decreased the delivery time from 11.28±1.36 min to 3.26±0.26 min (p = 0.00). The average segment areas of Halcyon plans for proximal and distal multileaf collimators (MLCs) were 42.1 ± 31.2 cm(2) and 28.4 ± 23.7 cm(2), respectively, and that of Trilogy plans was 27.3 ± 16.9 cm(2). The mean gamma index (3 mm/3%) results for the Halcyon and Trilogy plans were 99.41±0.26 and 99.76±0.32 (p > 0.05), respectively. Conclusions: All Halcyon treatment plans were recognized as clinically acceptable and had statistically better OAR sparing with higher delivery efficiency. The Halcyon system exhibited fast treatment delivery of IMRT with good dosimetric agreement using ArcCHECK. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6856582/ /pubmed/31762823 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32500 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Li, Chengqiang
Chen, Jinhu
Zhu, Jian
Gong, Guanzhong
Tao, Cheng
Li, Zhenjiang
Lu, Jie
Yin, Yong
Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_short Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_sort plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with halcyon and trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762823
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32500
work_keys_str_mv AT lichengqiang planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT chenjinhu planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT zhujian planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT gongguanzhong planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT taocheng planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT lizhenjiang planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT lujie planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT yinyong planqualitycomparisonforcervicalcarcinomatreatedwithhalcyonandtrilogyintensitymodulatedradiotherapy