Cargando…

Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Linzhen, Wang, Liuhong, Tan, Yinuo, Hu, Hanguang, Shen, Li, Zheng, Shu, Ding, Kefeng, Zhang, Suzhan, Yuan, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777588
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32685
_version_ 1783470666047029248
author Yu, Linzhen
Wang, Liuhong
Tan, Yinuo
Hu, Hanguang
Shen, Li
Zheng, Shu
Ding, Kefeng
Zhang, Suzhan
Yuan, Ying
author_facet Yu, Linzhen
Wang, Liuhong
Tan, Yinuo
Hu, Hanguang
Shen, Li
Zheng, Shu
Ding, Kefeng
Zhang, Suzhan
Yuan, Ying
author_sort Yu, Linzhen
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April 2018, in which 137 patients (36 received MDT discussion) received neoadjuvant therapy, 240 did not (97 received MDT discussion) and direct surgery was given. With postoperative pathological stage as the standard, the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging for rectal cancer with MDT discussion was compared with non-MDT. Results: For direct surgery group, 21 out 97 (21.6%) patients changed their therapy strategy due to the change of the stage assessment after MDT. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of preoperative N stage with MDT was significantly higher than those without MDT (56.2% vs. 42.1%, P=0.021). And for those without lymph node metastasis, the accuracy of MRI was higher after MDT (61.2% vs. 37.8%, P=0.009). For neoadjuvant therapy group, 7 out of 36 (19.4%) patients altered their therapy after MDT because of the changed stage. MDT improved the accuracy of restaging N stage with MRI (70.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.003). The accuracy of MRI in staging T stage seemed not improved after MDT in both groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT discussion increased the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer. This mode could give a more accurate clinical stage of patients, which was in favor of choosing a preferable therapy strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6856893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68568932019-11-27 Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience Yu, Linzhen Wang, Liuhong Tan, Yinuo Hu, Hanguang Shen, Li Zheng, Shu Ding, Kefeng Zhang, Suzhan Yuan, Ying J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. Methods: The retrospective study included 377 patients of rectal cancer with preoperative MRI staging from February 2015 to April 2018, in which 137 patients (36 received MDT discussion) received neoadjuvant therapy, 240 did not (97 received MDT discussion) and direct surgery was given. With postoperative pathological stage as the standard, the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging for rectal cancer with MDT discussion was compared with non-MDT. Results: For direct surgery group, 21 out 97 (21.6%) patients changed their therapy strategy due to the change of the stage assessment after MDT. The accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of preoperative N stage with MDT was significantly higher than those without MDT (56.2% vs. 42.1%, P=0.021). And for those without lymph node metastasis, the accuracy of MRI was higher after MDT (61.2% vs. 37.8%, P=0.009). For neoadjuvant therapy group, 7 out of 36 (19.4%) patients altered their therapy after MDT because of the changed stage. MDT improved the accuracy of restaging N stage with MRI (70.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.003). The accuracy of MRI in staging T stage seemed not improved after MDT in both groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDT discussion increased the accuracy of MRI in preoperative staging diagnosis for rectal cancer. This mode could give a more accurate clinical stage of patients, which was in favor of choosing a preferable therapy strategy. Ivyspring International Publisher 2019-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6856893/ /pubmed/31777588 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32685 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Yu, Linzhen
Wang, Liuhong
Tan, Yinuo
Hu, Hanguang
Shen, Li
Zheng, Shu
Ding, Kefeng
Zhang, Suzhan
Yuan, Ying
Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
title Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging Rectal Cancer with Multidisciplinary Team: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal cancer with multidisciplinary team: a single-center experience
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777588
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.32685
work_keys_str_mv AT yulinzhen accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT wangliuhong accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT tanyinuo accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT huhanguang accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT shenli accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT zhengshu accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT dingkefeng accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT zhangsuzhan accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience
AT yuanying accuracyofmagneticresonanceimaginginstagingrectalcancerwithmultidisciplinaryteamasinglecenterexperience