Cargando…
How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper)
BACKGROUND: In the last years, there has been an increase in publication of systematic reviews of normative (“argument-based”) literature or of normative information (such as ethical issues) in bioethics. The aim of a systematic review is to search, select, analyse and synthesise literature in a tra...
Autor principal: | Mertz, Marcel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0423-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The conundrums of the reasonable patient standard in English medical law
por: Kwok, Kelvin Hiu Fai, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The prediabetes conundrum: striking the balance between risk and resources
por: Blond, Martin B., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice
por: Salloch, Sabine, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
From international health to global health: how to foster a better dialogue between empirical and normative disciplines
por: Ooms, Gorik
Publicado: (2014) -
HIV prevention, structural change and social values: the need for an explicit normative approach
por: Parkhurst, Justin O
Publicado: (2012)