Cargando…
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777588 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32685 |
_version_ | 1783470666047029248 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Linzhen Wang, Liuhong Tan, Yinuo Hu, Hanguang Shen, Li Zheng, Shu Ding, Kefeng Zhang, Suzhan Yuan, Ying |
author_facet | Yu, Linzhen Wang, Liuhong Tan, Yinuo Hu, Hanguang Shen, Li Zheng, Shu Ding, Kefeng Zhang, Suzhan Yuan, Ying |
author_sort | Yu, Linzhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April 2018, in which 137 patients (36 received MDT discussion) received neoadjuvant therapy, 240 did not (97 received MDT discussion) and direct surgery was given. With postoperative pathological stage as the standard, the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging for rectal cancer with MDT discussion was compared with non-MDT. Results: For direct surgery group, 21 out 97 (21.6%) patients changed their therapy strategy due to the change of the stage assessment after MDT. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of preoperative N stage with MDT was significantly higher than those without MDT (56.2% vs. 42.1%, P=0.021). And for those without lymph node metastasis, the accuracy of MRI was higher after MDT (61.2% vs. 37.8%, P=0.009). For neoadjuvant therapy group, 7 out of 36 (19.4%) patients altered their therapy after MDT because of the changed stage. MDT improved the accuracy of restaging N stage with MRI (70.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.003). The accuracy of MRI in staging T stage seemed not improved after MDT in both groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT discussion increased the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer. This mode could give a more accurate clinical stage of patients, which was in favor of choosing a preferable therapy strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6856893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68568932019-11-27 Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience Yu, Linzhen Wang, Liuhong Tan, Yinuo Hu, Hanguang Shen, Li Zheng, Shu Ding, Kefeng Zhang, Suzhan Yuan, Ying J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April 2018, in which 137 patients (36 received MDT discussion) received neoadjuvant therapy, 240 did not (97 received MDT discussion) and direct surgery was given. With postoperative pathological stage as the standard, the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging for rectal cancer with MDT discussion was compared with non-MDT. Results: For direct surgery group, 21 out 97 (21.6%) patients changed their therapy strategy due to the change of the stage assessment after MDT. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of preoperative N stage with MDT was significantly higher than those without MDT (56.2% vs. 42.1%, P=0.021). And for those without lymph node metastasis, the accuracy of MRI was higher after MDT (61.2% vs. 37.8%, P=0.009). For neoadjuvant therapy group, 7 out of 36 (19.4%) patients altered their therapy after MDT because of the changed stage. MDT improved the accuracy of restaging N stage with MRI (70.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.003). The accuracy of MRI in staging T stage seemed not improved after MDT in both groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT discussion increased the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer. This mode could give a more accurate clinical stage of patients, which was in favor of choosing a preferable therapy strategy. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6856893/ /pubmed/31777588 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32685 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Yu, Linzhen Wang, Liuhong Tan, Yinuo Hu, Hanguang Shen, Li Zheng, Shu Ding, Kefeng Zhang, Suzhan Yuan, Ying Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience |
title | Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team: a single-center experience |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777588 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yulinzhen accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT wangliuhong accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT tanyinuo accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT huhanguang accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT shenli accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT zhengshu accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT dingkefeng accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT zhangsuzhan accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience AT yuanying accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience |