Cargando…

The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study

BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic bone has been widely used in a variety of clinical bone-related disease to promote bone healing and restore bone defects. However, the adverse effects of immune system limit its application in the clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate xenogeneic bone safety of immunoto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xiaoxia, Liu, Chenghu, Shi, Yanping, Li, Chunling, Sun, Likui, Hou, Li, Wang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0729-z
_version_ 1783470738239389696
author Sun, Xiaoxia
Liu, Chenghu
Shi, Yanping
Li, Chunling
Sun, Likui
Hou, Li
Wang, Xin
author_facet Sun, Xiaoxia
Liu, Chenghu
Shi, Yanping
Li, Chunling
Sun, Likui
Hou, Li
Wang, Xin
author_sort Sun, Xiaoxia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic bone has been widely used in a variety of clinical bone-related disease to promote bone healing and restore bone defects. However, the adverse effects of immune system limit its application in the clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate xenogeneic bone safety of immunotoxicity and explore the methods for immune risk supervision. RESULTS: Xenogeneic bone, which is freeze-dried bovine cancellous bone, was implanted into the muscle of mice. On day 7, 14 and 28, the effects of xenogeneic bone were examined on humoral immunity and cellular immunity, including the levels of IgG, IgM, C3, inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the lymphocyte phenotype. The data showed that xenogeneic bone implantation had no potential to induce immune responses not only in humoral immunity but also in cellular immunity. To reveal the risk of immunogenicity, the residual DNA and the clearance of α-gal epitope were analyzed in 2 different bones (bone 1 is deproteinized bone, bone 2 is acellular and defatted bone). It was suggested that DNA of xenogeneic bone can be limited to < 50 ng per mg dry weight for the repair or regeneration with the acceptable immune risk. And α-gal clearance of xenogeneic bone could be an effective risk factor for improving xenograft quality management. CONCLUSIONS: Through the detection of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity, our findings indicated that the supervisions of risk factors could contribute to reduce the immune risk. And the risk factors under the acceptable limitation could decrease or replace animal experiment. However, it still needs to be studied on the limitation of α-gal epitope to predict rejection of xenogeneic bone more accurately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6857292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68572922019-12-05 The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study Sun, Xiaoxia Liu, Chenghu Shi, Yanping Li, Chunling Sun, Likui Hou, Li Wang, Xin Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic bone has been widely used in a variety of clinical bone-related disease to promote bone healing and restore bone defects. However, the adverse effects of immune system limit its application in the clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate xenogeneic bone safety of immunotoxicity and explore the methods for immune risk supervision. RESULTS: Xenogeneic bone, which is freeze-dried bovine cancellous bone, was implanted into the muscle of mice. On day 7, 14 and 28, the effects of xenogeneic bone were examined on humoral immunity and cellular immunity, including the levels of IgG, IgM, C3, inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the lymphocyte phenotype. The data showed that xenogeneic bone implantation had no potential to induce immune responses not only in humoral immunity but also in cellular immunity. To reveal the risk of immunogenicity, the residual DNA and the clearance of α-gal epitope were analyzed in 2 different bones (bone 1 is deproteinized bone, bone 2 is acellular and defatted bone). It was suggested that DNA of xenogeneic bone can be limited to < 50 ng per mg dry weight for the repair or regeneration with the acceptable immune risk. And α-gal clearance of xenogeneic bone could be an effective risk factor for improving xenograft quality management. CONCLUSIONS: Through the detection of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity, our findings indicated that the supervisions of risk factors could contribute to reduce the immune risk. And the risk factors under the acceptable limitation could decrease or replace animal experiment. However, it still needs to be studied on the limitation of α-gal epitope to predict rejection of xenogeneic bone more accurately. BioMed Central 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6857292/ /pubmed/31727050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0729-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sun, Xiaoxia
Liu, Chenghu
Shi, Yanping
Li, Chunling
Sun, Likui
Hou, Li
Wang, Xin
The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
title The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
title_full The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
title_fullStr The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
title_full_unstemmed The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
title_short The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
title_sort assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0729-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxiaoxia theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT liuchenghu theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT shiyanping theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT lichunling theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT sunlikui theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT houli theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT wangxin theassessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT sunxiaoxia assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT liuchenghu assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT shiyanping assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT lichunling assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT sunlikui assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT houli assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy
AT wangxin assessmentofxenogeneicboneimmunotoxicityandriskmanagementstudy