Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews
BACKGROUND: This review aimed to assess the existing evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in adults with insomnia and identify where research or policy development is needed. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, The Cochrane...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1163-9 |
_version_ | 1783470747078885376 |
---|---|
author | Rios, Patricia Cardoso, Roberta Morra, Deanna Nincic, Vera Goodarzi, Zahra Farah, Bechara Harricharan, Sharada Morin, Charles M. Leech, Judith Straus, Sharon E. Tricco, Andrea C. |
author_facet | Rios, Patricia Cardoso, Roberta Morra, Deanna Nincic, Vera Goodarzi, Zahra Farah, Bechara Harricharan, Sharada Morin, Charles M. Leech, Judith Straus, Sharon E. Tricco, Andrea C. |
author_sort | Rios, Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This review aimed to assess the existing evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in adults with insomnia and identify where research or policy development is needed. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, and PubMed were searched from inception until June 14, 2017, along with relevant gray literature sites. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles, and a single reviewer with an independent verifier completed charting, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. RESULTS: A total of 64 systematic reviews (35 with meta-analysis) were included after screening 5024 titles and abstracts and 525 full-text articles. Eight of the included reviews were rated as high quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) tool, and over half of the included articles (n = 40) were rated as low or critically low quality. Consistent evidence of effectiveness across multiple outcomes based on more than one high- or moderate quality review with meta-analysis was found for zolpidem, suvorexant, doxepin, melatonin, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and evidence of effectiveness across multiple outcomes based on one high-quality review with meta-analysis was found for temazepam, triazolam, zopiclone, trazodone, and behavioral interventions. These interventions were mostly evaluated in the short term (< 16 weeks), and there was very little harms data available for the pharmacological interventions making it difficult to evaluate their risk-benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming non-pharmacological interventions are preferable from a safety perspective CBT can be considered an effective first-line therapy for adults with insomnia followed by other behavioral interventions. Short courses of pharmacological interventions can be supplements to CBT or behavioral therapy; however, no evidence regarding the appropriate duration of pharmacological therapy is available from these reviews. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017072527. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6857325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68573252019-12-05 Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews Rios, Patricia Cardoso, Roberta Morra, Deanna Nincic, Vera Goodarzi, Zahra Farah, Bechara Harricharan, Sharada Morin, Charles M. Leech, Judith Straus, Sharon E. Tricco, Andrea C. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: This review aimed to assess the existing evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in adults with insomnia and identify where research or policy development is needed. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, and PubMed were searched from inception until June 14, 2017, along with relevant gray literature sites. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles, and a single reviewer with an independent verifier completed charting, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. RESULTS: A total of 64 systematic reviews (35 with meta-analysis) were included after screening 5024 titles and abstracts and 525 full-text articles. Eight of the included reviews were rated as high quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) tool, and over half of the included articles (n = 40) were rated as low or critically low quality. Consistent evidence of effectiveness across multiple outcomes based on more than one high- or moderate quality review with meta-analysis was found for zolpidem, suvorexant, doxepin, melatonin, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and evidence of effectiveness across multiple outcomes based on one high-quality review with meta-analysis was found for temazepam, triazolam, zopiclone, trazodone, and behavioral interventions. These interventions were mostly evaluated in the short term (< 16 weeks), and there was very little harms data available for the pharmacological interventions making it difficult to evaluate their risk-benefit ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming non-pharmacological interventions are preferable from a safety perspective CBT can be considered an effective first-line therapy for adults with insomnia followed by other behavioral interventions. Short courses of pharmacological interventions can be supplements to CBT or behavioral therapy; however, no evidence regarding the appropriate duration of pharmacological therapy is available from these reviews. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017072527. BioMed Central 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6857325/ /pubmed/31730011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1163-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Rios, Patricia Cardoso, Roberta Morra, Deanna Nincic, Vera Goodarzi, Zahra Farah, Bechara Harricharan, Sharada Morin, Charles M. Leech, Judith Straus, Sharon E. Tricco, Andrea C. Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
title | Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for insomnia: an overview of reviews |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1163-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riospatricia comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT cardosoroberta comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT morradeanna comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT nincicvera comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT goodarzizahra comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT farahbechara comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT harricharansharada comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT morincharlesm comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT leechjudith comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT straussharone comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews AT triccoandreac comparativeeffectivenessandsafetyofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforinsomniaanoverviewofreviews |