Cargando…

Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?

There is increasing awareness that the methodology and findings of research should be transparent. This includes studies using artificial intelligence to develop predictive algorithms that make individualized diagnostic or prognostic risk predictions. We argue that it is paramount to make the algori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Calster, Ben, Wynants, Laure, Timmerman, Dirk, Steyerberg, Ewout W, Collins, Gary S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31373357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz130
_version_ 1783470785005879296
author Van Calster, Ben
Wynants, Laure
Timmerman, Dirk
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Collins, Gary S
author_facet Van Calster, Ben
Wynants, Laure
Timmerman, Dirk
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Collins, Gary S
author_sort Van Calster, Ben
collection PubMed
description There is increasing awareness that the methodology and findings of research should be transparent. This includes studies using artificial intelligence to develop predictive algorithms that make individualized diagnostic or prognostic risk predictions. We argue that it is paramount to make the algorithm behind any prediction publicly available. This allows independent external validation, assessment of performance heterogeneity across settings and over time, and algorithm refinement or updating. Online calculators and apps may aid uptake if accompanied with sufficient information. For algorithms based on “black box” machine learning methods, software for algorithm implementation is a must. Hiding algorithms for commercial exploitation is unethical, because there is no possibility to assess whether algorithms work as advertised or to monitor when and how algorithms are updated. Journals and funders should demand maximal transparency for publications on predictive algorithms, and clinical guidelines should only recommend publicly available algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6857503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68575032019-11-20 Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works? Van Calster, Ben Wynants, Laure Timmerman, Dirk Steyerberg, Ewout W Collins, Gary S J Am Med Inform Assoc Perspective There is increasing awareness that the methodology and findings of research should be transparent. This includes studies using artificial intelligence to develop predictive algorithms that make individualized diagnostic or prognostic risk predictions. We argue that it is paramount to make the algorithm behind any prediction publicly available. This allows independent external validation, assessment of performance heterogeneity across settings and over time, and algorithm refinement or updating. Online calculators and apps may aid uptake if accompanied with sufficient information. For algorithms based on “black box” machine learning methods, software for algorithm implementation is a must. Hiding algorithms for commercial exploitation is unethical, because there is no possibility to assess whether algorithms work as advertised or to monitor when and how algorithms are updated. Journals and funders should demand maximal transparency for publications on predictive algorithms, and clinical guidelines should only recommend publicly available algorithms. Oxford University Press 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6857503/ /pubmed/31373357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz130 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Perspective
Van Calster, Ben
Wynants, Laure
Timmerman, Dirk
Steyerberg, Ewout W
Collins, Gary S
Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
title Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
title_full Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
title_fullStr Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
title_full_unstemmed Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
title_short Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
title_sort predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31373357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz130
work_keys_str_mv AT vancalsterben predictiveanalyticsinhealthcarehowcanweknowitworks
AT wynantslaure predictiveanalyticsinhealthcarehowcanweknowitworks
AT timmermandirk predictiveanalyticsinhealthcarehowcanweknowitworks
AT steyerbergewoutw predictiveanalyticsinhealthcarehowcanweknowitworks
AT collinsgarys predictiveanalyticsinhealthcarehowcanweknowitworks